Displaying 20 results from an estimated 41 matches for "parnas".
Did you mean:
paras
2014 Feb 27
4
nut in openwrt
2014-02-25 10:12 GMT+01:00 Virgo P?rna <virgo.parna at mail.ee>:
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:39:02 +0100, Josu Lazkano <josu.lazkano at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> # dmesg
>> ...
>> [181041.636190] usb 4-4: new low-speed USB device number 2 using ohci_hcd
>>
>
> I recently read about openwrt (for one of the routers I own). And there was a
>
2014 Feb 25
0
nut in openwrt
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:39:02 +0100, Josu Lazkano <josu.lazkano at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> # dmesg
> ...
> [181041.636190] usb 4-4: new low-speed USB device number 2 using ohci_hcd
>
I recently read about openwrt (for one of the routers I own). And there was a
comment that particular router does not support low-speed USB devices (USB1). Could that
be the issue? The one I
2014 Feb 27
0
nut in openwrt
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:53:53 +0100, Josu Lazkano <josu.lazkano at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I plug a USB Hub in OpenWRT but there is nothing in "lsusb" and
> "dmesg". In a Debian server I have this:
>
Then I have no idea, what could be wrong. I have no personal experionce
with it and I only mentioned it, because I recently happened to read it.
--
Virgo
2014 Feb 28
1
nut in openwrt
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:35:06 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar at fantomas.sk> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:39:02 +0100, Josu Lazkano <josu.lazkano at gmail.com> wrote:
>>I plug a USB Hub in OpenWRT but there is nothing in "lsusb" and
>>"dmesg". In a Debian server I have this:
>>
>>
>># lsusb
>>...
>>Bus 001
2014 Feb 27
1
nut in openwrt
2014-02-27 12:57 GMT+01:00 Virgo P?rna <virgo.parna at mail.ee>:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:53:53 +0100, Josu Lazkano <josu.lazkano at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I plug a USB Hub in OpenWRT but there is nothing in "lsusb" and
>> "dmesg". In a Debian server I have this:
>>
>
> Then I have no idea, what could be wrong. I have no
2014 Feb 27
0
nut in openwrt
>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:39:02 +0100, Josu Lazkano <josu.lazkano at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> # dmesg
>>> ...
>>> [181041.636190] usb 4-4: new low-speed USB device number 2 using ohci_hcd
>2014-02-25 10:12 GMT+01:00 Virgo P?rna <virgo.parna at mail.ee>:
>> I recently read about openwrt (for one of the routers I own). And there was a
>>
2025 Jan 22
1
Windows 11 24H2, Samba 4.21.3 AD DC and domain users cannot log in
On 22.01.2025 12:25, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>>
>> After this started happening, I did try setting same password
>> again for user with smbpasswd in linux.
>
> Try using samba-tool to set a new password for the user.
I'l try it.
Although righ now I'm considering removing computer from domain and
adding again... Because isse seems to be with all domain
2025 Jan 22
1
Windows 11 24H2, Samba 4.21.3 AD DC and domain users cannot log in
On 22.01.2025 12:38, Virgo P?rna via samba wrote:
> On 22.01.2025 12:25, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>>>
>>> ????After this started happening, I did try setting same password
>>> again for user with smbpasswd in linux.
>>
>> Try using samba-tool to set a new password for the user.
>
> ????I'l try it.
Did try it, did not work.
>
2025 Jan 22
1
Windows 11 24H2, Samba 4.21.3 AD DC and domain users cannot log in
On 22.01.2025 16:16, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 15:46:44 +0200
> Virgo P?rna via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>> After enabling auth_audit logging at samba, there are lot of messages
>> with status NT_STATUS_TIME_DIFFERENCE_AT_DC
>> But clock is synced and same in workstation and in server...
>>
>
> From the
2025 Jan 24
1
Windows 11 24H2, Samba 4.21.3 AD DC and domain users cannot log in
On 24.01.2025 11:23, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>
> Yes, I did look at the MSK years, but ignored them because everything
> should be using EET and the time isn't stored like that in AD.
>
I suspect, that internally everything is in UTC and when logging into
file it is converted to string by server location locale and timezone...
Europe/Tallinn.
Just really strange value
2025 Jan 31
1
Windows 11 24H2, Samba 4.21.3 AD DC and domain users cannot log in
On 30.01.2025 21:44, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>
> A post on reddit on a similar subject lead to this:
>
> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/2086759/insufficient-system-resources-exist-to-complete-th
>
> Perhaps it will help.
Interesting. Different error (I'm getting invalid username/password),
but is worth checking. PC does not have Bitlocker
2025 Feb 04
1
Windows 11 24H2, Samba 4.21.3 AD DC and domain users cannot log in
On 31.01.2025 10:42, Virgo P?rna via samba wrote:
>
> ????Interesting. Different error (I'm getting invalid username/
> password), but is worth checking. PC does not have Bitlocker
> fortunately. And all the VM-s I have tested are running in same Win 11
> PC. I'll try clearing TMP on next office day (currently working remotely).
TPM reset did not change anything
2025 Jan 22
2
Windows 11 24H2, Samba 4.21.3 AD DC and domain users cannot log in
One more detail... I'm working currently remotely, so I'm accessing
that Windows 11 computer over remote desktop. If I actually supply
incorrect password, then that error shows up on password promt dialog
(The logon attempt failed). If I supply correct password, then
connection is establised. I'll get Windows console view with "The
username or password is incorrect. Try
2025 Jan 24
1
Windows 11 24H2, Samba 4.21.3 AD DC and domain users cannot log in
On 24.01.2025 11:54, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>
> Which is why I said stop using the old tools, that conversion from 'AD'
> to 'MSK' isn't coming from AD, it is coming from the tools you are
> using.
>
It is in samba log file.
> If I were you, I would try resetting the users password, it could be
> something as simple as the PC is using kerberos
2014 Feb 23
5
nut in openwrt
2014-02-23 17:57 GMT+01:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>:
> On Feb 22, 2014, at 9:51 AM, Josu Lazkano wrote:
>
>> The problem is that I don't know where to configure it.
>>
>> Anyone with a UPS connect to a OpenWRT device?
>
> What version of OpenWRT?
>
> I haven't tried this myself, but it looks like recent versions of OpenWRT use UCI,
1999 Jul 16
3
Carriage Returns in files after copying
I apologize in advance if I'm wasting bandwidth with a simple question, but
I was unable to find a solution for this problem in the documentation...
I've got a set of shares set up on a SUN Enterprise 5500 using Samba 2.0.4.
In Windows NT, I map a drive to the share. When I copy a text file from
Windows NT to the SUN, editing the file in UNIX shows that ^M has been added
to the end of
2025 Jan 22
1
Windows 11 24H2, Samba 4.21.3 AD DC and domain users cannot log in
After enabling auth_audit logging at samba, there are lot of messages
with status NT_STATUS_TIME_DIFFERENCE_AT_DC
But clock is synced and same in workstation and in server...
--
Virgo P?rna
virgo.parna at mail.ee
2025 Jan 22
1
Windows 11 24H2, Samba 4.21.3 AD DC and domain users cannot log in
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 15:46:44 +0200
Virgo P?rna via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> After enabling auth_audit logging at samba, there are lot of messages
> with status NT_STATUS_TIME_DIFFERENCE_AT_DC
> But clock is synced and same in workstation and in server...
>
From the looks of it, your workstation thinks differently, could it be
a timezone problem ?
If I run
2025 Jan 22
1
Windows 11 24H2, Samba 4.21.3 AD DC and domain users cannot log in
On 22.01.2025 13:00, Virgo P?rna via samba wrote:
> ????One more detail... I'm working currently remotely, so I'm
> accessing that Windows 11 computer over remote desktop. If I actually
> supply incorrect password, then that error shows up on password promt
> dialog (The logon attempt failed). If I supply correct password, then
> connection is establised. I'll get
2025 Jan 23
1
Windows 11 24H2, Samba 4.21.3 AD DC and domain users cannot log in
It is quite possible, that NT_STATUS_TIME_DIFFERENCE_AT_DC is some kind
of red herring. I found thread from July, where it was suggested, that
"Samba seems to return it as an error code as a backstop".
I did add log level = 10 with custom IP based filename to get
additional logs. But it seems, that with
log level = 1 auth_audit:5@/var/log/samba/auth_audit.log
in main config... auth