Displaying 20 results from an estimated 66 matches for "parlappli".
Did you mean:
parlapply
2005 Nov 11
1
Snow parLapply
Dear R-user,
I am trying to use the function 'parLapply' from the 'snow' package
which is supposed to work the same wys as 'lapply' but for a
parallelized cluster of computers. The function I am trying to call in
parallel is 'dudi.pca' (from the 'ade4' package) which performs
principal component analyses. When I call this function on a list of
2013 Dec 24
2
Parallel computing: how to transmit multiple parameters to a function in parLapply?
Hi R-developers
In the package Parallel, the function parLapply(cl, x, f) seems to allow
transmission of only one parameter (x) to the function f. Hence in order to
compute f(x, y) parallelly, I had to define f(x, y) as f(x) and tried to
access y within the function, whereas y was defined outside of f(x).
Script:
library(parallel)
f <- function(x) {
z <- 2 * x + .GlobalEnv$y # Try to
2018 Mar 15
2
clusterApply arguments
Thank you for your answer!
I agree with you except for the 3 (Error) example and
I realize now I should have started with that in the explanation.
>From my point of view
parLapply(cl = clu, X = 1:2, fun = fun, c = 1)
shouldn't give an error.
This could be easily avoided by using all the argument
names in the custerApply call of parLapply which means changing,
parLapply <-
2012 Aug 21
1
parLapply fails to detect default cluster?
invoking parLapply without a cluster fails to find a previously
registered cluster
> library(parallel)
> setDefaultCluster(makePSOCKcluster(2))
> parLapply(X=1:2, fun=function(...) {})
Error in cut.default(i, breaks) : invalid number of intervals
This is because in parLapply length(cl) is determined before
defaultCluster(cl) is called. By inspection, this appears to be true of
2012 Jan 12
1
parLapply within a function
Dear R users,
I have some problems with the parLapply function from the "parallel"
package:
I use parLapply on a pretty big R object without changing the object
within the called function. If I execute parLapply alone, everything
works fine. It seems that the object resides only once in the memory.
But if I use the same call within another function, the object seems to
be multiplied to
2010 Dec 02
1
parLapply - Error in do.call("fun", lapply(args, enquote)) : could not find function "fun"
Hello everybody,
I've got a bit of a problem with parLapply that's left me scratching my head
today. I've tried this in R 2.11 and the 23 bit Revolution R Enterprise and
gotten the same result, OS in question is Windows XP, the package involved
is the snow package.
I've got a list of 20 rain/no rain (1/0) situations for these two stations i
and j, all the items in this list look
2017 Dec 11
0
document environment passing in parallel::parLapply
The runtime of parallel::parLapply depends on variables unrelated to
the parLapply call. However, this is not clearly documented. Therefore
I would like to suggest expanding the relevant documentation to
explain this behaviour.
Consider this example:
parallel_demo <- function(random_values_count) {
some_data <- runif(random_values_count)
dummy_function <- function(x) {
x
}
2007 Mar 27
2
snow parLapply standard output
I am slightly confused by the way the standard output is redirected in a R
snow cluster environment.
I am using parLapply from the snow package to execute a function on my
MPI/LAM cluster. How can I redirect standard output (produced using "cat")
from this function back to the terminal where I invoked it? I intend to
transmit some status information in advance to the final result of the
2018 Mar 14
2
clusterApply arguments
Hi!
I recognized that the argument matching of clusterApply (and therefore parLapply) goes wrong when one of the arguments of the function is called "c". In this case, the argument "c" is used as cluster and the functions give the following error message "Error in checkCluster(cl) : not a valid cluster".
Of course, "c" is for many reasons an unfortunate
2018 Mar 15
1
clusterApply arguments
On 03/15/2018 05:25 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:39 AM, <FlorianSchwendinger at gmx.at> wrote:
>> Thank you for your answer!
>> I agree with you except for the 3 (Error) example and
>> I realize now I should have started with that in the explanation.
>>
>> From my point of view
>> parLapply(cl = clu, X = 1:2, fun = fun, c =
2010 Apr 09
1
Rsge: recursive parallelization
In principle, I'd like to be able to do something like this:
sge.parLapply(seq(10), function(x) parLapply(seq(x), function(x) x^2))
In practice, however, I have to resort to acrobatics like this:
sge.options(sge.remove.files=FALSE)
sge.options(sge.qsub.options='-cwd -V')
sge.parLapply(seq(10),
function(x) {
sge.options(sge.save.global=TRUE)
2012 Oct 23
0
Typos/omissions/inconsistencies in man page for clusterApply
Hi,
Here are the issues I found:
Typos
-----
(a) Found: It a parallel version of ?evalq?,
"is" missing.
(b) Found: 'parLapplyLB', 'parSapplyLB' are load-balancing versions,
intended for use when applying ?FUN? to
'parLapplyLB' has no 'FUN' arg (more on this below).
(c) Found: 'clusterApply' calls 'fun' on the first
2011 Feb 03
1
problem with parLapply from snow
Hi,
The following function use to work, but now it doesn't giving the error
"> CallSnow(, 100)
Using snow package, asking for 2 nodes
2 slaves are spawned successfully. 0 failed.
Error in checkForRemoteErrors(val) :
2 nodes produced errors; first error: no applicable method for 'lapply' applied to an object of class "list"
".
Where this is the
2012 Dec 21
1
Parallel code using parLapply
Dear R-users
I was running into problems with my R code trying to run clh sampling (clhs package) in parallel mode (=on various data sets simultaneously).
Here is the code (which I developed with some help:)):
******************************************
library("clhs")
library("snow")
a <- as.data.frame(replicate(1000, rnorm(20)))
b <- as.data.frame(replicate(1000,
2018 Mar 15
0
clusterApply arguments
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:39 AM, <FlorianSchwendinger at gmx.at> wrote:
> Thank you for your answer!
> I agree with you except for the 3 (Error) example and
> I realize now I should have started with that in the explanation.
>
> From my point of view
> parLapply(cl = clu, X = 1:2, fun = fun, c = 1)
> shouldn't give an error.
>
> This could be easily avoided by
2018 Sep 12
2
Environments and parallel processing
While using parallelization R seems to clone all environments (that are normally passed by reference) that are returned from a child process. In particular, consider the following example:
library(parallel)
env1 <- new.env()
envs2 <- lapply(1:4, function(x) env1)
cl<-makeCluster(2, type="FORK")
envs3 <- parLapply(cl, 1:4, function(x) env1)
envs4 <- parLapply(cl, 1:4,
2014 Jul 02
1
parLapply on sqlQuery (from package RODBC)
R Version : 2.14.1 x64
Running on Windows 7
Connecting to a database on a remote Microsoft SQL Server 2012
The short form of my problem is the following.
I have an unordered vectors of names, say:
names<-c("A", "B", "A", "C","C")
each of which have an id in a table in my db. I need to convert the names to their corresponding ids.
I
2012 Oct 26
0
parallel::pvec FUN types differ when v is a list; code simplifications?
In pvec(list(1, 2), FUN, mc.cores=2) FUN sees integer() arguments whereas
pvec(list(1, 2, 3), FUN, mc.cores=2) FUN sees list() arguments; the latter seems
consistent with pvec's description.
This came up in a complicated Bioconductor thread about generics and parallel
evaluation
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioc-devel/2012-October/003745.html
One relevant point is that a
2018 Sep 12
0
Environments and parallel processing
This is all normal, a fork cluster works with processes, that do not
share memory. When you create a fork cluster, you create a new
process, that has the same memory layout as the parent. But from this
moment its memory is independent of the parent process. When parLapply
is done, the results are serialized and copied back to the parent
process. The serialized environment is independent of the
2013 Jul 18
0
parLapplyLB: Load balancing?
[cross-posted on R-devel and Bioc-devel, since the functions from the
parallel package discussed here are mirrored in the BiocGenerics package]
Hi,
I am currently running a lengthy simulation study (no details necessary)
on a large multi-core system. The simulated data sets are stored in a
long list and they are unevenly sized (hence, the computation times vary
greatly between data sets), so