Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "paritcular".
2008 Jan 30
2
[LLVMdev] Possible LiveInterval Bug
...tain ordering. So for
example, if my iterator range is over:
1 2 3 4 5
and I call std::upper_bound(begin(), end(), 6), it's going to
return end() because that's the position before which 6
should be inserted to maintain ordering.
I did find a bug in other parts of my code that made this
paritcular problem go away, but if end() is not expected here
we should document that with an assert. Otherwise we
should check for it and act appropriately (I don't know what
that would be in this case).
-Dave
2006 Jul 08
10
A rant about parameters
...od signature, what kind of variables the method takes? This
is one instance where I miss static typing...if this were Java code I
would''ve known in two seconds what the method expected.
I''m honestly seeking your advice here...how do you keep the various
different ways methods, paritcularly ActionView helpers, can be called
straight?
Compounding the problem (and confusing me) was this method further down
in the call stack:
----
module ActionView::Helpers
class InstanceTag
def to_country_select_tag(priority_countries, options, html_options)
html_options...
2006 Aug 28
0
Splancs Query
...and changing the spatial
distances and times for the analyses, affected the significance of the
results. Before or after certain spatial distances, the results were no
more significant, also certain specifications of the times ruined the
analyses. A follow-up question to this is if there is a paritcular techniqe
for chosing the spatial distances and times for the analyses.
My approach of space-time clustering is to use the space-time K-function
analysis to check for the presence of clustering. Once present, a search
for their locations and tests for their significance could be carried out
u...
2008 Jan 30
0
[LLVMdev] Possible LiveInterval Bug
AFAIK std::upper_bound() would not return end(), right?
Evan
On Jan 29, 2008, at 3:08 PM, David Greene wrote:
> I just ran into a problem here. I'm in SimpleRegisterCoalescing at
> the point
> where EXTRACT_SUBREG coalescing updates live ranges of aliased
> registers (around line 473 of SimpleRegisterCoalescing.cpp).
>
> There's a call to MergeValueInAsValue at line
2008 Jan 30
0
[LLVMdev] Possible LiveInterval Bug
...ator range is over:
>
> 1 2 3 4 5
>
> and I call std::upper_bound(begin(), end(), 6), it's going to
> return end() because that's the position before which 6
> should be inserted to maintain ordering.
>
> I did find a bug in other parts of my code that made this
> paritcular problem go away, but if end() is not expected here
> we should document that with an assert. Otherwise we
> should check for it and act appropriately (I don't know what
> that would be in this case).
>
> -Dave
> __________________________...
2008 Jan 29
2
[LLVMdev] Possible LiveInterval Bug
I just ran into a problem here. I'm in SimpleRegisterCoalescing at the point
where EXTRACT_SUBREG coalescing updates live ranges of aliased
registers (around line 473 of SimpleRegisterCoalescing.cpp).
There's a call to MergeValueInAsValue at line 50. MergeValueInAsValue has
this code:
void LiveInterval::MergeValueInAsValue(const LiveInterval &RHS,
2005 Aug 26
2
Dovecot Virtual Users & Sendmail
Not directly Dovecot, but a configuration problem.
We have a working set-up with Dovecot+Procmail+Sendmail, using
POP-before-SMTP. We want to be able to offer email accounts to some
local schools, using SquirrelMail (keeps their costs & maintenance
down). The whole arrangement is working, but we don't want to have to
have 300+ School children as users of our
Red Hat Enterprise server,