search for: paritcular

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "paritcular".

2008 Jan 30
2
[LLVMdev] Possible LiveInterval Bug
...tain ordering. So for example, if my iterator range is over: 1 2 3 4 5 and I call std::upper_bound(begin(), end(), 6), it's going to return end() because that's the position before which 6 should be inserted to maintain ordering. I did find a bug in other parts of my code that made this paritcular problem go away, but if end() is not expected here we should document that with an assert. Otherwise we should check for it and act appropriately (I don't know what that would be in this case). -Dave
2006 Jul 08
10
A rant about parameters
...od signature, what kind of variables the method takes? This is one instance where I miss static typing...if this were Java code I would''ve known in two seconds what the method expected. I''m honestly seeking your advice here...how do you keep the various different ways methods, paritcularly ActionView helpers, can be called straight? Compounding the problem (and confusing me) was this method further down in the call stack: ---- module ActionView::Helpers class InstanceTag def to_country_select_tag(priority_countries, options, html_options) html_options...
2006 Aug 28
0
Splancs Query
...and changing the spatial distances and times for the analyses, affected the significance of the results. Before or after certain spatial distances, the results were no more significant, also certain specifications of the times ruined the analyses. A follow-up question to this is if there is a paritcular techniqe for chosing the spatial distances and times for the analyses. My approach of space-time clustering is to use the space-time K-function analysis to check for the presence of clustering. Once present, a search for their locations and tests for their significance could be carried out u...
2008 Jan 30
0
[LLVMdev] Possible LiveInterval Bug
AFAIK std::upper_bound() would not return end(), right? Evan On Jan 29, 2008, at 3:08 PM, David Greene wrote: > I just ran into a problem here. I'm in SimpleRegisterCoalescing at > the point > where EXTRACT_SUBREG coalescing updates live ranges of aliased > registers (around line 473 of SimpleRegisterCoalescing.cpp). > > There's a call to MergeValueInAsValue at line
2008 Jan 30
0
[LLVMdev] Possible LiveInterval Bug
...ator range is over: > > 1 2 3 4 5 > > and I call std::upper_bound(begin(), end(), 6), it's going to > return end() because that's the position before which 6 > should be inserted to maintain ordering. > > I did find a bug in other parts of my code that made this > paritcular problem go away, but if end() is not expected here > we should document that with an assert. Otherwise we > should check for it and act appropriately (I don't know what > that would be in this case). > > -Dave > __________________________...
2008 Jan 29
2
[LLVMdev] Possible LiveInterval Bug
I just ran into a problem here. I'm in SimpleRegisterCoalescing at the point where EXTRACT_SUBREG coalescing updates live ranges of aliased registers (around line 473 of SimpleRegisterCoalescing.cpp). There's a call to MergeValueInAsValue at line 50. MergeValueInAsValue has this code: void LiveInterval::MergeValueInAsValue(const LiveInterval &RHS,
2005 Aug 26
2
Dovecot Virtual Users & Sendmail
Not directly Dovecot, but a configuration problem. We have a working set-up with Dovecot+Procmail+Sendmail, using POP-before-SMTP. We want to be able to offer email accounts to some local schools, using SquirrelMail (keeps their costs & maintenance down). The whole arrangement is working, but we don't want to have to have 300+ School children as users of our Red Hat Enterprise server,