search for: paricular

...Ursprungligt meddelande----- Fr?n: Ashish Garg Skickat: to 2003-05-08 09:04 Till: Jair; John H Terpstra Kopia: samba@lists.samba.org ?mne: Samba Installation help for a domain HI Guys, I need some help regarding Samba Installation for a domain. My Windows 2000 clients connect to a paricular doamin. My Samba servers are up and running on Unix machine.I browsed a lot how to put domain in place of a workstation. Right now in the smb.conf file I have given the domian name itself. But surprisingly I don't find my Samba server shares in the network neighbourhood of client machinee.....

hello, I wanna use some mathematics formula and to do this I tried several way in paricular using strsplit textconnection scan setdiff but I think that it's a lil hard the data frame that I'm working on is as follow > donCalcara2 Id_Cara Form_C 1 743...

I am using htmlParse from XML library on a paricular website. Sometimes code fails, sometimes it works, most of the time id doesn't and i cannot see why. The file i am trying to parse is  http://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/prices-and-markets/international-markets/indices/home/sp-500.html?page=0 Sometimes the following code works n<...

I have library in development with a function that works when called from the top level, but fails under R CMD check. The paricular line of failure is rsum <- rowSums(kmat>0) where kmat is a dsCMatrix object. I'm currently stumped and looking for some ideas. I've created a stripped down library "ktest" that has only 3 functions: pedigree.R to create a pedigree or pedigreeList object, kinship....

...now click on a link to get to the desired spot, but the proxy function _automagically_ sends the user, when they access the msdfs share, to the netapp's readonly share without the extra click. And it is that extra click that is our show-stopper: our users have sadly over many many years used a paricular server name in their office documents & co., of course also with lots and lots of links in the documents themselves. Presentations, speadsheet caluculations, links to other docs, etc. will all fail. The general managment then, understandably, forbade us from forcing everyone (1000+ people) t...

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Bruce Stephens <bruce.r.stephens at gmail.com> wrote: > Jochen Wilhelmy <j.wilhelmy-KvP5wT2u2U0 at public.gmane.org> writes: > > [...] > >> So my question: Is there a paricular reason why the standard stream >> interprets signed char and >> unsigned char as characters instead of numbers? > > That seems to me to be the better interpretation.  Specifically, it > would be surprising (to me) if > >        std::cout << "Hello world" &...

Hi, There''s something really bizarre in ZFS snaphot specs : "Uses no separate backing store." . Hum...if I want to mutualize one physical volume somewhere in my SAN as THE snaphots backing-store...it becomes impossible to do ! Really bad. Is there any chance to have a "backing-store-file" option in a future release ? In the same idea, it would be great to

...to get to the desired spot, but the proxy function > _automagically_ sends the user, when they access the msdfs share, to the > netapp's readonly share without the extra click. And it is that extra > click that is our show-stopper: our users have sadly over many many years > used a paricular server name in their office documents & co., of course > also with lots and lots of links in the documents themselves. > Presentations, speadsheet caluculations, links to other docs, etc. will > all fail. The general managment then, understandably, forbade us from > forcing everyo...

Trying to set up UEFI Syslinux boot on an ArchLinux USB 4GB stick. - Host system: 64-bit Ubuntu 14.10 on 56 GB hard drive - Hardware: ASUS P8H77-I, Bios v1101, i7-3770 at 3.40 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 - ArchLinux Instructions followed: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Syslinux#UEFI_Systems > ? ? 2. UEFI Systems > 2.2 Installation - Arch syslinux v.6.03 196352 Oct 13 22:25 /usr/sbin/syslinux

...FI firmware", not "in BIOS". > And yet, this is still not clear (at least, not to me). We're in sync here (although not immediately apparent :) I'm resonably familiar with UEFI. Above, by "in BIOS" I meant going to my machine's "BIOS", i.e., in my paricular case/motherboard, Boot Hit Delete key Hit F8 and then select from among the _UEFI_ menu entries the subject "ArchLinux" entry (and watch what happens). Unfortunately, instead of the expected nice menu created by me in 'syslinux.cfg' I get the problem "boot:" prompt in t...

...to get to the desired spot, but the proxy function > _automagically_ sends the user, when they access the msdfs share, to the > netapp's readonly share without the extra click. And it is that extra > click that is our show-stopper: our users have sadly over many many years > used a paricular server name in their office documents & co., of course > also with lots and lots of links in the documents themselves. > Presentations, speadsheet caluculations, links to other docs, etc. will > all fail. The general managment then, understandably, forbade us from > forcing everyo...

...uot;in BIOS". > > And yet, this is still not clear (at least, not to me). > > We're in sync here (although not immediately apparent :) > I'm resonably familiar with UEFI.? Above, by "in BIOS" I meant > going to my machine's "BIOS", i.e., in my paricular case/motherboard, > Boot > Hit Delete key > Hit F8 > and then select from among the _UEFI_ menu entries > the subject "ArchLinux" entry (and watch what happens).? Unfortunately, Is this "ArchLinux" entry equivalent to "\EFI\syslinux\syslinux.efi" in y...

Thanks, but I am still having the same problem -- I made sure to reference the correct passwd file, but WinXP is still forcing me to logon as AGAMEMNON\Guest. Tim -----Original Message----- From: miles123@gmx.de [mailto:miles123@gmx.de] Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 6:11 AM To: tbbooher@cox.net Subject: SOME Suggestions on [Samba] Can't the very basic stuff to work Hello Tim, I have read

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 03:31:55PM +0200, Greg Enlow wrote: > Hi, > > The Server to which the msdfs is pointing is a netapp. Though we theoretically can access the shell on it then begin to mess around there, we would really like to avoid that. Warranty and such make it a bit of a legal issue. That is the reason we went with a separate instance in the first place and now wonder why the

Dear all, When I compared the performance of some application on both a Xen domU and a standard linux machine (where domU runs on a similar physical mahine), I notice the application runs faster on the domU than on the physical machine. Instrumenting the application code shows the application spends more time on popen() calls on domU than on the physical machine. I wonder if xenlinux does some

Hi, This is the Xen implementation for the paravirt_ops interface. The series is based on 2.6.22-rc1-mm1, and I think its ready to be cooked in -mm with a view to being merged in 2.6.23. The first part of the series is some small changes to the core kernel. Apart from the new code added in "Allocate and free vmalloc areas" (posted many times before), they are simply a few one-liners

Hi, This is the Xen implementation for the paravirt_ops interface. The series is based on 2.6.22-rc1-mm1, and I think its ready to be cooked in -mm with a view to being merged in 2.6.23. The first part of the series is some small changes to the core kernel. Apart from the new code added in "Allocate and free vmalloc areas" (posted many times before), they are simply a few one-liners

Hi, This is the Xen implementation for the paravirt_ops interface. The series is based on 2.6.22-rc1-mm1, and I think its ready to be cooked in -mm with a view to being merged in 2.6.23. The first part of the series is some small changes to the core kernel. Apart from the new code added in "Allocate and free vmalloc areas" (posted many times before), they are simply a few one-liners