search for: parenting

On Monday 14 March 2005 06:29 pm, Mark Williamson wrote: > > I don''t know if this is the right place to post, but I can''t find any > > info about my problem on the net. > > Yes, this is the right place. > > > title Xen2610 > > kernel /boot/xen.gz dom0_mem=131072 console=vga > > module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.10-xen0 root=/dev/hde1 ro console=tty0

Hi, I´m shaping traffic using htb on both interfaces, I noticed that shaping download traffic is workinggreat but shaping upload traffic is not working at all (no sent packets, no dropped, no overlimits)I have eth0 facing the backbone and eth1 facing the LAN. Thanks for your help.These are the commands I run:tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1 htb default 10 r2q 5 tc

As far as I can tell, the counter_cache option on a belongs_to model doesn''t actually save anything in the database. For example, I have the following models: class Parent < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :children, :conditions => "deleted_at IS NULL" end class Child < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :parent, :counter_cache => true end With the following

If I have... class Parent has_many :children end class Child belongs_to :parent end ...then... * Assigning a _new_ child during parent''s creation saves the child record with the parent''s id. child = Child.new Parent.create(:children => [child]) # Results in child being associated with parent * Assigning an existing child after a parent''s creation

Hi all. I have a bridge running Linux 2.4.24 that I use as a bandwidth manager on a broadband wireless network. I''m using HTB and SFQ to prioritize that share bandwidth on a per-cell basis. My IP tables rules divide the traffic based on IPand traffic type (using layer-7 filter and ipp2p). My goal is to make sure that p2p traffic on the network doesn''t sink all of the

Assume a model Parent and another model Child. Child belongs_to Parent and Parent has_many Children. The following fails: @ p = Parent.find(:first) assert p.equal?(p.children[0].parent) @ It seems odd to me that I and my child''s parent are not the same object. In fact, this is royally screwing me up. Can anyone tell me why this is or point me at a relevant discussion, blog posting,

hello to all i''m trying to set a filter but doesn''t want to work. i''ve set ut the qdiscs and the classes like this : tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: htb default 20 tc class add dev ppp0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 120kbit tc class add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 30kbit ceil 120kbit tc class add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 classid 1:21 htb rate 30kbit ceil

----- Original Message ----- From: Michał Joachimiak To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 3:45 PM Subject: HTB - Really Big problem Hello everybody! Since week i dig lists and www and can''t find solution for my problem. I''m using HTB 3.13 kernel 2-4-25 smp iptables 1.2.9. I''ve got situation like this: LAN------Linux Box(routing only)------- Linux

Given the two tables Parent, Child where Parent has_many children: If I don''t save parent first then it seems that child.parent will not be assigned automatically if I call parent.children << child . Must the parent record be saved before I call parent.children << child ? If I must save Parent first then can someone explain to me how I can call parent.valid? before it

Hi, complete newb and I apologise for it. I have a setup where my linux box has multiple broadband connection where I am routing certain things over certain interfaces, currently 2 links eth2 is a 1500/256 and eth3 is a 512/512, eth0 is the link to the LAN for users. What I am trying to do is traffic shape the information going out eth0 to the local users by the interface the traffic arrived

Hi, On 06-Dec-16 10:10, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Alternatively if you could try and print the args array in cmd_search? > > f 14 > p args[0] > p args[1] > ... > until NULL My hand got sore at first 100 and they are below. I will mail you the binary and core in seperate mail. (gdb) f 14 #14 0x08058219 in cmd_search (cmd=0x85e1800) at cmd-search.c:42 42 ret =

I have a legacy database that I can''t figure out. I''ve tried hundres of times and spent way tooooo much time trying to figure this out. I don''t think that rails can do it. Maybe there is a superman here who can get this too work. I''m going to post my sql dump to produce a very simple database. If anyone can get rails to work with this THEY WILL BE MY

If i have a parent that has_many :children, and the child belongs_to :parent. Then when I add a new child to the parent like so: parent.children << Child.new, then shouldn''t the child also have a reference to the parent? but it doesn''t-- child.parent is nil-- what''s going on here? is this as it should be-- shouldn''t it have a reference to the

disclaimer: am in the midst of my first ruby/rails project I have a situation where I want several child records to be created when a new parent record is created. The following represents my first stab at coding it, am I on the right track? Here is the model: parents ---------- id name children ---------- id parent_id name class Parent < ActiveRecord::Base has_many: children end

Hello! I have an internet connection of 64kbps garanteed in a channel of 256kbps. On this connection the metropolitan speed is 10Mbps and in the provider''s network the speed is 100Mbps. I have a few clients behind my linux box and i want to set up some limitations because some of them are using it irrational. I am marking the packets with 0 for internet; 1 for metropolitan 2 for

Dear All, I''m using the kernel 2.6.6, iproute2-2.4.7.20020116, iptables v1.2.9, and gentoo. I have a leased-line 64 kbps. I can see the counter works in iptables, but in the htb, it doesn''t go to the right class (it always go to the default class). Any help will be appreciated here''s my htb conf #!/bin/bash tc qdisc del dev eth1 root tc qdisc add dev eth1 root

Hi I''m doing traffic shaping with tc on ''10.0.0.0/30'' and ''10.0.0.28/30''. I want to delete part of shaping rules on the fly. (see my configuration at the end of this mail) I wan''t to delete the shaping for ''10.0.0.0/30'' on the fly while still keeping the shaping for part ''10.0.0.28/30'' running. When I for

Hi everyone, My HTB script is showing me those "r2q change" warnings. I read that I should test with r2q values to gain accuracy and stop the warnings but I made some tests with r2q and with burst and I still get the warnings. Any ideas on this issue will be very helpful. The script seems to be working as the bandwidth for the IPs is being shaped. The NIC works at 100mbit and the

I shape my upstream cable link with HTB from a script. My voip traffic (from the 192.168.0.14 host) gets priority over everything else to the near-starvation of other classes; the rest of the traffic is split up based on some priority rules (qos, empty ack packets, etc). eth1 is the uplink I''ve been using HTB and fw marking for the job until recently, when I changed the queue structure

Hello, I have begun to use the tc scripts since 2 weeks ago, so I am beginner. I am trying to divide my bandwidth in 4 independent ones. Each of these sub-bandwidths is assigned to 4 different groups of ip. Bandwidth sharing is allowed. I put a Linux with two Ethernet card between the router and the LAN. Eth1 is the card connected to the router and eth0 is the one connected to the LAN. My ISP