search for: paravirt_al

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on

This patch set is for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on native

This patch set is for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on native

This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect call into in-place execution or direct call. The first patch imports helper functions which themselves doesn't interesting things. The second patch replaces the indirect function calls with a

This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect call into in-place execution or direct call. The first patch imports helper functions which themselves doesn't interesting things. The second patch replaces the indirect function calls with a

plain text document attachment (xx-paravirt-asm-offsets.patch) Add offsets for use of paravirt-ops in assembly. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt srostedt@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Index: work-nopv/arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.c =================================================================== ---

plain text document attachment (xx-paravirt-asm-offsets.patch) Add offsets for use of paravirt-ops in assembly. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt srostedt@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Index: work-nopv/arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.c =================================================================== ---

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops

...tion 1: the current way The code would look like static inline unsigned long paravirt_get_cpuid(int index) { register __u64 ia64_intri_res asm ("r8"); register __u64 __index asm ("r8") = index; asm volatile (paravirt_alt_inst("mov %0=cpuid[%r1]", PARAVIRT_INST_GET_CPUID): "=r"(ia64_intri_res): "0O"(__index)); return ia64_intri_res; } #define ia64_get_cpuid paravirt_get_cpuid...

...tion 1: the current way The code would look like static inline unsigned long paravirt_get_cpuid(int index) { register __u64 ia64_intri_res asm ("r8"); register __u64 __index asm ("r8") = index; asm volatile (paravirt_alt_inst("mov %0=cpuid[%r1]", PARAVIRT_INST_GET_CPUID): "=r"(ia64_intri_res): "0O"(__index)); return ia64_intri_res; } #define ia64_get_cpuid paravirt_get_cpuid...

...mm); +} + +static inline void paravirt_exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm) +{ + paravirt_ops.exit_mmap(mm); +} + +#define __flush_tlb() paravirt_ops.flush_tlb_user() +#define __flush_tlb_all() paravirt_ops.flush_tlb_kernel() +#define __flush_tlb_one(addr) paravirt_ops.flush_tlb_single(addr) + +#define paravirt_alloc_pt(pfn) paravirt_ops.alloc_pt(pfn) +#define paravirt_release_pt(pfn) paravirt_ops.release_pt(pfn) + +#define paravirt_alloc_pd(pfn) paravirt_ops.alloc_pd(pfn) +#define paravirt_alloc_pd_clone(pfn, clonepfn, start, count) \ + paravirt_ops.alloc_pd_clone(pfn, clonepfn, start, count) +#define parav...

...mm); +} + +static inline void paravirt_exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm) +{ + paravirt_ops.exit_mmap(mm); +} + +#define __flush_tlb() paravirt_ops.flush_tlb_user() +#define __flush_tlb_all() paravirt_ops.flush_tlb_kernel() +#define __flush_tlb_one(addr) paravirt_ops.flush_tlb_single(addr) + +#define paravirt_alloc_pt(pfn) paravirt_ops.alloc_pt(pfn) +#define paravirt_release_pt(pfn) paravirt_ops.release_pt(pfn) + +#define paravirt_alloc_pd(pfn) paravirt_ops.alloc_pd(pfn) +#define paravirt_alloc_pd_clone(pfn, clonepfn, start, count) \ + paravirt_ops.alloc_pd_clone(pfn, clonepfn, start, count) +#define parav...