search for: paramtypes

...ction type you want to cast to. 2. Use a cast instruction to actually perform the type cast. In the code I'm currently working on, I do the following to cast a function pointer from one type to another. Hopefully the line wrapping won't totally destroy this. std::vector<const Type*> paramTypes; // First parameter: a void pointer paramTypes.push_back( PointerType::get( Type::getPrimitiveType( Type::SByteTyID ) ) ); FunctionType* pthreadFunctionType = FunctionType::get( PointerType::get( Type::getPrimitiveType( Type::SByteTyID ) ), paramTypes, false ); assert( pthreadFunctionType !...

I recently ran into the following problem. I'm prototyping a compiler for a dynamically typed language in which functions are first class objects. Assuming I have something like this: if(rand() > 5) i = define(x, y, z) { return x + y + z; } else i = define(x, y) { return x + y; } At this point I cannot know the type of 'i' at compile time. At runtime 'i' is a

...es from the arguments that are present. PointerType *PFTy = 0; FunctionType *Ty = 0; if (!(PFTy = dyn_cast<PointerType>(RetType)) || !(Ty = dyn_cast<FunctionType>(PFTy->getElementType()))) { // Pull out the types of all of the arguments... std::vector<Type*> ParamTypes; for (unsigned i = 0, e = ArgList.size(); i != e; ++i) ParamTypes.push_back(ArgList[i].V->getType()); if (!FunctionType::isValidReturnType(RetType)) return Error(RetTypeLoc, "Invalid result type for LLVM function"); Ty = FunctionType::get(RetType, ParamTypes,...

Hi, I am trying to create a pdf using ruby jasper. For this I am referring this url:- http://oldwiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/howtointegratejasperreports I have done everything whatever is in that link. Still I am not able to get the pdf. I am not getting any error in log file. My log file is:- "Processing AccountController#customer_report (for 127.0.0.1 at 2009-04-27 13:19:34) [GET]

Whoops... Seems I forgot the asterisk (*) after the cast. Or something. Because I did insert the cast and it didn't work. But NOW it works. Thank you for spending some time on this - and also for presenting the solution. -- Mikael 2013/12/4 Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> > This code: > > declare i32 @printf(i8* nocapture readonly, ...) nounwind > > define

In article <301a2e78-d490-3805-e30f-41b668aac5c1 at sysnux.pf>, Jean-Denis Girard <jd.girard at sysnux.pf> wrote: > > Hi Tony, > > Le 20/07/2019 à 06:29, Tony Mountifield a écrit : > > Are there any other languages/libraries I should be considering? > > Same here, after years of AGI / AMI, I recently made my first project > using ARI on Asterisk-16. I love

...; 2. Use a cast instruction to actually perform the type cast. > > In the code I'm currently working on, I do the following to cast a > function pointer from one type to another. Hopefully the line wrapping > won't totally destroy this. > > std::vector<const Type*> paramTypes; > > // First parameter: a void pointer > paramTypes.push_back( PointerType::get( Type::getPrimitiveType( Type::SByteTyID ) ) ); > > FunctionType* pthreadFunctionType = FunctionType::get( > PointerType::get( Type::getPrimitiveType( Type::SByteTyID ) ), > param...

Hi, I'm using LLVM 2.4 (but llvm-gcc 2.2) on Ubuntu 8.10 (Intrepid Ibex) for a small part-time project combining Witty (http://www.webtoolkit.eu) and the ExecutionEngine in LLVM. (This is my second week with any of these so I still lack a lot of basic knowledge.) Sometimes I want to call a function returing a struct (in this case std::string), thus hasStructRetAttr() is true for the Function

On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:03 AM, F van der Meeren wrote: > Hello, > > I have a question, what is wrong with the following code? > > declare void @llvm.memcpy.p0i64.p0i64.i8(i64*, i64*, i8, i32, i1) nounwind > > ... > > call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i64.p0i64.i8(i64* %19, i64* %21, i8 %17, i32 0, i1 false) > > ... > > > According to the compiler this is the

...odNameSize]; // Create the methodName. memset(methodName, 0, methodNameSize); sprintf(methodName, methodNameTemplate, dstSize, srcSize, lengthSize); // Search for the function or create it. if((function = LLVMGetNamedFunction(module, methodName)) == NULL) { LLVMTypeRef paramTypes [] = { dstType, srcType, lengthType, LLVMInt32TypeInContext(context), LLVMInt1TypeInContext(context), }; functionType = LLVMFunctionType(LLVMVoidTypeInContext(context), paramTypes, numberOfArguments, false);...

Hello, I'm having troubles with writing a pass. In my pass I've have created a function that has two parameters - both of type i8*. Initially I wrote this function in C, that I translated it into IR, and then by using llc -march=cpp I got it's implementation in cpp code that actually inserts IR instructions. Then, I inserted this cpp code in my pass. And in some places of a program

I actually need this feature quite badly in my untyped language compiler: since I support first-class functions, I've made the types of all functions a standard vararg (so I can box them). The implementation crashes when I try to read out the value of gc.result. Hints as to what might be wrong? Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon at gmail.com> ---

...e; +} + +class LLVMType<ValueType vt> { + ValueType VT = vt; +} + +class Intrinsic<string name, list<LLVMType> param_types = []> { + string LLVMName = name; + bit isTarget = 0; + string TargetPrefix = ""; + list<LLVMType> RetTypes = []; + list<LLVMType> ParamTypes = param_types; + list<IntrinsicProperty> Properties = []; +} + +def iAny : ValueType<0, 254>; +def llvm_anyint_ty : LLVMType<iAny>; + +// Make sure we generate the long name without crashing +// CHECK: this_is_a_really_long_intrinsic_name_but_we_should_still_not_crash // llvm.t...

...> +} >> + >> +class Intrinsic<string name, list<LLVMType> param_types = []> { >> + string LLVMName = name; >> + bit isTarget = 0; >> + string TargetPrefix = ""; >> + list<LLVMType> RetTypes = []; >> + list<LLVMType> ParamTypes = param_types; >> + list<IntrinsicProperty> Properties = []; >> +} >> + >> +def iAny : ValueType<0, 254>; >> +def llvm_anyint_ty : LLVMType<iAny>; >> + >> +// Make sure we generate the long name without crashing >> +// CHECK: >&g...

Hello, I have a question, what is wrong with the following code? declare void @llvm.memcpy.p0i64.p0i64.i8(i64*, i64*, i8, i32, i1) nounwind ... call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i64.p0i64.i8(i64* %19, i64* %21, i8 %17, i32 0, i1 false) ... According to the compiler this is the error, but I seem to miss where exactly my fault is. Intrinsic prototype has incorrect number of arguments! void (i64*,

Hello! I am coming back to the below discussion again, regarding the LLVM support of Ruby dynamics. The initial problem description is as follow, to refresh your memory :) After that my questions come: -----------BEGIN Initial problem description--------------- Problem is though, that the Ruby compiler is integrated in the compilation of the program being executed, to be able to parse &

...path.o ./boost/filesystem/src/utf8_codecvt_facet.o ./boost/chrono/src/chrono.o ./boost/chrono/src/process_cpu_clocks.o ./boost/chrono/src/thread_clock.o ./pwiz/data/msdata/Version.o ./pwiz/data/common/MemoryIndex.o ./pwiz/data/common/CVTranslator.o ./pwiz/data/common/cv.o ./pwiz/data/common/ParamTypes.o ./pwiz/data/common/BinaryIndexStream.o ./pwiz/data/common/diff_std.o ./pwiz/data/common/Unimod.o ./pwiz/data/msdata/SpectrumList_MGF.o ./pwiz/data/msdata/DefaultReaderList.o ./pwiz/data/msdata/ChromatogramList_mzML.o ./pwiz/data/msdata/examples.o ./pwiz/data/msdata/Serializer_mzML.o ./pwi...

Okay after translating the headers to Delphi, i found more inconsistencies: > LLVMTypeRef LLVMFunctionType(LLVMTypeRef ReturnType, > LLVMTypeRef *ParamTypes, unsigned ParamCount, > LLVMBool IsVarArg); > In this case it is the other way around. 0 means False and anything else means true :/ (so it acts more like a "traditional" bool) 2016-09-12 11:17 GMT+02:00 Alexander Benikowski <sebal007 at googlemail....

Thanks! Problem is though, that the Ruby compiler is integrated in the compilation of the program being executed, to be able to parse & compile dynamic code at run-time. Therefore the calls to ExecutionEngine::getPointerToGlobal(F) need to be made in LLVM code. Here is a detailed simplistic example in pseudocode of what we want to do: First Ruby code is entered at run-time, received as a

Of course, this is normal for C-APIs. But maybe change the name to LLVMResult to propagate the real use? I am not arguing about the results themself. They are standard. But the name is missguiding. As long as it's consistent i know that i have to write an extra record operator in Delphi to reflect this. 2016-09-12 11:11 GMT+02:00 David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk>: > On