Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "parameterless".
2009 Jul 22
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM and Interrupt Service Routines.
...pport for Ada in LLVM is complete, I would look to
> see if there is something that is done there. Ada provides two pragmas
> (Interrupt_Handler & Attach_Handler) which allow you to both statically
> and dynamically attach interrupts to procedures.
the interrupt handler itself is a parameterless procedure that does not
return a value. As such, I guess calling conventions and so forth are
not very relevant for it :) In any case llvm-gcc and gcc mainline seem
to output the interrupt handler as an ordinary function on x86-32-linux.
Ciao,
Duncan.
2009 Jul 24
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM and Interrupt Service Routines.
Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> writes:
> the interrupt handler itself is a parameterless procedure that does not
> return a value. As such, I guess calling conventions and so forth are
> not very relevant for it :) In any case llvm-gcc and gcc mainline seem
> to output the interrupt handler as an ordinary function on
> x86-32-linux.
There can be significant differences b...
2009 Jul 21
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM and Interrupt Service Routines.
Hi Sanjiv,
Assuming that that support for Ada in LLVM is complete, I would look
to see if there is something that is done there. Ada provides two
pragmas (Interrupt_Handler & Attach_Handler) which allow you to both
statically and dynamically attach interrupts to procedures.
Alex Karahalios
On Jul 21, 2009, at 8:07 AM, <Sanjiv.Gupta at microchip.com> <Sanjiv.Gupta at
2009 Jul 24
4
[LLVMdev] LLVM and Interrupt Service Routines.
On Jul 24, 2009, at 8:47 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote:
> Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> writes:
>
>> the interrupt handler itself is a parameterless procedure that does
>> not
>> return a value. As such, I guess calling conventions and so forth
>> are
>> not very relevant for it :) In any case llvm-gcc and gcc mainline
>> seem
>> to output the interrupt handler as an ordinary function on
>> x86-...
2009 Jul 21
7
[LLVMdev] LLVM and Interrupt Service Routines.
Hi,
Apparently, there is no explicit support for ISRs in the llvm framework. I could not find a matching attribute that can be used to mark a function as an ISR, which codegen and optimizer can use accordingly. ISRs aren't called explicity from any function, so currently the optimizer deletes them. We are planning to introduce a new "interrupt" attribute (to be modeled similiar to