search for: paralleli

...ch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 06/11/2020 4:47 p.m., Balamuta, James Joseph wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Henrik Bengtsson has done some fantastic work with {future} and, more importantly, greatly improved constructing and deconstructing a parallelized environment within R. It was with great joy that I saw Henrik slowly split off some functionality of {future} into {parallelly} package. Reading over the package?s README, he states: >>> >>>> The functions and features added to this package are written to be backward compati...

On 06/11/2020 4:47 p.m., Balamuta, James Joseph wrote: > Hi all, > > Henrik Bengtsson has done some fantastic work with {future} and, more importantly, greatly improved constructing and deconstructing a parallelized environment within R. It was with great joy that I saw Henrik slowly split off some functionality of {future} into {parallelly} package. Reading over the package?s README, he states: > >> The functions and features added to this package are written to be backward compatible with the pa...

i have a parallel port dongle which i need to run a specific software. i have managed to do the following but the dongle is still recognised. i [user at localhost ~]$ ls -al ~/.wine/dosdevices total 8 drwxrwxr-x 2 user guest 4096 2009-05-29 07:43 ./ drwxrwxr-x 4 user guest 4096 2009-05-29 08:08 ../ lrwxrwxrwx 1 user guest 10 2009-05-28 14:56 c: -> ../drive_c/ lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8

Hi all, Henrik Bengtsson has done some fantastic work with {future} and, more importantly, greatly improved constructing and deconstructing a parallelized environment within R. It was with great joy that I saw Henrik slowly split off some functionality of {future} into {parallelly} package. Reading over the package?s README, he states: > The functions and features added to this package are written to be backward compatible with the parallel pa...

...7 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 06/11/2020 4:47 p.m., Balamuta, James Joseph wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Henrik Bengtsson has done some fantastic work with {future} and, more importantly, greatly improved constructing and deconstructing a parallelized environment within R. It was with great joy that I saw Henrik slowly split off some functionality of {future} into {parallelly} package. Reading over the package?s README, he states: > > > >> The functions and features added to this package are written to be backward compatible wi...

I have an R script that consists of a for loop that repeats a process for many different files. I want to process this parallely on machine with multiple cores, is there any package for it ? Thanks -- Sandeep R Patil [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Has anyone tried to connect parallely to an analog PBX system? __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com

Hi everyone, I'm trying to use apply (with a call to zoo's rollapply within) on the columns of a 1.5Kx165K matrix, and I'd like to make use of the other cores on my machine to speed it up. (And hopefully also leave more memory free: I find that after I create a big object like this, I have to save my workspace and then close and reopen R to be able to recover memory tied up by R, but

I''m looking to get parallels or vmware for my imac. Wondering what ppls opinions are. Besides web broswers I need to run some windows only stuff, and wondering about running MS Office Opinions? Thanx Daniel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to

I think the subject says it all. I want to make a simple lattice plot, using xyplot with the argument type=c("l","a"). The problem then is that in the resulting plot it is difficult/impossible to see which plot corresponds to the average and which to the individual profiles. I triedthings like extra arguments lwd=c(1,3) or col=c("blue","red") hoping

Hi, every body! I am a new comer for R, so my question would unavoidablely sounds stupid. Sorry! in my experiment, there are two type of soil ( soil F and soil D), each half of them were subjected to steam sterilize (result in FS and DS soil). A equal volume of soil from two of the four soil types (F, D, FS, DS) were mixed as follows: F+F, F+D, F+FS, F+DS, D+F, D+FS, D+DS, FS+DS (eight treatment).

Hi Friends, I think lot of changes have been made from rsync 2.6.0 to V3. The one major change is rsync V3 will not walk complete file system first and then start the synching but it will parallely start synching as well along with file system walking. Could any one tell me which source files got affected with this change. I think it should be using more threads now. Thanks, Jignesh

Hello Friends, Could any atleast one tell me how rsync walk the complete File System and when it start actual synching? Thanks, Jignesh On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Jignesh Shah <jignesh.shah1980@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Friends, > > I think lot of changes have been made from rsync 2.6.0 to V3. The one major > change is rsync V3 will not walk complete file system first and

Hi, I observed following behaviour. When I'm writing big (200MB+) files to samba share from Windows XP then writing speed is slow. Reading of these files (written from Windows XP) is very slow too. I found that it is caused by framgentation of this file [observed by using debuge2fs]. I tried to figure out what causes this framemtation and it seems that Windows XP is trying to do some

Hi, Why is seekability necessary in case of multiplexed multiple logical streams? Isn't the differentiation based on serial number sufficient to continue decoding of pages in the sequence of their arrival? Regards, Patrick. _______________________________________________________________________ Odomos - the only mosquito protection outside 4 walls - Click here to know more!

Now multi-core machines are more widely available, we have gotten to stress-test the parallel building capabilities of R and of packages. The current Windows and Mac build machines are both 8-core and I test on an 8-core machine. These are all fairly recent changes of hardware and the following applies only to R-devel, the version to become 2.9.0 next month. Parallel builds of R under

Hi All, I am trying to program the 'Tremor' decoder onto an array of Processors. I am using four Processors. I did this experiment: I split the while(!eof){} in the main() in to four tasks using if(!eof) statements. In this modification, each if() decodes one packet of data at-a-time, sequentially. Then, I ran the code on a single Processor and the decoding was successful. The

Hi, i''m going to implement a syndication-service, which will get lists in xml with some meta-data an enclosed video files, which will get encoded at the end. The syndication run will be startet every five minutes of a full hour. So i thought to build 4 Worker. One for checking which feeds to syndicate (syndication_worker) at a specific time, one for processing the list

Hi, every body! I am a new comer for R, so my question would unavoidablely sounds stupid. Sorry! In my experiment, there are two type of soil ( soil F and soil D), each half of them were subjected to steam sterilize (result in FS and DS soil). A equal volume of soil from two of the four soil types (F, D, FS, DS) were mixed as follows: F+F, F+D, F+FS, F+DS, D+F, D+FS, D+DS, FS+DS (eight

I'm a beginner in R, and trying to fit linear models with different intercepts per group, of the type y ~ A*x1 + B, where x1 is a numerical variable. I cannot understand whether I should use y1 ~ x1 +1 or y1 ~ order(x1) + 1 Although in the toy example included it makes a small difference, in models with many groups the models without order() converge slower if at all!