Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "parallel_for_".
Did you mean:
parallel_for
2018 Feb 15
0
[RFC] [lld] Replace use of 'concurrency::parallel_for_each' with standard library
...we just delete the ifdefs? We
could in theory disable it just for debug builds, but that could create
some hard to reproduce bugs.
Cheers,
Rafael
Owen Reynolds via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes:
> Hello all,
>
> Last year I submitted a bug regarding the use of 'parallel_for_each' and
> Windows Concurrency Library. We have found that when compiling in Visual
> Studio 2015 and 2017 with /MTd, the use of 'concurrency::parallel_for_each'
> can cause unhandled exceptions when the program is exiting.
>
> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34976...
2018 Feb 15
3
[RFC] [lld] Replace use of 'concurrency::parallel_for_each' with standard library
Hello all,
Last year I submitted a bug regarding the use of 'parallel_for_each' and
Windows Concurrency Library. We have found that when compiling in Visual
Studio 2015 and 2017 with /MTd, the use of 'concurrency::parallel_for_each'
can cause unhandled exceptions when the program is exiting.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34976
After having some diffi...