Displaying 20 results from an estimated 29 matches for "paralleizing".
Did you mean:
parallelizing
2020 Nov 07
0
Process to Incorporate Functions from {parallely} into base R's {parallel} package
If these are easy changes, maybe someone will incorporate them. You'll
make the argument stronger for doing that if you can explain why it's
better to do that than to keep them in parallely.
Duncan Murdoch
On 07/11/2020 1:39 p.m., Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> FWIW, there are indeed a few low hanging bug fixes in 'parallelly'
> that should be easy to incorporate into
2020 Nov 07
0
Process to Incorporate Functions from {parallely} into base R's {parallel} package
On 06/11/2020 4:47 p.m., Balamuta, James Joseph wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Henrik Bengtsson has done some fantastic work with {future} and, more importantly, greatly improved constructing and deconstructing a parallelized environment within R. It was with great joy that I saw Henrik slowly split off some functionality of {future} into {parallelly} package. Reading over the package?s README, he
2009 May 29
4
paralle port dongle
i have a parallel port dongle which i need to run a specific software.
i have managed to do the following but the dongle is still recognised.
i [user at localhost ~]$ ls -al ~/.wine/dosdevices
total 8
drwxrwxr-x 2 user guest 4096 2009-05-29 07:43 ./
drwxrwxr-x 4 user guest 4096 2009-05-29 08:08 ../
lrwxrwxrwx 1 user guest 10 2009-05-28 14:56 c: -> ../drive_c/
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8
2020 Nov 06
2
Process to Incorporate Functions from {parallely} into base R's {parallel} package
Hi all,
Henrik Bengtsson has done some fantastic work with {future} and, more importantly, greatly improved constructing and deconstructing a parallelized environment within R. It was with great joy that I saw Henrik slowly split off some functionality of {future} into {parallelly} package. Reading over the package?s README, he states:
> The functions and features added to this package are
2020 Nov 07
2
Process to Incorporate Functions from {parallely} into base R's {parallel} package
FWIW, there are indeed a few low hanging bug fixes in 'parallelly'
that should be easy to incorporate into 'parallel' without adding
extra maintenance. For example, in parallel::makePSOCKcluster(), it
is not possible to disable SSH option '-l USER' so that it can be set
in ~/.ssh/config. The remote user name will be the user name of your
local machine and if you try to
2011 Oct 11
2
Parallel processing for R loop
I have an R script that consists of a for loop
that repeats a process for many different files.
I want to process this parallely on machine with
multiple cores, is there any package for it ?
Thanks
--
Sandeep R Patil
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2003 May 14
5
Asterisk - Connction to analog PBX?
Has anyone tried to connect parallely to an analog PBX system?
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
2013 May 03
2
how to parallelize 'apply' across multiple cores on a Mac
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to use apply (with a call to zoo's rollapply within) on the
columns of a 1.5Kx165K matrix, and I'd like to make use of the other cores
on my machine to speed it up. (And hopefully also leave more memory free: I
find that after I create a big object like this, I have to save my
workspace and then close and reopen R to be able to recover memory tied up
by R, but
2007 Aug 10
16
[OT] Parallels or VMWare?
I''m looking to get parallels or vmware for my imac. Wondering what ppls
opinions are.
Besides web broswers I need to run some windows only stuff, and wondering
about running MS Office
Opinions?
Thanx
Daniel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to
2009 Nov 26
1
lattice --- different properties of lines corresponding to type=c("l", "a") respectively
I think the subject says it all. I want to make a simple lattice plot,
using xyplot with the
argument type=c("l","a").
The problem then is that in the resulting plot it is
difficult/impossible to see which plot corresponds to the average
and which to the individual profiles. I triedthings like extra
arguments lwd=c(1,3) or col=c("blue","red")
hoping
2009 Mar 04
0
(no subject)
Hi, every body!
I am a new comer for R, so my question would unavoidablely sounds stupid. Sorry!
in my experiment, there are two type of soil ( soil F and soil D), each half of them were subjected to steam sterilize (result in FS and DS soil). A equal volume of soil from two of the four soil types (F, D, FS, DS) were mixed as follows: F+F, F+D, F+FS, F+DS, D+F, D+FS, D+DS, FS+DS (eight treatment).
2008 Dec 04
0
changes in rsync V3
Hi Friends,
I think lot of changes have been made from rsync 2.6.0 to V3. The one major
change is rsync V3 will not walk complete file system first and then start
the synching but it will parallely start synching as well along with file
system walking. Could any one tell me which source files got affected with
this change. I think it should be using more threads now.
Thanks,
Jignesh
2008 Dec 10
0
File System walk in rsync
Hello Friends,
Could any atleast one tell me how rsync walk the complete File System and
when it start actual synching?
Thanks,
Jignesh
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Jignesh Shah <jignesh.shah1980@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi Friends,
>
> I think lot of changes have been made from rsync 2.6.0 to V3. The one major
> change is rsync V3 will not walk complete file system first and
2006 Apr 28
0
Bad performance samba and Windows XP
Hi,
I observed following behaviour. When I'm writing big (200MB+)
files to samba share from Windows XP then writing speed is slow.
Reading of these files (written from Windows XP) is very slow too.
I found that it is caused by framgentation of this file [observed by using debuge2fs].
I tried to figure out what causes this framemtation and it seems that Windows XP
is trying to do some
2003 Mar 19
3
multiple logical streams
Hi,
Why is seekability necessary in case of multiplexed multiple
logical streams? Isn't the differentiation based on serial number
sufficient to continue decoding of pages in the sequence of their
arrival?
Regards,
Patrick.
_______________________________________________________________________
Odomos - the only mosquito protection outside 4 walls -
Click here to know more!
2009 Mar 09
0
Parallel makes
Now multi-core machines are more widely available, we have gotten to
stress-test the parallel building capabilities of R and of packages.
The current Windows and Mac build machines are both 8-core and I test
on an 8-core machine. These are all fairly recent changes of hardware
and the following applies only to R-devel, the version to become 2.9.0
next month.
Parallel builds of R under
2009 Oct 22
1
Is it possible to seek different Ogg Vorbis encoded packets from the File?
Hi All,
I am trying to program the 'Tremor' decoder onto an array of Processors.
I am using four Processors.
I did this experiment: I split the while(!eof){} in the main() in to
four tasks using if(!eof) statements. In this modification, each if()
decodes one packet of data at-a-time, sequentially. Then, I ran the code on
a single Processor and the decoding was successful. The
2008 Jan 13
3
right usage of bdrb
Hi,
i''m going to implement a syndication-service, which will get lists in
xml with some meta-data an enclosed video files, which will get encoded
at the end. The syndication run will be startet every five minutes of
a full hour.
So i thought to build 4 Worker. One for checking which feeds to
syndicate (syndication_worker) at a specific time, one for processing
the list
2009 Mar 06
2
Re peated ANOVA or nested ANOVA, or parallel one way ANOVA six times?
Hi, every body!
I am a new comer for R, so my question would unavoidablely sounds stupid.
Sorry!
In my experiment, there are two type of soil ( soil F and soil D), each half
of them were subjected to steam sterilize (result in FS and DS soil). A
equal volume of soil from two of the four soil types (F, D, FS, DS) were
mixed as follows: F+F, F+D, F+FS, F+DS, D+F, D+FS, D+DS, FS+DS (eight
2004 Nov 24
1
what does order() stand for in an lme formula?
I'm a beginner in R, and trying to fit linear models with different
intercepts per group, of the type y ~ A*x1 + B, where x1 is a numerical
variable. I cannot understand whether I should use
y1 ~ x1 +1
or
y1 ~ order(x1) + 1
Although in the toy example included it makes a small difference, in models
with many groups the models without order() converge slower if at all!