search for: pandaboards

Hi all, I'm one of the developers of the Jade project, a Jit decoder running with LLVM 2.9. We are currently testing our decoder on a pandaboard<http://pandaboard.org/> based on an OMAP 4430 and the Jit compilation seems to crash once there is a call to a function in the LLVM IR. We have already tested this issue with lli in its 2.9 version, and this bug still stays the same. LLVM

On 06/27/11 12:46 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 26 June 2011 10:16, Karel Gardas<karel.gardas at centrum.cz> wrote: >> So I'm curious what's *the* recommended compiler on this platform which >> LLVM development is using? > > Hi Karel, > > I'm not sure what test cases you're talking about, but we use > CodeSourcery's GCC and binutils (latests,

On 07/ 4/11 01:39 AM, Eli Friedman wrote: > For the JIT failures, it would be nice if you could track down the SVN > revision when it started failing. (We have an ARM buildbot at > http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-cortex-a9 , > but the JIT was already broken when it was set up.) I've used my i.MX53 board to get this, but I'm returning it today back to

Hi all, Since the 3.1 testing day is coming and be a ARM tester, I would like to make sure everything is O.K. so that we don't waste the precious time. As discussed on the ML before, I plan to cross compile LLVM/Clang first, then run regression test and test suite on the pandaboards. Could someone help me check to see if I miss something? Thanks! Here is the pandaboard configuration, --- $ uname -a Linux arm2 2.6.38-1208-omap4 #11-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Fri Apr 15 16:34:35 UTC 2011 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux $ gcc -v gcc version 4.5.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4) $ ld -v...

Hi Óscar, On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:45:23AM +0200, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > "陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen)" <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> writes: > > > I have been stuck on compiling LLVM/Clang (r163485) on pandaboard which has > > following configuration, > > > > - Ubuntu 11.04 + 1G Mem + 1G Swap + 32G SD card > > - GCC 4.5.2 > > - GNU gold

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Karel Gardas <karel.gardas at centrum.cz> wrote: > On 07/ 4/11 01:39 AM, Eli Friedman wrote: >> >> For the JIT failures, it would be nice if you could track down the SVN >> revision when it started failing.  (We have an ARM buildbot at >> http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-cortex-a9 , >> but the JIT was

Hi all, I have been stuck on compiling LLVM/Clang (r163485) on pandaboard which has following configuration, - Ubuntu 11.04 + 1G Mem + 1G Swap + 32G SD card - GCC 4.5.2 - GNU gold (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu 2.21.0.20110327) 1.11 The compiling process stucks on linking llc, I am pretty surprised on this. Anyone has similar issue or any idea? Thanks! Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)

Hello LLVM Devs, Thanks for helping me previously to cross-compile for ARM, I managed to get a working toolchain and am currently having fun compiling different toy problems and running them on a pandaboard. As part of my research I am trying to implement the ARM NEON Intrinsics in the PowerPC LLVM backend. I am still at the beginning of my efforts and am not yet familiar with either the ARM or

Hi Andrew, On 18/09/12 11:21, David Tweed wrote: > in particular there are some regression tests of interesting things > -- such as profiling -- that fail purely because the default old JIT > doesn't work. |I've actually got LLVM currently compiling within an ARM QEmu install to |look at an assert within the ARM JIT code. Profiling tests that I |submitted a few weeks ago are

Hi Renato, Thank you very much for the directions, I am going to recommit my fix. What are hardware used in buildbots? Are these common boards like PandaBoard or some thing special? What is RAM installed? Thanks, --Serge 2014-12-11 2:36 GMT+06:00 Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>: > On 10 December 2014 at 19:06, Serge Pavlov <sepavloff at gmail.com> wrote: > > In

Hello Renato, It turned out I just didn't do the cross-compilation correctly, and Tim Northover already pointed me to a guide you have written on it ( http://clang.llvm.org/docs/CrossCompilation.html), so I will read that before continuing with my efforts. To answer your question I am testing on a pandaboard currently, which has an arm cortex-a9 processor, which I think is 64-bit. I am much

Hello, A new clang builder added to osusl buildbot: http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-cortex-a9 It's pandaboard with cortex-a9 runnibg Ubuntu 11.04. It builds Ok, but few test fail and need attention. Please take a look and let me know if someone will need more information or intermediate files to fix that. Thanks Galina

Hello, I'm trying to find myself, but anyway, I'm curious what's the recommended GNU C++ version for LLVM compilation on ARM/Linux platform? I'm using various version of Ubuntu and so far the best compiler I found was 4.4.1 (Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu9)[1]. With this and with just -O1 as optimize option I've been able to get to 1 failing testcase. Other tested were 4.4.3 and

On 26 June 2011 10:16, Karel Gardas <karel.gardas at centrum.cz> wrote: > So I'm curious what's *the* recommended compiler on this platform which > LLVM development is using? Hi Karel, I'm not sure what test cases you're talking about, but we use CodeSourcery's GCC and binutils (latests, not stable, because of new core support) and it works a treat. You can

...Since the 3.1 testing day is coming and be a ARM tester, I would like to > make > sure everything is O.K. so that we don't waste the precious time. As > discussed > on the ML before, I plan to cross compile LLVM/Clang first, then run > regression > test and test suite on the pandaboards. Could someone help me check to see > if I > miss something? Thanks! > Ubuntu on ARM is softfp, right? How about testing hardfp with a distribution like ArchLinuxArm? > Here is the pandaboard configuration, > > --- > $ uname -a > Linux arm2 2.6.38-1208-omap4 #11-Ubuntu...

Hi Chris, > The right place to implement this is in lib/Support/Host.cpp. X86 has an implementation of sys::getHostCPUName(), but everything else just uses the: > > std::string sys::getHostCPUName() { > return "generic"; > } > > implementation. I tried to let it return "armv7l" or "cortex-a9" on pandaboard, but the bitcode output by clang

"陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen)" <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> writes: > I have been stuck on compiling LLVM/Clang (r163485) on pandaboard which has > following configuration, > > - Ubuntu 11.04 + 1G Mem + 1G Swap + 32G SD card > - GCC 4.5.2 > - GNU gold (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu 2.21.0.20110327) 1.11 > > The compiling process stucks on linking llc, I am pretty

> Yep, this is the issue. Running on an ARM pandaboard I can confirm that it's > due > to issues with the old JIT in general which are fixed in MCJIT, and nothing > to do > with the profiling code being tested, as discussed in this thread: > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120910/150406. > html I don't see this patch get

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:45:23AM +0200, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > "陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen)" <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> writes: > > > I have been stuck on compiling LLVM/Clang (r163485) on pandaboard which has > > following configuration, > > > > - Ubuntu 11.04 + 1G Mem + 1G Swap + 32G SD card > > - GCC 4.5.2 > > - GNU gold (GNU

On 26 September 2013 17:52, Stanislav Manilov <stanislav.manilov at gmail.com>wrote: > To answer your question I am testing on a pandaboard currently, which has > an arm cortex-a9 processor, which I think is 64-bit. > Cortex-A9 is still 32-bits, so you'll have all support you need. ;) however it doesn't if I remove the -ffreestanding flag. I need to figure > this out