search for: pana53

...roughput can get about 391 MB/s. However, cifs over glusterfs aggregate throughput only can get about 180 MB/s. Why CIFS performance is so slow over glusterfs backend? Anybody meet such issues and how to resolve(samba and glusterfs parameters)? thanks a lot in advance. #test local ext4 [root at pana53 5f4554cf-3b56-43e5-847e-cb409b0edc30]# dd if=/dev/zero of=dd.dat bs=1MB count=10k 10240+0 records in 10240+0 records out 10240000000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 21.4764 s, 477 MB/s #test local glusterfs [root at pana53 61659a17-69bd-4704-81fe-0853f1c891cd]# dd if=/dev/zero of=dd.dat bs=1MB count=10k...

...roughput can get about 391 MB/s. However, cifs over glusterfs aggregate throughput only can get about 180 MB/s. Why CIFS performance is so slow over glusterfs backend? Anybody meet such issues and how to resolve(samba and glusterfs parameters)? thanks a lot in advance. #test local ext4 [root at pana53 5f4554cf-3b56-43e5-847e-cb409b0edc30]# dd if=/dev/zero of=dd.dat bs=1MB count=10k 10240+0 records in 10240+0 records out 10240000000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 21.4764 s, 477 MB/s #test local glusterfs [root at pana53 61659a17-69bd-4704-81fe-0853f1c891cd]# dd if=/dev/zero of=dd.dat bs=1MB count=10k...

Hi folks, We found that samba performance downgrade a lot with glusterfs backend. volume info as followed, Volume Name: vol1 Type: Distribute Status: Started Number of Bricks: 1 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: pana53:/data/ Options Reconfigured: auth.allow: 192.168.* features.quota: on nfs.disable: on Use dd (bs=1MB) or iozone (block=1MB) to test write performance, about 400MB/s. #dd if=/dev/zero of=dd.dat bs=1MB count=1k 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1024000000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 2.6142 s, 392 MB/...