search for: paljenczy

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "paljenczy".

2017 Aug 25
2
Are r2dtable and C_r2dtable behaving correctly?
...p://www.jstor.org/stable/2346669 When I start reading it, indeed the algorithm seems start from the expected value of a cell entry and then "explore from there"... and I do wonder if there is not a flaw somewhere in the algorithm: I've now found that a bit more than a year ago, 'paljenczy' found on SO https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37309276/r-r2dtable-contingency-tables-are-too-concentrated that indeed the generated tables seem to be too much around the mean. Basically his example: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37309276/r-r2dtable-contingency-tables-are-too-concent...
2017 Aug 25
0
Are r2dtable and C_r2dtable behaving correctly?
...p://www.jstor.org/stable/2346669 When I start reading it, indeed the algorithm seems start from the expected value of a cell entry and then "explore from there"... and I do wonder if there is not a flaw somewhere in the algorithm: I've now found that a bit more than a year ago, 'paljenczy' found on SO https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37309276/r-r2dtable-contingency-tables-are-too-concentrated that indeed the generated tables seem to be too much around the mean. Basically his example: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37309276/r-r2dtable-contingency-tables-are-too-concent...
2017 Aug 24
3
Are r2dtable and C_r2dtable behaving correctly?
Hello, While doing some enrichment tests using chisq.test() with simulated p-values, I noticed some strange behaviour. The computed p-value was extremely small, so I decided to dig a little deeper and debug chisq.test(). I noticed then that the simulated statistics returned by the following call tmp <- .Call(C_chisq_sim, sr, sc, B, E) were all the same, very small numbers. This, at first,
2017 Aug 25
0
Are r2dtable and C_r2dtable behaving correctly?
...t; > When I start reading it, indeed the algorithm seems start from the > expected value of a cell entry and then "explore from there"... > and I do wonder if there is not a flaw somewhere in the > algorithm: > > I've now found that a bit more than a year ago, 'paljenczy' found on SO > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37309276/r-r2dtable-contingency-tables-are-too-concentrated > that indeed the generated tables seem to be too much around the mean. > Basically his example: > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37309276/r-r2dtable-contingenc...