Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "paljenczy".
2017 Aug 25
2
Are r2dtable and C_r2dtable behaving correctly?
...p://www.jstor.org/stable/2346669
When I start reading it, indeed the algorithm seems start from the
expected value of a cell entry and then "explore from there"...
and I do wonder if there is not a flaw somewhere in the
algorithm:
I've now found that a bit more than a year ago, 'paljenczy' found on SO
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37309276/r-r2dtable-contingency-tables-are-too-concentrated
that indeed the generated tables seem to be too much around the mean.
Basically his example:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37309276/r-r2dtable-contingency-tables-are-too-concent...
2017 Aug 25
0
Are r2dtable and C_r2dtable behaving correctly?
...p://www.jstor.org/stable/2346669
When I start reading it, indeed the algorithm seems start from the
expected value of a cell entry and then "explore from there"...
and I do wonder if there is not a flaw somewhere in the
algorithm:
I've now found that a bit more than a year ago, 'paljenczy' found on SO
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37309276/r-r2dtable-contingency-tables-are-too-concentrated
that indeed the generated tables seem to be too much around the mean.
Basically his example:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37309276/r-r2dtable-contingency-tables-are-too-concent...
2017 Aug 24
3
Are r2dtable and C_r2dtable behaving correctly?
Hello,
While doing some enrichment tests using chisq.test() with simulated
p-values, I noticed some strange behaviour. The computed p-value was
extremely small, so I decided to dig a little deeper and debug
chisq.test(). I noticed then that the simulated statistics returned by the
following call
tmp <- .Call(C_chisq_sim, sr, sc, B, E)
were all the same, very small numbers. This, at first,
2017 Aug 25
0
Are r2dtable and C_r2dtable behaving correctly?
...t;
> When I start reading it, indeed the algorithm seems start from the
> expected value of a cell entry and then "explore from there"...
> and I do wonder if there is not a flaw somewhere in the
> algorithm:
>
> I've now found that a bit more than a year ago, 'paljenczy' found on SO
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37309276/r-r2dtable-contingency-tables-are-too-concentrated
> that indeed the generated tables seem to be too much around the mean.
> Basically his example:
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37309276/r-r2dtable-contingenc...