search for: palindromic

Warren Young wrote: > The new rules are: > > 1. At least 8 characters. > > 2. Nothing that violates the pwquality rules: > > http://linux.die.net/man/8/pam_pwquality The 7 rules listed in this URL seem utterly bizarre to me. The first is "Don't use a palindrome" which makes me wonder if the author knows the meaning of this word. I suspect he/she thinks

On 2015-02-03, Scott Robbins <scottro at nyc.rr.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:53:45PM +0000, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> >> The first is "Don't use a palindrome" >> which makes me wonder if the author knows the meaning of this word. >> I suspect he/she thinks it means "a known word backwards". > > That's what I would call

Scott Robbins wrote: > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:53:45PM +0000, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> >> The 7 rules listed in this URL seem utterly bizarre to me. >> >> The first is "Don't use a palindrome" >> which makes me wonder if the author knows the meaning of this word. >> I suspect he/she thinks it means "a known word backwards". >

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Scott Robbins <scottro at nyc.rr.com> wrote: >> >> I don't think anybody is missing anything. "Palindrome" in this context >> may not be limited to real words; the author may be suggesting that you >> not pick your password by picking a real word and tacking on its >> reverse to make a palindrome, e.g.,

On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 07:52:53AM -0800, Keith Keller wrote: > On 2015-02-03, Scott Robbins <scottro at nyc.rr.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:53:45PM +0000, Timothy Murphy wrote: > >> > >> The first is "Don't use a palindrome" > >> which makes me wonder if the author knows the meaning of this word. > >> I suspect he/she

On Tue, February 3, 2015 11:37 am, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Scott Robbins <scottro at nyc.rr.com> wrote: >>> >>> I don't think anybody is missing anything. "Palindrome" in this >>> context >>> may not be limited to real words; the author may be suggesting that you >>> not pick your password by

Hi, we are running Samba 2.2.5 using LDAP und pam_ldap (pam_unix2 with auth+account+password=use_ldap) as PDC out of the SuSE 8.1 distribution. It runs very well: Login f?r Unix&Samba ok, Passwort-Change for Samba via smbpasswd Ok and we are able to manipulate the Linux Password in LDAP using the GQ Client. The only thing that doesn't work is "passwd" itself: venezuela:/home/tdm

System: Linux 2.4.25, glibc-2.3.2, gcc-3.2.3 (weird palindrome there), on a Williamette core Pentium 4 (1.6Ghz) system. I've tried both speex 1.1.5 release, and the current CVS (which self-IDs as 1.1.4), and the result is the same. I suspect some funk in the use of the SSE intrinsics macros. Backtrace: #0 0x40024594 in filter_mem2_10 (x=0x805f31c, _num=0x8061fb8, _den=0x8061fe4,

On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:53:45PM +0000, Timothy Murphy wrote: > > The 7 rules listed in this URL seem utterly bizarre to me. > > The first is "Don't use a palindrome" > which makes me wonder if the author knows the meaning of this word. > I suspect he/she thinks it means "a known word backwards". > That's what I would call it (or phrase or

Hi, I've tried the same configure options on my system and it doesn't crash. I have the same glibc and gcc 3.3.2 (can you see if a newer gcc works?). Also, could you explore a bit with different options so we can narrow it down a bit. For example, does it work with the default CFLAGS or without --vbr or --dtx. Last thing, maybe it's the file. If so, please send me the smallest sample

...rm for that series. I have done that using the function fft from stats package. However I am not sure whether the result I am getting is correct or not. Seems that the first value of the Fourier Transform list is the sum of all elements of the given series and all the following numbers represent a palindromic series for some how. I have never used a Fourier Transform before and I don't know whether that is how it should work or not. Could anyone help me with that or give me some suggestions, please? Thank you ever so much, Renata ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.virg...

Dear All, I have recently installed CentOS 5 and is workin perfect i recently download n installed poppassd daemon ver 1.6a so as to let the users to change their password but when i try to change password i get the folling error 500 'BAD PASSWORD: it is based on a dictionary word' i tried googlin arround and tried to play with system-auth-ac file in /etc/pam.d but no use my

Forbes.com - Magazine Article <http://www.forbes.com/technology/2007/08/02/voip-security-flaws-tech-internet-cx_ag_0802techvoip.html> LAS VEGAS - Internet Security VoIP Vandals Andy Greenberg, 08.02.07, 12:32 AM ET Internet telephone services like Skype and Vonage are starting to look less like digital gimmicks and more like the next generation of voice communication. They're cheaper

Hello, I have calculated the fourier transform of the series enclosed at the end of this message, by doing: library(stats) x <- readLines("file1.txt") x.num <- as.numeric(x) ft.x.num <- fft(x.num) My question is: why is the first value (Real) of ft.x.num that big? (954.833870) all the other values are much smaller. Am I doing something wrong? Could you please help me to

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >> > Let?s flip it around: what?s your justification *for* weak passwords? > You don't need to write them down. Or trust some 3rd party password keeper to keep them. Whereas when 'not weak' is determined by someone else in the middle of trying to complete something, you are very likely to

Hi r-users, I want to use the sn package but I got the following message: > install.packages(repos=NULL,pkgs="c:\\Tinn-R\\sn_0.4-12.zip") Warning: package 'sn' is in use and will not be installed updating HTML package descriptions I did tried to do it a few times but it gives the same message.  ________________________________ From: