search for: palindrom

Warren Young wrote: > The new rules are: > > 1. At least 8 characters. > > 2. Nothing that violates the pwquality rules: > > http://linux.die.net/man/8/pam_pwquality The 7 rules listed in this URL seem utterly bizarre to me. The first is "Don't use a palindrome" which makes me wonder if the author knows the meaning of this word. I suspect he/she thinks it means "a known word backwards". Of the remaing 6 rules one is optional ("repeated characters") and 3 of the remaining 5 concern similarity to previous passwords. Of the remain...

On 2015-02-03, Scott Robbins <scottro at nyc.rr.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:53:45PM +0000, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> >> The first is "Don't use a palindrome" >> which makes me wonder if the author knows the meaning of this word. >> I suspect he/she thinks it means "a known word backwards". > > That's what I would call it (or phrase or sequence of numbers.) When I > read your post, I thought I was missing someth...

Scott Robbins wrote: > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:53:45PM +0000, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> >> The 7 rules listed in this URL seem utterly bizarre to me. >> >> The first is "Don't use a palindrome" >> which makes me wonder if the author knows the meaning of this word. >> I suspect he/she thinks it means "a known word backwards". > That's what I would call it (or phrase or sequence of numbers.) When I > read your post, I thought I was missing something,...

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Scott Robbins <scottro at nyc.rr.com> wrote: >> >> I don't think anybody is missing anything. "Palindrome" in this context >> may not be limited to real words; the author may be suggesting that you >> not pick your password by picking a real word and tacking on its >> reverse to make a palindrome, e.g., "password1drowssap". >> > > Ah, that makes sense then,...

On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 07:52:53AM -0800, Keith Keller wrote: > On 2015-02-03, Scott Robbins <scottro at nyc.rr.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:53:45PM +0000, Timothy Murphy wrote: > >> > >> The first is "Don't use a palindrome" > >> which makes me wonder if the author knows the meaning of this word. > >> I suspect he/she thinks it means "a known word backwards". > > > > That's what I would call it (or phrase or sequence of numbers.) When I > > read your post, I tho...

On Tue, February 3, 2015 11:37 am, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Scott Robbins <scottro at nyc.rr.com> wrote: >>> >>> I don't think anybody is missing anything. "Palindrome" in this >>> context >>> may not be limited to real words; the author may be suggesting that you >>> not pick your password by picking a real word and tacking on its >>> reverse to make a palindrome, e.g., "password1drowssap". >>> >&gt...

...ange for Samba via smbpasswd Ok and we are able to manipulate the Linux Password in LDAP using the GQ Client. The only thing that doesn't work is "passwd" itself: venezuela:/home/tdm # passwd guest Changing password for guest. Enter login(LDAP) password: New password: Bad password: a palindrome Re-enter new password: LDAP password information update failed: Unknown error Password changed venezuela:/home/tdm # and in /var/log/messages: Jan 28 13:39:47 venezuela passwd[28505]: pam_ldap: ldap_modify_s Insufficient access Can you please help, because this is a very important issue for us!...

System: Linux 2.4.25, glibc-2.3.2, gcc-3.2.3 (weird palindrome there), on a Williamette core Pentium 4 (1.6Ghz) system. I've tried both speex 1.1.5 release, and the current CVS (which self-IDs as 1.1.4), and the result is the same. I suspect some funk in the use of the SSE intrinsics macros. Backtrace: #0 0x40024594 in filter_mem2_10 (x=0x805f31c, _n...

On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:53:45PM +0000, Timothy Murphy wrote: > > The 7 rules listed in this URL seem utterly bizarre to me. > > The first is "Don't use a palindrome" > which makes me wonder if the author knows the meaning of this word. > I suspect he/she thinks it means "a known word backwards". > That's what I would call it (or phrase or sequence of numbers.) When I read your post, I thought I was missing something, but some cu...

...with the default CFLAGS or without --vbr or --dtx. Last thing, maybe it's the file. If so, please send me the smallest sample you have that reproduces the problem. Jean-Marc Le mer 05/05/2004 à 21:32, Malcolm Baldridge a écrit : > System: Linux 2.4.25, glibc-2.3.2, gcc-3.2.3 (weird palindrome there), on a > Williamette core Pentium 4 (1.6Ghz) system. > > I've tried both speex 1.1.5 release, and the current CVS (which self-IDs as > 1.1.4), and the result is the same. > > I suspect some funk in the use of the SSE intrinsics macros. > > Backtrace: > >...

...rm for that series. I have done that using the function fft from stats package. However I am not sure whether the result I am getting is correct or not. Seems that the first value of the Fourier Transform list is the sum of all elements of the given series and all the following numbers represent a palindromic series for some how. I have never used a Fourier Transform before and I don't know whether that is how it should work or not. Could anyone help me with that or give me some suggestions, please? Thank you ever so much, Renata ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.vi...

Dear All, I have recently installed CentOS 5 and is workin perfect i recently download n installed poppassd daemon ver 1.6a so as to let the users to change their password but when i try to change password i get the folling error 500 'BAD PASSWORD: it is based on a dictionary word' i tried googlin arround and tried to play with system-auth-ac file in /etc/pam.d but no use my

..., Dempster argued. Those include vulnerability to denial of service attacks, which overload servers with thousands of simultaneous requests for data, as well as basic hacking tactics like guessing the password of users who fail to change default settings. Peter Thermos, chief technology officer of Palindrome Technologies, proved the point onstage: He played snippets of conversations recorded by snooping on VoIP calls, exploiting vulnerability in a common element in VoIP communications known as media gateway control protocol. "Using this weakness in MGCP, you can do anything like reroute or tear d...

Hello, I have calculated the fourier transform of the series enclosed at the end of this message, by doing: library(stats) x <- readLines("file1.txt") x.num <- as.numeric(x) ft.x.num <- fft(x.num) My question is: why is the first value (Real) of ft.x.num that big? (954.833870) all the other values are much smaller. Am I doing something wrong? Could you please help me to

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >> > Let?s flip it around: what?s your justification *for* weak passwords? > You don't need to write them down. Or trust some 3rd party password keeper to keep them. Whereas when 'not weak' is determined by someone else in the middle of trying to complete something, you are very likely to

...lt;- alphabetFrequency(data$sequence, baseOnly=TRUE)   data$GCsequence <- rowSums(alph_sequence[,c("G", "C")]) / rowSums(alph_sequence) in the G+C computation. It also works amazingly fast in substring extraction (substring), reverse complement (reverseComplement sequences), palindromes search (findComplementedPalindromes) and so on. Now, my bottleneck is conventional string handling, because I have not found yet how to convert DNAStringSets to vector of chars. Now, I'm doing it by:   dna <- vector()     for (i in 1:length(dnaset)) {         c(dna, toString(data$dnaset[...