Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "pagavlin".
Did you mean:
gavlin
2015 Aug 20
2
RFC: Add "operand bundles" to calls and invokes
A high level summary of the proposal as it stands right now (from my
perspective), after
incorporating Philip's suggestions:
1. Operand bundles are a way to associate a set of SSA values with a
call or invoke.
2. Operand bundles are lowered in some arbitrary bundle-tag specific
manner.
3. The optimizer can optimize around operand bundles with (roughly)
the assumption that
2015 Aug 20
2
RFC: Add "operand bundles" to calls and invokes
...andlerc at gmail.com>; Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com>; Chen Li <meloli87 at gmail.com>; Russell Hadley <rhadley at microsoft.com>; Kevin Modzelewski <kmod at dropbox.com>; Swaroop Sridhar <Swaroop.Sridhar at microsoft.com>; rudi at dropbox.com; Pat Gavlin <pagavlin at microsoft.com>; Joseph Tremoulet <jotrem at microsoft.com>; Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: Add "operand bundles" to calls and invokes
On 08/19/2015 06:09 PM, Sanjoy Das wrote:
> A high level summary of the proposal as it stands right now (from...
2015 Aug 19
2
RFC: Add "operand bundles" to calls and invokes
...n Li" <meloli87 at gmail.com>, "Russell
> Hadley" <rhadley at microsoft.com>, "Kevin Modzelewski"
> <kmod at dropbox.com>, "Swaroop Sridhar"
> <Swaroop.Sridhar at microsoft.com>, rudi at dropbox.com, "Pat Gavlin"
> <pagavlin at microsoft.com>, "Joseph Tremoulet" <jotrem at microsoft.com>,
> "Reid Kleckner" <rnk at google.com>
> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 11:38:32 PM
> Subject: Re: RFC: Add "operand bundles" to calls and invokes
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:32...
2015 Aug 10
5
RFC: Add "operand bundles" to calls and invokes
We'd like to propose a scheme to attach "operand bundles" to call and
invoke instructions. This is based on the offline discussion
mentioned in
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2015-July/088748.html.
# Motivation & Definition
Our motivation behind this is to track the state required for
deoptimization (described briefly later) through the LLVM pipeline as
a
2015 Jul 01
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] llvm-abi: A library for generating ABI-compliant LLVM IR
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 at 08:19 Stephen Cross <scross at scross.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was wondering if anyone could answer the questions in my first
> email. These were:
>
> * Why does Clang generate 8 byte alignment for 16+ byte arrays on
> x86-64, even though the AMD64 ABI seems to require 16 byte alignment?
> * Clang has some logic in