search for: paesold

Hi all, I want to do live migration of domains using DRBD block devices for synchronisation between the two Xen hosts with Xen 2.0.7. I''ve written a script ( block-drbd ) which binds / unbinds DRBD devices for specific domains (with DRBD, only one host can write on a drbd device at the same time). This script sets the current host as master (bind) or secondary (unbind) in a DRBD

...do they? I just felt uncomfortable because the log level is ERROR. Here it''s more obvious that these are really no errors: [2006-04-20 13:08:08 xend] ERROR (XendCheckpoint:227) All memory is saved [2006-04-20 13:08:08 xend] ERROR (XendCheckpoint:227) Save exit rc=0 Best Regards, Michael Paesold _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi All, Please excuse me for this somewhat a slightly uneducated explanation of a problem we are experiencing. I'm more a web developer rather than a sysadmin, and have only recently been looking at how exactly dovecot works. We're having a problem when users/groups quotas are reached on our server platform. Our platform bases quotas on groups - i.e. domains, so a single user has a user

We recently switch from up-imapd to dovecot But many users are reporting that they cannot access certain mail folders. The log file has: imap(dws): Sep 14 00:06:19 Error: File isn't in mbox format: /home/research/dws/mail/TaskDL The files in the logs are "MBX mail folders", not "ASCII English text" as are the folders that can be read under Outlook. Can anyone tell me

Hi all, I installed SLES 10.0b3 with XEN on some test-systems and created a SLES 10.0b3-image for use with domU''s. The installation and booting of this domU was no problem, but on some systems the host dom0 restarts if I generate some IP-traffic from the guest. This happens on an old AMD Athlon 1,3GHz, an old Intel P3 and an Intel desktop with P4 HT/VT/EM64T but not on an Intel

I'd like to make a suggestion. Let's drop the Alpha and come out with an official version 1.0. Here's my reasons. The 0.9x version are obsolete and people should be using the 1.0 Alpha versions which seem to me to do everything the previous versions did and more. It's as full featured and stable as all other IMAP servers and in my opinion is ready to be called 1.0. The

I''ve been brainstorming... I want to create a 2-node HA active/active cluster (In other words I want to run a handful of DomUs on one node and a handful on another). In the event of a failure I want all DomUs to fail over to the other node and start working immediately. I want absolutely no single-points-of-failure. I want to do it with free software and no special hardware. I want

Hi, I''m testing out Xen on FC4. I''m using bridging for networking, as well as iptables to firewall, configured with the standard Fedora ''system-config-security-level'' tool. However I have really strange problem with conntrack not seeming to catch outbound connections. This prevents outbound connections working from dom0. Connections from domU''s