search for: packrats

>>>>> Jeroen Ooms <jeroenooms at gmail.com> >>>>> on Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:26:19 +0200 writes: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Kevin Ushey <kevinushey at gmail.com> wrote: >> R fails to install a package from source over a pre-existing package >> when the path to that package is a symlink, rather than a directory.

I am running 3.4.3 on a windows server and I ran the code in a new session. I get a warning when running packrat::init() on a project that is located on a windows network drive. The warning I get is Warning message: cannot set reparse point 'U:/packrat5/packrat/lib-R/base', reason 'Access is denied' The error is created based inside the function .Internal(mkjunction(fr,

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >>>>>> Jeroen Ooms <jeroenooms at gmail.com> >>>>>> on Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:26:19 +0200 writes: > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Kevin Ushey <kevinushey at gmail.com> wrote: > >> R fails to install a package from source

R fails to install a package from source over a pre-existing package when the path to that package is a symlink, rather than a directory. A reproducible example to illustrate (using MASS as an example): # create a temporary R library in tempdir library <- tempfile() if (!dir.exists(library)) dir.create(library) # symlink MASS from system library to temporary library MASS

Hello, I am trying to setup a private CRAN for work (behind a firewall). The best options available include miniCRAN <https://github.com/RevolutionAnalytics/miniCRAN>, drat <https://github.com/eddelbuettel/drat> and packrat <https://rstudio.github.io/packrat/>. One problem is these packages do not automatically generate the web pages that are on the CRAN. Examples:

Hello LLVM Devs, I thought I'd weigh in on some of these non-backtracking linear time RegEx algorithms. If they're anything like the PackRat parsing algorithms they take at least 4x the amount of memory in terms of storage as the string length itself by not backtracking. That should be fine for small RegExes but it wouldn't do so well for more elaborate and long expressions. If

I've had a lot of requests for additions to the reproducible research task view that fall into a grey area (to me at least). For example, roxygen2 is a tool that broadly enable reproducibility but I see it more as a tool for better programming. I'm about to check in a new version of the task view that includes packrat and checkpoint, as they seem closer to reproducible research, but also

Changing the vapply() behavior makes sense in principle. I analyzed the CRAN code base using the R parser and found 143 instances of calling vapply with USE.NAMES=FALSE. These would need to be inspected to understand the consequences of the change. For reference: /AzureML/R/datasets.R:226 /BBmisc/R/toRangeStr.R:33 /DBI/R/DBDriver.R:205 /Kmisc/R/str_rev.R:37 /Matrix/R/diagMatrix.R:98

If I understand you correctly, you want to have a mirror of CRAN on a private server behind your firewall. Check out https://cran.rstudio.com/mirror-howto.html <https://cran.rstudio.com/mirror-howto.html> which gives instructions on how to do this. Cheers, Rainer > On 8 Jun 2017, at 23:29, Joshua Bradley <jgbradley1 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I am trying to

On Aug 23, 2009, at 9:01 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: >> 2. Use POSIX regcomp facilities. This implies importing some >> implementation of this interface, e.g., Windows. On Linux, BSD, etc. >> we would try to use the platform version if available (and non- >> buggy). > > Don't do it. > They are ridiculous slow, and posix made some really dumb choices in >

Hola Alguien sabe como descargar una lista de librerías de R en formato zipeado. Por ejemplo quiero descargar las librerías (lme4, latticeExtras, Biobase,....., etc,etc) en formato zipeado. Se que puedo hacerlo una por una desde el cran pero quisiera tener un procedimiento para hacerlo automáticamente. Prof. Julio Di Rienzo Estadística y Biometría FCA- U.N. Córdoba

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Achim Zeileis <Achim.Zeileis at uibk.ac.at> wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Max Kuhn wrote: > >> I've had a lot of requests for additions to the reproducible research >> task view that fall into a grey area (to me at least). >> >> For example, roxygen2 is a tool that broadly enable reproducibility >> but I see it more as

Hi, Both vapply() and sapply() support the 'USE.NAMES' argument. According to the man page: USE.NAMES: logical; if ?TRUE? and if ?X? is character, use ?X? as ?names? for the result unless it had names already. But if 'X' has names already and 'USE.NAMES' is FALSE, it's not clear what will happen to the names. Are they going to propagate to the result

Hi, As comments are welcome I will give my two cents and a patch suggestion :-) 2017-07-06 10:42 GMT+02:00 Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org>: > > > I have used such settings (such as un-setting R_LIBS_USER or its > predecessors) for over a decade, it just works (if you give write > permissions). It clearly helps us at work because everybody sees by > the default the

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Achim Zeileis <Achim.Zeileis at uibk.ac.at> wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Max Kuhn wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Achim Zeileis >> <Achim.Zeileis at uibk.ac.at> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Max Kuhn wrote: >>> >>>> I've had a lot of requests for additions to the

I second the motion for a Programming Tools CRAN Task View. I would also think it could contain things like Rcpp, R6, etc. -Greg > On Jan 22, 2015, at 10:20 AM, Max Kuhn <mxkuhn at gmail.com> wrote: > > I've had a lot of requests for additions to the reproducible research > task view that fall into a grey area (to me at least). > > For example, roxygen2 is a tool

On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Max Kuhn wrote: > I've had a lot of requests for additions to the reproducible research > task view that fall into a grey area (to me at least). > > For example, roxygen2 is a tool that broadly enable reproducibility > but I see it more as a tool for better programming. I'm about to check > in a new version of the task view that includes packrat and

Hi guys I noticed a few people talking about a bug where "imap" processes loop. Bruce has managed to reproduce the bug. Anyone know if this has been fixed in CVS, or is it an unfixed problem? Cheers Grahame -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Bruce Murphy <packrat at ucs.uwa.edu.au> Subject: dovecot bug case Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004

I am currently using dovecot 0.99.14p1 on OpenBSD 3.8, mbox format, procmail+sendmail MTA. I subscribe to quite a few mailing lists and currently have procmail sorting mail into the proper mboxes. I was hoping there would be some sort of retention policy feature built in to dovecot. I want to delete mail more than X days old from X folders. I have combed the documentation, list archives, and

I'm not sure what broke my samba server, but I *used* to be able to distribute patches for software to my guests from my Samba server. Some time in between, I've upgraded Linux from 2.0.30 to 2.0.32, and I've upgraded the Samba RPM from whatever to 1.9.18p7. Now, I can't even browse the share list without logging on. Any idea what gives? Does anyone have this configuration working