search for: packings

Hi all, If you take a look at the service.rb file in the win32-service repository (the new one in the toplevel repository path), I''ve got this bit of code, which succeeds, but I can''t seem to unpack the data structure properly. Did I pack it wrong to begin with? I should know this but I''m spacing out. proc_status =

On Dec 6, 2006, at 1:58 PM, Andrew Lenharth wrote: > The attached patch (gcc.patch) implements the gcc portion of packed > types. I have only tested this on a few examples, so I may be missing > some type conversions somewhere. > > The gcc patch requires llvm_extra.patch, not included in the > previous emails. > > Andrew > <llvm_extra.patch> llvm_extra.patch

I have a simple project created around a very, very simple database: one main table packs with just three rows Column | Type | Modifiers --------+-----------------------------+---------------------------------------------------- id | integer | not null default nextval(''packs_id_seq''::regclass) nombre | character

Currently the virtio_ring structure are not declared packed, but they describe an hardware like interface. We should not allow compilers to make alignments and optimizations that can be different between the guest and host compiler. I propose to declare all structures that are in shared memory as packed. Does anybody see a problem with packed? Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger

Currently the virtio_ring structure are not declared packed, but they describe an hardware like interface. We should not allow compilers to make alignments and optimizations that can be different between the guest and host compiler. I propose to declare all structures that are in shared memory as packed. Does anybody see a problem with packed? Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger

The attached patch (gcc.patch) implements the gcc portion of packed types. I have only tested this on a few examples, so I may be missing some type conversions somewhere. The gcc patch requires llvm_extra.patch, not included in the previous emails. Andrew -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: llvm_extra.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 1677 bytes

DMA-related logic is separated from the virtqueue_add_packed(). DMA address will be saved as sg->dma_address, then virtqueue_add_packed() will use it directly. Unmap operation will be simpler. The purpose of this is to facilitate subsequent support to receive dma address mapped by drivers. Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 37

I just tried to perform a yum upgrade on my CentOS 5 machine and it failed on a pm-utils >= 0.99.3-6 is needed by package hal error. I rsync my repos every night. This is the first time it's happened sudo yum -y upgrade Loading "installonlyn" plugin Loading "priorities" plugin Setting up Upgrade Process Setting up repositories updates 100%

With Winetricks, Fruity Loops seems to be working well. The only thing that is not working right now is the packs. I can't figure out why the packs aren't working. If I click on the bass pack, it produces sound; if I click on one of the choir packs, no sound is produced. Linux reads the bass pack as pcm encoded. Linux isn't able to read all the packs that aren't working.

On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 10:58?PM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 09:54:57AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 03:30:35PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 09:00:25AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 02:54:20PM +0200, Stefano

I'm a programmer, not a mathmatician. I heard about R, and I'm wondering if anyone can tell me if there is an existing R function that can help with a problem we're currently trying to find an algorithm for. If R is not the answer, but you can recommend a known algorithm, that would help a lot! I'm on a project in a retail corporation, working on a program to assist retail buyers

DMA-related logic is separated from the virtqueue_add_vring_packed() to prepare for subsequent support for premapped. DMA address will be saved as sg->dma_address, then virtqueue_add_vring_packed() will use it directly. If it is a premapped scene, the transmitted sgs should have saved DMA address in dma_address, and in virtio core, we need to pass virtqueue_map_sgs(). Signed-off-by: Xuan

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 10:28:37AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 10:03:24AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:27:08AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > > This commit introduces the support for creating packed ring. > > > All split ring specific functions are added _split suffix. > > > Some necessary stubs for packed

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 05:00:40PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Are there still plans to test the performance with vost pmd? > vhost doesn't seem to show a performance gain ... > I tried some performance tests with vhost PMD. In guest, the XDP program will return XDP_DROP directly. And in host, testpmd will do txonly fwd. When burst size is 1 and packet size is 64 in testpmd

On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 12:18:47PM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote: > This patch decrements 'next_avail_idx' count when detaching a buffer > from vq for packed ring code. Split ring code already does this in > virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_split function. This updates the > 'next_avail_idx' to the previous correct index after an unused buffer > is detatched from the vq. >

On 2019/8/9 ??2:48, Pankaj Gupta wrote: > This patch decrements 'next_avail_idx' count when detaching a buffer > from vq for packed ring code. Split ring code already does this in > virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_split function. This updates the > 'next_avail_idx' to the previous correct index after an unused buffer > is detatched from the vq. > > Signed-off-by:

On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 09:00:49AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 09:22:25AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 05:00:40PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > Are there still plans to test the performance with vost pmd? > > > vhost doesn't seem to show a performance gain ... > > > > > > > I tried

Chris Lattner wrote: > Note that packed support in LLVM is not complete yet. In > particular, here are some of the big missing pieces: > > 1. No code generators can generate vector instructions yet (SSE or > altivec, for example). This should be fairly easy to add though. > 2. The lowerpacked pass, which currently converts packed ops into their > scalar counterparts,

Is there any particular reason why ov_read() packs floats to integer PCM inline, rather than being implemented in terms of ov_read_float() and a separate packing fucntion? There are obviously many advantages doing audio manipulation on the floats before packing, but right now you have to reinvent the packing stage yourself - in a replaygain backend that I'm working on, I ended up copying

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:27:08AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > This commit introduces the support for creating packed ring. > All split ring specific functions are added _split suffix. > Some necessary stubs for packed ring are also added. > > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> I'd rather have a patch just renaming split functions, then add all packed stuff