search for: packetfence

Hi Has anybody tried to combine shorewall (instead of iptables) with packetfence? /Göran ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel proces...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=524 Summary: packetfence - IPtables-save produces output that iptables-restore cannot parse Product: iptables Version: 1.3.3 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: iptables-save...

...recomended to use 'password server = *' you can > > use a list of servers instead. I personally do not see the point of > > setting it as you are proposing, surely it is just the same as > > using '*' ? > I know. I am asking because we are using a product called packetfence > that generates an smb.conf automatically, based on configuration > provided in their web admin interface. I will take a look at packetfence. OK, done a quick scan and found this in their Administration Guide: When done with the Samba install, modify your /etc/hosts in order to add the...

On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 10:14:45 +0200 mj via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Nobody knows..? > > Or my question is unclear..? > OK, whilst it is recomended to use 'password server = *' you can use a list of servers instead. I personally do not see the point of setting it as you are proposing, surely it is just the same as using '*' ? I am also

...comended to use 'password server = *' > you can use a > > list of servers instead. I personally do not see the point > of setting > > it as you are proposing, surely it is just the same as using '*' ? > I know. I am asking because we are using a product called packetfence > that generates an smb.conf automatically, based on configuration > provided in their web admin interface. > > The config that packetfence generates includes the line > > password server = samba4.domain.com > > I asked them why that is, and if it's perhaps better t...

...e: > OK, whilst it is recomended to use 'password server = *' you can use a > list of servers instead. I personally do not see the point of setting > it as you are proposing, surely it is just the same as using '*' ? I know. I am asking because we are using a product called packetfence that generates an smb.conf automatically, based on configuration provided in their web admin interface. The config that packetfence generates includes the line > password server = samba4.domain.com I asked them why that is, and if it's perhaps better to remove it, so their config will...

...usd.local, uuu-dc05.usd.local, uuu-dc02.usd.local, uuu-dc03.usd.local, uuu-dc06.usd.local, * log level = 1 winbind:5 auth:3 Best regards, -- Louis Munro lmunro at inverse.ca :: www.inverse.ca +1.514.447.4918 x125 :: +1 (866) 353-6153 x125 Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org)

Does anyone know about some free (as in beer, and maybe as in speech) software which would implement authentication and authorization of a user prior to issuing a valid dhcp lease? I imagine the following scenario: someone walks into my office building with a laptop (a colleague, a visitor, a guest, whoever), and hooks up onto the local net (wired or wireless). The server detects an unknown

...the motivation mentions Asterisk :-) From InfoWorld site: "Award winners in network and network management are old favorites Cacti and Nagios, the IPCop firewall, Kamailio SIP proxy server, KeePass password manager, Openfiler SAN/NAS appliance, OpenNMS enterprise monitoring system, PacketFence network access control solution, Puppet configuration management framework, and Untangle network security gateway." "Kamailio is the open source SIP proxy server formerly known as OpenSER. Used with an Asterisk IP PBX server for phone features, plus a hardware gateway for connect...

Has anyone managed to authenticate centos 5 on wired ethernet. I tried with wpa_supplicant but i won't work. Any help would be appreciated. Thanx.

Hi, We have integrated CISCO ISE with Samba-AD. However we are receiving the below error. “Authentication encountered an error due to the network, AD DNS misconfiguration. This may be a temporary error” However the AD Log reports the authentication is successful. I saw a bug reported at*/https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892.

Some interesting developments coming: <http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/96/html/6.1_Release_Notes/index.html>

I have two CentOS servers running SSH on two different non-standard ports. So far as I can tell, they have identical /etc/ssh/sshd_config files with the exception of the different port (both are 22xx). However, when running nmap on them, one betrays the port that SSH is running on, and the other does not. I have shut down iptables on both machines and the behaviour remains this way. What could be

On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 17:51 -0400, Vincent S. Cojot via samba wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > First of all, thank you for taking the time to help me. > I tried your suggestion and all results came up empty. > > Then I did a few lapdsearch(es) and found this: > > 1) This query returns two users: > ldapsearch -H ldaps://dc00.ad.lasthome.solace.krynn:636 -x -W -D >

Hello Sorry for the (I guess) simple question, but: I have 7 computers under one 8-port router (D-Link DIR-100, firmware v1.13EU) in my network (actually in a sub-network) and they do not see each other's host names. The router has the 'DNS relay' option enabled, and all 7 computers use the router as the DNS server, which in turn will forward DNS requests to the ISP DNS server.

Hi, I am running Cent OS 5.8 in production. Can someone please explain me about various repositories available in CentOS 5.8 and which third party repos ( http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories) i should use it in Production environment. Help me understand the pros and cons. Regards Kaushal

(Sorry, third time -- last one, promise, just giving it a subject line!) OK, a second machine hosted at the same hosting company has also apparently been hacked. Since 2 of out of 3 machines hosted at that company have now been hacked, but this hasn't happened to any of the other 37 dedicated servers that I've got hosted at other hosting companies (also CentOS, same version or almost),