Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "packetdriver".
2002 Jul 10
1
PXE UNDI Options in PXELINUX
Hello
I wonder, if you know any more about the possibilities of having a
standard Network driver for most cards. Is there any such thing for
linux? Where do I get it? Is there possibly something for DOS? A UNDI
Packetdriver would be cool, because then I could use DosSCP on every
Network card I would ever be using with MemDisk (which in turn is very
cool.)
bye
Christian (thinking about writing own PXE/UNDI Packetdriver)
--
HiWi PC-Administration
Rechenzentrum TU-Clausthal
mailto:christian.marg at tu-clausthal.de
2007 Sep 15
2
keeppxe+memdisk+FreeDOS example?
Hi,
I'm trying to get the above working, without success so far: UNDIS.DOS
refuses to load with an invalid NDIS stack message (from memory).
keeppxe has some effect: it reduces the available conventional memory
by 140 kbytes or so... still, the packet driver doesn't seem to find
the interface. Does anybody have a working setup I could look at?
--
Thanks,
Feri.
2003 Jun 03
0
Re: WinME command.com (was Re: Problems with Memdisk 2.04)
...Information NFS with UDP-Transfers, since it is faster
than
TCP, none of my clients are runnig over router, so the UDP-Stuff shouldn't
be a problem
except it's faster.
What would help also is a configuration advise how to setup DHCP with TFTP
to
get a Multicast Stuff working with a simple packetdriver loaded instead of
the
MS-TCP/IP stack.
My current configuration is a mixture of MS-Stack, bundled with a patched
version
from the last dis_pkt9 Package. Plus a huge enviroment-Variables Pointing to
the Serving DHCP-Server, MAC-Address, IP-Adress, Netmask, STD-GW etc.
Frome those ENV-Variables I cr...
2003 Jun 14
0
Re: WinME command.com
...since it is
>faster
>than
>TCP, none of my clients are runnig over router, so the UDP-Stuff shouldn't
>be a problem
>except it's faster.
>
>What would help also is a configuration advise how to setup DHCP with TFTP
>to
>get a Multicast Stuff working with a simple packetdriver loaded instead of
>the
>MS-TCP/IP stack.
>
>My current configuration is a mixture of MS-Stack, bundled with a patched
>version
>from the last dis_pkt9 Package. Plus a huge enviroment-Variables Pointing
>to
>the Serving DHCP-Server, MAC-Address, IP-Adress, Netmask, STD-GW et...