search for: packagedir

While attempting to package up the HEAD version of nut for our department/campus, I've run into a couple of minor issues with the latest HEAD - I'm going to give it another whack at a PW9170+ UPS and want to make sure I have the latest revision. :) First is, whilst building the drivers (SNMP required), I get: gmake[1]: Entering directory `/fsys2/source/nut-2.1/nut-2.1_cvs/drivers'

I'm trying to install an R package that arrived in a package.tar.gz file. I use: R INSTALL -l /home/adele/packagedir package.tar.gz and I get: ERROR: cannot extract package from package.tar.gz The author of the package assures me that the same command works for his version of solaris and R. He has solaris 5.7 and R 1.4.1, while I have solaris 5.8 and R 1.4.1. Does anyone know what's wrong and how to f...

Hi, I am using Centos 4.4,on which I created a kickstart file using kickstart configurator ,then I created a bootable cd using mkisofs command and then booted the system using this cdrom.The cd managed to boot and found the kickstart file in the cd but fail to continue with this error message "CD not found.The centos 4.4 server cd cd could not found in any of your cdrom drives".I also

...- -/* RHEL 5 has a DVD.iso and several CD-sized -discX-ftp.iso alternatives. - * - * The DVD.iso contains: - * /.treeinfo: - * [general] - * family = Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server - * timestamp = 1328200566.61 - * totaldiscs = 1 - * version = 5.8 - * discnum = 1 - * packagedir = Server - * arch = x86_64 - * [...] - * - * /.discinfo: - * 1328205744.315196 - * Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server 5.8 # product name - * x86_64 # arch - * 1 # disk number - * Server/base - * Server/...

v9 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor patches): https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html There is no substantive change. I

This depends on the patch series "[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml." (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html) v8 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html v9: - I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of smaller, incremental patches. There are some other changes vs v8, but

This fixes almost everything. Note that it adds an extra commit which fixes the whole utf8/iconv business. It's probably better to list what isn't fixed: (1) I didn't leave the osinfo code around because I'm still haven't looked too closely at virt-builder-repository. Can't we just fetch this code from the git history when we need it? (2) I didn't change the way

v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else needed is upstream. Rich.

v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any

v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid