search for: package_dependencies_required

The wiki: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Package_Dependencies_Required_to_Build_Samba Debian / Ubuntu These 2 packages are not available for 18.04 but are for 16.04 python-gpgme python3-gpgme Does this mean you can't build on 18.04? I assume so. I assume this is okay: Note, selecting 'perl-modules-5.26' instead of 'perl-modules' -Barry Adkins

...rg] Namens > > > Barry D. Adkins via samba > > > Verzonden: dinsdag 4 december 2018 5:33 > > > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > > > Onderwerp: [Samba] Required to Build Samba > > > > > > The wiki: > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Package_Dependencies_Required > > > _to_Build_Samba > > > > > > Debian / Ubuntu > > > > > > These 2 packages are not available for 18.04 but are for 16.04 > > > python-gpgme python3-gpgme > > > > If you look here : > > > https://packages.ubuntu.com/...

...jk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Barry D. Adkins via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 4 december 2018 5:33 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] Required to Build Samba > > The wiki: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Package_Dependencies_Required > _to_Build_Samba > > Debian / Ubuntu > > These 2 packages are not available for 18.04 but are for 16.04 > python-gpgme python3-gpgme If you look here : https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=default&section=all&arch=any&keywords=gpgme&searchon=sourcenames Y...

...00, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > > > > Between you and me I'm sure we can come up with a clear structure. > > Most likely a table of versions vs distributions with a > link to each. > > I made a start on this here: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Package_Dependencies_Required > _to_Build_Samba#Verified_Package_Dependencies > > It includes a protected page (given the links) here: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Verified_Package_Dependencies > > I hope we will see bootstrap backported so we can fill out 4.10 in > there, as that is causing m...

...gt; > > > > No, it wouldn't have been there, 4.7.4 isn't old enough. > > > > > > When you built Samba, did you have all the correct > packages installed, > > > see here: > > > > > > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Package_Dependencies_Required > _to_Build_ > > Samba#Debian_.2F_Ubuntu > > Yes, I copied the list from the WiKi (when I installed 4.7.4) > but haven't reviewed it since - so if there's been additions > since, that may be an issue. > > > > > > > Is Apparmor installed, or a fi...

On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 20:29 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 21/05/2019 20:15, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 17:44 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > > > There was some talk of this happening automatically, but this > > > seems > > > to > > > have not come to fruition yet. > > > > It has. See the

...ote that I'm giving Samba > the benefit of > >> the doubt since I'm doing this on a SoC rather than a full PC or > >> server. > > > > Which set of dependencies did you follow ? > > On our wiki page: > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Package_Dependencies_Required > _to_Build_Samba > > There are two sets, an older set (that may or may not be > correct) or > > the ones that you should follow, these are under the > heading 'Verified > > Package Dependencies' > > I've been following the whole process outlined at...

...; anywhere else according to find). > > > > Roy > > > > > > No, it wouldn't have been there, 4.7.4 isn't old enough. > > When you built Samba, did you have all the correct packages installed, > see here: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Package_Dependencies_Required_to_Build_Samba#Debian_.2F_Ubuntu > > Is Apparmor installed, or a firewall ? > > Rowland > Another thought, could this be an authentication problem ? try adding '-U Administrator' and see if this helps. Rowland

I'm trying to configure an SoC system as an AD DC on Ubuntu 18.04. I was successful on Ubuntu 16.04 a couple of years ago, and the script I used to configure the system from first boot to provisioned fails on 18.04 and 16.04. The failure is thus: Setting up self join set_nt_acl_no_snum: fset_nt_acl returned NT_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED. ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741637,