search for: pacified

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 36 matches for "pacified".

Did you mean: pacifier
2014 Jan 23
4
[PATCH] Proposal for a pacifier option with mkdiskimage
Hi, i too played with mkdiskimage in order to get more Linux examples. When i applied it to a real 2 GB stick with write speed 4 MB/s i had enough time to add some pacifier code to the big zeroizer loop. (-s does not prevent zeroizing on block device. Probably because truncate() fails.) My pacifier is combined with what Perl advised me when i tried "fsync(OUTPUT);". Of course this
2014 Jan 27
0
[PATCH] Proposal for a pacifier option with mkdiskimage
On 01/23/2014 08:47 AM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > i too played with mkdiskimage in order to get more Linux examples. > > When i applied it to a real 2 GB stick with write speed 4 MB/s > i had enough time to add some pacifier code to the big zeroizer > loop. (-s does not prevent zeroizing on block device. Probably > because truncate() fails.) > Yes, we should
2014 Jan 30
2
[PATCH 04/05] utils/mkdiskimage.in: New option -S to sync zeroizing after each cylinder and to issue pacifier messages
utils/mkdiskimage.in: New option -S to sync zeroizing after each cylinder and to issue pacifier messages. --- utils/mkdiskimage_patched_03.in 2014-01-30 20:54:27.000000000 +0100 +++ utils/mkdiskimage.in 2014-01-30 20:59:19.000000000 +0100 @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ if ( $file eq '' || $c < 1 || $h < 1 || print STDERR " -4 use partition entry 4 (standard for
2014 Jan 23
0
[PATCH] Proposal for a pacifier option with mkdiskimage
> It is based on > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/boot/syslinux/syslinux.git/tree/utils/mkdiskimage.in?id=syslinux-6.03-pre1 Just a thought (FWIW). Perhaps it could be useful to base it on the syslinux4-xx branch: http://git.zytor.com/?p=syslinux/syslinux.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/sysl inux-4.xx;hb=syslinux-4.xx http://git.zytor.com/?p=syslinux/syslinux.git;a=blob_plain;f=utils/mkd
2014 Jan 28
0
[PATCH] Proposal for a pacifier option with mkdiskimage
Am 28.01.2014 08:44, schrieb Thomas Schmitt: > > Yes, we should probably fix that. The tool was originally designed for > images, not for hardware devices, and it doesn't make much sense to zero > the whole hardware device like that. Probably not. But a left over backup GPT at the end of a "disk" (hard disk, thumb drive, SSD, eMMC) now confuses some UEFI
2014 Jan 29
1
[PATCH] Proposal for a pacifier option with mkdiskimage
Hallo, Mattias, Du meintest am 28.01.14: >> Yes, we should probably fix that. The tool was originally designed >> for images, not for hardware devices, and it doesn't make much sense >> to zero the whole hardware device like that. > Probably not. But a left over backup GPT at the end of a "disk" (hard > disk, thumb drive, SSD, eMMC) now confuses some UEFI
2014 Jan 28
3
[PATCH] Proposal for a pacifier option with mkdiskimage
Hi, me: > > [mkdiskimage] -s does not prevent zeroizing on block device. Probably > > because truncate() fails. hpa: > Yes, we should probably fix that. The tool was originally designed for > images, not for hardware devices, and it doesn't make much sense to zero > the whole hardware device like that. Maybe for privacy reasons ? But indeed: -s should skip zeroizing,
2008 Feb 15
2
[LLVMdev] Some blogged LLVM experience.
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 09:06 +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: > Does ruby compile ruby code to native instructions and execute them? No. Ruby is an interpreted language. The latest version has a VM that it targets -- YARV -- but it still does not compile to native like, say, a JIT would. > Otherwise it probably means that llvm-gcc miscompiled something. This is what I'm guessing at
2013 Oct 02
2
Resource map sanity check fails after GRUB "keeps" the gfx mode
Hi Pavel On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Pavel Roskin <proski at gnu.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 16:47:29 +0200 > David Herrmann <dh.herrmann at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for your investigations. I finally sent my patch and put you on >> CC. Sorry for the delay, but I have mostly catched up with all emails >> now. >> >> This really just
2016 May 11
2
access to files continues after removing user from group
...ly update running process > tokens. > > That just not the way running processes work > I'm afraid. Well I'll be! I verified that this is the case for netatalk as well. I am surprised the security minded haven't gone bonkers over this. I wonder what reason(s) keep them pacified? I still don't understand why removing a user from group does not take effect until a new process starts BUT ADDING a user to the group takes effect immediately. Isn't this inconsistent with the "no dynamic updates to running processes" idea? Thanks again, Chad.
2013 Oct 02
2
Resource map sanity check fails after GRUB "keeps" the gfx mode
Hi Pavel On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Pavel Roskin <proski at gnu.org> wrote: > Quoting David Herrmann <dh.herrmann at gmail.com>: > >> I am aware of this and there is already a fix pending from 2 weeks >> ago. Unfortunately, I have been in the US for the last 2 weeks and >> haven't really been able to push on that. Anyhow, it should really be >>
2013 Apr 25
3
problems ensuring that a service is absent
Hi, I''m trying to be really, really sure that a specific service is not running. The central part of this looks like that: service { ''foo'': ensure => stopped, enable => false } -> package { ''foo'': ensure => purged } The astute reader will notice that on the second run puppet will complain that the init script for foo is
2004 Sep 11
0
[LLVMdev] POST MORTEM: llvm-test changes
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 13:53:11 -0700 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 12:49, Jeff Cohen wrote: > > > > ===================== MultiSource/Applications/sgefa > > > sgefa is a known XFAIL. See the nightly test results over the last > several months. Actually, you should compare your test results with the > 1.3 release test results
2016 May 11
0
access to files continues after removing user from group
...ns. > > > > That just not the way running processes work > > I'm afraid. > > Well I'll be! I verified that this is the case for netatalk as well. I am > surprised the security minded haven't gone bonkers over this. I wonder what > reason(s) keep them pacified? Because that's just the way the process model works. > I still don't understand why removing a user from group does not take effect > until a new process starts > BUT ADDING a user to the group takes effect immediately. > > Isn't this inconsistent with the "no d...
2001 Oct 23
3
Did I read correctly?
Is it possible to run MS Word on a LInux box without Windows installed? If so, would someone be willing to help me get it running? I would like to use MS Word ver 7, but want nothing to do with Windoze. Word Perfect 8 for Linux can get testy at times. cedric
2001 Oct 25
1
Getting W95 files
I have W95 on CD, but not installed. Is it possible to get 'dll' files off the CD?
2001 Dec 04
2
Serial problem with Zworld
I just installed SuSE 7.3 linux including the supplied wine distro. I'm trying to run a single board computer from Zworld called the Rabbit. The specific app name is dcrab619.exe. The gui comes up with no problem but when it tries to talk to the serial port I get these messages from wine: err:string:CompareStringA (s1=(null),s2=""...): Invalide NULL string
2011 Mar 28
1
idct/fdct.c function calls
Hi. I am trying to find calls of idct/fdct.c functions by tracing png2theora.c calls. But found only: analyze.c:oc_dct_cost2() Where and when idct/fdct/mmxidct/mmxfdct.c functions are used? Mentions of "dct" word: ==== pacify at optima-amd64:/usr/src/libtheora-1.2.0alpha1/lib$ grep dct *.c | cut -f1 -d":" | uniq -c ???? 19 analyze.c ???? 28 decode.c ???? 22 encode.c ????? 4
2013 Oct 02
0
Resource map sanity check fails after GRUB "keeps" the gfx mode
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 16:47:29 +0200 David Herrmann <dh.herrmann at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your investigations. I finally sent my patch and put you on > CC. Sorry for the delay, but I have mostly catched up with all emails > now. > > This really just suppresses the warning and nothing else. Thank you for your detailed explanation in the patch. > It does not >
2013 Oct 03
0
Resource map sanity check fails after GRUB "keeps" the gfx mode
Hi David, On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 00:19:56 +0200 David Herrmann <dh.herrmann at gmail.com> wrote: > >> And your PCI-BAR adjustment doesn't change > >> anything either, sorry. > > > > I simply tried another approach to pacify the resource checker. > > > > However, there is some difference. nvidiafb cannot access the > > resources if