Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "paci".
Did you mean:
  pace
  
2011 Nov 20
6
A-law and mu-law
...ers are not 
> made to work with it (they can only output plain PCM) Best option would 
> be converting these files to 16-bit plain WAV and compressing, but I 
> guess files won't be much smaller that way. IMO best is to keep them as 
> they are.
> 
> Op 18-11-11 12:34, Giulio Paci schreef:
>> Hi to all!
>> 	I have a database of audio files that I want to losslessly compress.
>> Unfortunately I have several 8bit A-law and mu-law files in the database
>> and I see from here
>> http://flac.sourceforge.net/documentation_tools_flac.html
>> that...
2011 Nov 21
1
A-law and mu-law
Thank you all for your answers. They were all useful.
Il 21/11/2011 07:37, Erik de Castro Lopo ha scritto:
> Giulio Paci wrote:
> 
>> 	thank you for your answer. So the problem would be suboptimal
>> compression due to suboptimal assumption about the input signal, right?
>> What I do not understand is how the format of a FLAC format would be
>> affected by supporting A-law and mu-law files...
2011 Nov 18
2
A-law and mu-law
Hi to all!
	I have a database of audio files that I want to losslessly compress.
Unfortunately I have several 8bit A-law and mu-law files in the database 
and I see from here
http://flac.sourceforge.net/documentation_tools_flac.html
that they are not supported by the reference flac encoder/decoder.
Is there a reason for this?
Would it be possible to add support for these files in the reference 
2011 Nov 18
0
A-law and mu-law
...FLAC format altogether, decoders are not 
made to work with it (they can only output plain PCM) Best option would 
be converting these files to 16-bit plain WAV and compressing, but I 
guess files won't be much smaller that way. IMO best is to keep them as 
they are.
Op 18-11-11 12:34, Giulio Paci schreef:
> Hi to all!
> 	I have a database of audio files that I want to losslessly compress.
> Unfortunately I have several 8bit A-law and mu-law files in the database
> and I see from here
> http://flac.sourceforge.net/documentation_tools_flac.html
> that they are not supported...
2011 Nov 21
0
A-law and mu-law
On Nov 19, 2011, at 16:42, Giulio Paci wrote:
> So the problem would be suboptimal compression due to suboptimal  
> assumption about the input signal, right?
The problem is more that FLAC should not be a collection of code to  
read every possible file format in existence.  That would be a  
duplication of at least two other aud...
2011 Nov 21
1
A-law and mu-law
...cate the code. If anything it'd make more
sense to remove code for reading other formats from the flac sources
and just use libsndfile for that part.
cheers,
Conrad.
On 21 November 2011 21:01, Brian Willoughby <brianw at sounds.wa.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 19, 2011, at 16:42, Giulio Paci wrote:
>> So the problem would be suboptimal compression due to suboptimal
>> assumption about the input signal, right?
>
> The problem is more that FLAC should not be a collection of code to
> read every possible file format in existence. ?That would be a
> duplication of a...
2007 Jul 17
0
Help with Apache on Suse 10
Ciao,
sorry if I will say some things that will not make any sense, but I have
a limited experience with Ruby, Apache and Linux in general, and
therefore ask you all for help.
I''ve configured Apache 2.3 to run on Suse Server Enterprise 10, and it
works fine (can easily get index page).
Then installed Ruby on Rails, and if I start the Test application with
the included web server (sorry