search for: p_smooth

...def __NOUVEAU_DVFS_H__ > +#define __NOUVEAU_DVFS_H__ > + > +#include <core/subdev.h> > +#include <core/device.h> > + > +#include <subdev/timer.h> > + > +struct nouveau_dvfs_data { > + int p_load_target; > + int p_load_max; > + int p_smooth; > + unsigned int avg_load; > +}; > + > +struct nouveau_dvfs { > + struct nouveau_subdev base; > + struct nouveau_alarm alarm; > + struct nouveau_dvfs_data *data; > +}; > + > +static inline struct nouveau_dvfs * > +nouveau_dvfs(void *obj) &gt...

...gt; +#include <core/subdev.h> >>> +#include <core/device.h> >>> + >>> +#include <subdev/timer.h> >>> + >>> +struct nouveau_dvfs_data { >>> + int p_load_target; >>> + int p_load_max; >>> + int p_smooth; >>> + unsigned int avg_load; >>> +}; >>> + >>> +struct nouveau_dvfs { >>> + struct nouveau_subdev base; >>> + struct nouveau_alarm alarm; >>> + struct nouveau_dvfs_data *data; >>> +}; >>> + &gt...

Hi, This is a try to have some simple DVFS (Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling) support for GK20A. Instead of relying on other existing frequency scaling framework, we create a simple subdev in Nouveau for the same purpose. That's because we don't want to make the DVFS implementation for GK20A far more than enough in the beginning and hinder the implementation for dGPU in the future.

...de4 --- /dev/null +++ b/nvkm/include/subdev/dvfs.h @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +#ifndef __NOUVEAU_DVFS_H__ +#define __NOUVEAU_DVFS_H__ + +#include <core/subdev.h> +#include <core/device.h> + +#include <subdev/timer.h> + +struct nouveau_dvfs_data { + int p_load_target; + int p_load_max; + int p_smooth; + unsigned int avg_load; +}; + +struct nouveau_dvfs { + struct nouveau_subdev base; + struct nouveau_alarm alarm; + struct nouveau_dvfs_data *data; +}; + +static inline struct nouveau_dvfs * +nouveau_dvfs(void *obj) +{ + return (void *)nv_device(obj)->subdev[NVDEV_SUBDEV_DVFS]; +} + +extern str...

...OUVEAU_DVFS_H__ >> + >> +#include <core/subdev.h> >> +#include <core/device.h> >> + >> +#include <subdev/timer.h> >> + >> +struct nouveau_dvfs_data { >> + int p_load_target; >> + int p_load_max; >> + int p_smooth; >> + unsigned int avg_load; >> +}; >> + >> +struct nouveau_dvfs { >> + struct nouveau_subdev base; >> + struct nouveau_alarm alarm; >> + struct nouveau_dvfs_data *data; >> +}; >> + >> +static inline struct nouveau_...

Two trivial PMU-related fixes for Tegra: - Add a dummy func member to GK20A, since nvkm_pmmu_pgob() unconditionally dereferences it - Check whether a PMU actually exists before calling nvkm_pmmu_pgob(). During early bringup we are likely to not have a PMU Alexandre Courbot (2): pmu/gk20a: add dummy func gr/gf100: do not assume a PMU is present drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c | 3 ++-

...gt; >>>> +#include <core/device.h> >>>> + >>>> +#include <subdev/timer.h> >>>> + >>>> +struct nouveau_dvfs_data { >>>> + int p_load_target; >>>> + int p_load_max; >>>> + int p_smooth; >>>> + unsigned int avg_load; >>>> +}; >>>> + >>>> +struct nouveau_dvfs { >>>> + struct nouveau_subdev base; >>>> + struct nouveau_alarm alarm; >>>> + struct nouveau_dvfs_data *data; >&gt...

There might be some callers of nouveau_clock_astate(), and they are from inetrrupt context. So we must ensure that this function can be atomic in that condition. This patch adds one parameter which is subsequently passed to nouveau_pstate_calc(). Therefore we can choose whether we want to wait for the pstate work's completion or not. Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> ---

nvkm_mm_fini() was not called when exiting the driver, resulting in a memory leak. Fix this. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> --- drm/nouveau/nouveau_platform.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_platform.c b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_platform.c index 3691982452a9..f83aa12ee5c6 100644 --- a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_platform.c +++

...e.obj); + nvkm_vm_ref(NULL, &priv->pmuvm.vm, priv->pmuvm.pgd); + nvkm_gpuobj_ref(NULL, &priv->pmuvm.pgd); + nvkm_gpuobj_ref(NULL, &priv->pmuvm.mem); +} + static struct gk20a_pmu_dvfs_data -gk20a_dvfs_data= { +gk20a_dvfs_data = { .p_load_target = 70, .p_load_max = 90, .p_smooth = 1, @@ -205,6 +930,9 @@ gk20a_pmu_ctor(struct nvkm_object *parent, struct nvkm_object *engine, struct nvkm_object **pobject) { struct gk20a_pmu_priv *priv; + struct nvkm_pmu *pmu; + struct nvkm_mc *pmc; + const struct firmware *pmufw = NULL; int ret; ret = nvkm_pmu_create(parent,...

...->pmuvm.pgd); >> + nvkm_gpuobj_ref(NULL, &priv->pmuvm.mem); >> +} >> + >> static struct gk20a_pmu_dvfs_data >> -gk20a_dvfs_data= { >> +gk20a_dvfs_data = { >> .p_load_target = 70, >> .p_load_max = 90, >> .p_smooth = 1, >> @@ -205,6 +930,9 @@ gk20a_pmu_ctor(struct nvkm_object *parent, struct >> nvkm_object *engine, >> struct nvkm_object **pobject) >> { >> struct gk20a_pmu_priv *priv; >> + struct nvkm_pmu *pmu; >> + struct nvkm_mc *...

..._hw1(struct nvkm_pmu *ppmu, struct nvkm_mc *pmc); > +static void gk20a_pmu_intr(struct nvkm_subdev *subdev); > > +static void gk20a_pmu_pgob(struct nvkm_pmu *ppmu, bool enable); > struct gk20a_pmu_dvfs_data { > int p_load_target; > int p_load_max; > int p_smooth; > unsigned int avg_load; > }; > - > struct gk20a_pmu_priv { > struct nvkm_pmu base; > struct nvkm_alarm alarm; > @@ -46,7 +92,30 @@ struct gk20a_pmu_dvfs_dev_status { > unsigned long busy; > int cur_state; > }; > - > +i...

...t nvkm_pmu *ppmu); +static int gk20a_init_pmu_setup_hw1(struct nvkm_pmu *ppmu, struct nvkm_mc *pmc); +static void gk20a_pmu_intr(struct nvkm_subdev *subdev); +static void gk20a_pmu_pgob(struct nvkm_pmu *ppmu, bool enable); struct gk20a_pmu_dvfs_data { int p_load_target; int p_load_max; int p_smooth; unsigned int avg_load; }; - struct gk20a_pmu_priv { struct nvkm_pmu base; struct nvkm_alarm alarm; @@ -46,7 +92,30 @@ struct gk20a_pmu_dvfs_dev_status { unsigned long busy; int cur_state; }; - +int gk20a_pmu_debugfs_init(struct nvkm_pmu *ppmu) +{ + struct dentry *d; + ppmu->debugfs...

This was the first step of the secure boot refactoring - as Ben asked for some fixes, I now submit it as its own series to make it easier to review (and also because rebasing secure boot on top of this takes time and I don't want to do it until this is validated!). This series attempts to factorize the duplicate falcon-related code into a single library, using the existing nvkm_falcon

..._hw1(struct nvkm_pmu *ppmu, struct nvkm_mc *pmc); > +static void gk20a_pmu_intr(struct nvkm_subdev *subdev); > > +static void gk20a_pmu_pgob(struct nvkm_pmu *ppmu, bool enable); > struct gk20a_pmu_dvfs_data { > int p_load_target; > int p_load_max; > int p_smooth; > unsigned int avg_load; > }; > - > struct gk20a_pmu_priv { > struct nvkm_pmu base; > struct nvkm_alarm alarm; > @@ -46,7 +92,30 @@ struct gk20a_pmu_dvfs_dev_status { > unsigned long busy; > int cur_state; > }; > - > +i...