search for: p33219245

...a function? > > Thanks, > > Chris > > http://old.nabble.com/file/p33219240/radix_mod.c radix_mod.c > http://old.nabble.com/file/p33219240/radix.bc radix.bc > http://old.nabble.com/file/p33219240/radix_mod.bc radix_mod.bc > > > http://old.nabble.com/file/p33219245/radix_sun.s radix_sun.s -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-Sparc--size-of-input-arguments-with-doubles-in-llvm-byte-code--tp33219240p33219245.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi, I have a llvm asssembly version of radix_mod.c modified from radix (a splash2 bench mark). It is named radix.bc. I have extended the number of arguments from 2 to 4 in the function called product_mod_46 and saved it as a new file called radix_mod.bc . Although the extra arguments does not do anything in the function. It still broke the code on sparc. However, both versions of the byte code