Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "p0098r1".
Did you mean:
p0033r1
2016 Feb 18
2
Proposal for new memory_order_consume definition
Hello!
A proposal (quaintly identified as P0190R0) for a new memory_order_consume
definition may be found here:
http://www2.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/submission/consume.2016.02.10b.pdf
As requested at the October C++ Standards Committee meeting, this
is a follow-on to P0098R1 that picks one alternative and describes
it in detail. This approach focuses on existing practice, with the
goal of supporting existing code with existing compilers. In the last
clang/LLVM patch I saw for basic support of this change, you could count
the changed lines and still have lots of finge...
2016 Feb 20
3
[isocpp-parallel] Proposal for new memory_order_consume definition
...;
> A proposal (quaintly identified as P0190R0) for a new memory_order_consume
> definition may be found here:
>
> http://www2.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/submission/consume.2016.02.10b.pdf
>
> As requested at the October C++ Standards Committee meeting, this
> is a follow-on to P0098R1 that picks one alternative and describes
> it in detail. This approach focuses on existing practice, with the
> goal of supporting existing code with existing compilers. In the last
> clang/LLVM patch I saw for basic support of this change, you could count
> the changed lines and still...
2016 Feb 26
0
[isocpp-parallel] Proposal for new memory_order_consume definition
...tified as P0190R0) for a new
> memory_order_consume
> > definition may be found here:
> >
> > http://www2.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/submission/consume.2016.02.10b.pdf
> >
> > As requested at the October C++ Standards Committee meeting, this
> > is a follow-on to P0098R1 that picks one alternative and describes
> > it in detail. This approach focuses on existing practice, with the
> > goal of supporting existing code with existing compilers. In the last
> > clang/LLVM patch I saw for basic support of this change, you could count
> > the chan...
2016 Feb 27
4
[isocpp-parallel] Proposal for new memory_order_consume definition
...gt; memory_order_consume
> > > definition may be found here:
> > >
> > > http://www2.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/submission/consume.2016.02.10b.pdf
> > >
> > > As requested at the October C++ Standards Committee meeting, this
> > > is a follow-on to P0098R1 that picks one alternative and describes
> > > it in detail. This approach focuses on existing practice, with the
> > > goal of supporting existing code with existing compilers. In the last
> > > clang/LLVM patch I saw for basic support of this change, you could count
>...