search for: p002f202

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "p002f202".

2004 Sep 23
0
Cisco 30 VIP
...any of you already doing it with skinny, it should be working also in my case. I read and used all the hints and samples I was able to find on the list and elsewhere. Source is new, from yesterday. This is in my skinny.conf (apart from all the default stuff) [30vip] device=SEP00B06409B25D version=P002F202 context=default line => 100 I tried also other parameters, to no avail. Display shows F2.02 Phone settings: IP 192.168.1.3 Mask 255.255.255.0 Gateway 192.168.1.9 (* box) DNS 0.0.0.0 (disabled) TFTP 192.168.1.9 (* box) Any suggestions? 4
2004 Mar 31
0
Can't talk on Cisco VIP 30 using Chan Skinny
...ch context=demo line => 120 ; Dial(Skinny/120@florian) ; Typical config for 12SP+ [florianx] device=SEPXXXXXXXXXXXX version=P0020301003 ; Thanks critch context=default line => 122 ; Dial(Skinny/120@florian) ; Typical config for 12SP+ [flex] device=SEPXXXXXXXXXXXX version=P002F202 context=demo line => 133
2004 Mar 31
2
RE: RxFax/spandsp: not disconnecting
...> > ; Typical config for 12SP+ > [florianx] > device=SEPXXXXXXXXXXXX > version=P0020301003 ; Thanks critch > context=default > line => 122 ; Dial(Skinny/120@florian) > > ; Typical config for 12SP+ > [flex] > device=SEPXXXXXXXXXXXX > version=P002F202 > context=demo > line => 133 > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 8 > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:08:53 +0200 > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > From: Stig Andersson <stig@ymex.se> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Caller entered digits ignored during >...
2004 Jun 10
0
hide caller id
...> > ; Typical config for 12SP+ > [florianx] > device=SEPXXXXXXXXXXXX > version=P0020301003 ; Thanks critch > context=default > line => 122 ; Dial(Skinny/120@florian) > > ; Typical config for 12SP+ > [flex] > device=SEPXXXXXXXXXXXX > version=P002F202 > context=demo > line => 133 > > > > -- __--__-- > > Message: 8 > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:08:53 +0200 > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > From: Stig Andersson <stig@ymex.se> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Caller entered digits ignored during >...