search for: oyvind

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe at zylin.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: >> On 30/06/11 15:13, Øyvind Harboe wrote: >>>> Sorry, I meant from which version of clang? I'm using Ubuntu 10 and >>>> I was wondering if clang/ll...

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > On 30/06/11 15:13, Øyvind Harboe wrote: >>> Sorry, I meant from which version of clang? I'm using Ubuntu 10 and >>> I was wondering if clang/llvm 2.8 would do it. >> >> Perhaps I better try the latest, got an error when I tried 2.8: > > C++ support in clang 2.8 was poor.

...known-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/backward /usr/local/include /usr/local/gcc-4.1/include /usr/local/gcc-4.1/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include /usr/include /usr/local/bin/../lib/clang/3.0/include /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu End of search list. clang -o /home/oyvind/oharboe/build/git/testautomation/linux-amd64-gcc_4_1-debug/testsuite/test.os -c -fPIC -g -W -Wall -m64 -fPIC -DQT_NO_CAST_TO_ASCII -DDEBUG -DLINUX -DLITTLEENDIAN -DQT -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -DQT3_SUPPORT -DQT_DEBUG -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB -I. -I/home/oyvind/oharboe/packages/linux-amd64-gcc_4_1/qt-4_7_1_pat...

Hi, A quick bench-mark of an R matrix muliplication 500by500 X 500by10000, all random variates, with matlab reveals a huge difference in speed (5 times at least). Is there anything that can be done in R to speed up the multiplication? Kind regards, Oyvind -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/matrix-multiplication-speed-R-tp3217257p3217257.html Sent from the R devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi, I get an error using RcppGSL: fatal error: gsl/gsl_vector.h:No such file or directory. What is the best way to install these files as they seem to be missing? Thanks, Oyvind -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Error-using-RcppGSL-tp3613535p3613535.html Sent from the R devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

...Platform: x86 (IA32) URL: http://it.slashdot.org/it/08/08/20/0029220.shtml OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: lowest Component: plugin AssignedTo: swfdec at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: oyvinds at everdot.org QAContact: swfdec at lists.freedesktop.org The Adove Flash URL clipboard-hijacking insertion of hostile URLs "feature" (demo at http://raffon.net/research/flash/cb/test.html) does not work with swfdec-mozilla. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org...

Anyone know how to esimate parameters in the system: x[k]=Ax[k-1]+ B + Gv[k-1] y[k]=x[k]+Du[k]+Hw[k] a system with exogenous u[k] in the measurement eq., v,w are iid, both eq. are gaussian. Thanks, Oyvind --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I have been trying to figure out how glusterfs-fuse client will handle it when 1 of 3 bricks in a 3-way replica is slower than the others. It looks like a glusterfs-fuse client will send requests to all 3 bricks when accessing a file. But what happens when one of the bricks is not responding in time? We saw an issue when we added external load to the raid volume where the brick was located. The

On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe at zylin.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Reid Kleckner <reid.kleckner at gmail.com> wrote: >> An easier way would be to use a coverage tool like gcov to see what's >> actually *used* when the app is run normally.  Then you can ask the >> quest...

...la = Y ~ X1 + X2, data = dump) Standardized weighted residuals 2: Error in quantile.default(x$residuals) : missing values and NaN's not allowed if 'na.rm' is FALSE In addition: Warning message: In sqrt(v * (1 - hatvalues(object))) : NaNs produced Does anybody know how to fix this? Oyvind -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Error-using-betareg-tp3621955p3621955.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Reid Kleckner <reid.kleckner at gmail.com> wrote: > An easier way would be to use a coverage tool like gcov to see what's > actually *used* when the app is run normally.  Then you can ask the > question, what percentage of all lines of code are dead? We need something that can do this using static analysis... Otherwise we can just use Eclipse

Whoops! Forgot to CC: the list! ----- Forwarded Message ----- > From:Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > To:Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe at zylin.com> > Cc: > Sent:Thursday, November 18, 2010 7:22:39 PM > Subject:Re: [LLVMdev] Writing a backend for the ZPU > > > Hello, Some > thoughts/problems: - In GCC I created > registers which were just stack > slots in the stack frame. This > all...

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Øyvind, > >> I'm trying to find some written evidence to present to the powers >> that be that clang/llvm is ABI compatible with GCC 4.1 linux >> 64 bit. > > both clang and gcc-4.1 are supposed to conform to the platform ABI (if they > don't then that is a bug), and thus

...tool like gcov to see what's actually *used* when the app is run normally. Then you can ask the question, what percentage of all lines of code are dead? A static analysis will not be able to see through things like virtual method calls. Reid On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe at zylin.com> wrote: > Can llvm generate warnings for unused C++ code using global > analysis? > > If I could use llvm to figure out what code I can delete in a 20 > year old app with millions of lines of code, this alone would defend > spending time on making the app bu...

Hi Øyvind, > I'm trying to find some written evidence to present to the powers > that be that clang/llvm is ABI compatible with GCC 4.1 linux > 64 bit. both clang and gcc-4.1 are supposed to conform to the platform ABI (if they don't then that is a bug), and thus be ABI compatible. Ciao, Duncan.

Can llvm generate warnings for unused C++ code using global analysis? If I could use llvm to figure out what code I can delete in a 20 year old app with millions of lines of code, this alone would defend spending time on making the app build with llvm, even if we don't actually run the code generated... -- Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin Consulting help on your project? US toll free

...CodeViz that can generate (imperfect) call graphs for you. It sounds like you just need a rough list of functions that might be unused to start with. -Scott On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe at zylin.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Reid Kleckner <reid.kleckner at gmail.com> wrote: >>> An easier way would be to use a coverage tool like gcov to see what's >>> actually *used* when the app is run normally.  Then you can ask the &g...

...le/events/21 http://fosdem.org/2007/schedule/events/27 http://fosdem.org/2007/schedule/events/23 Examples for abstract/bio/links of speakers: http://fosdem.org/2007/schedule/speakers/jim+gettys http://fosdem.org/2007/schedule/speakers/federico+mena+quintero http://fosdem.org/2007/schedule/speakers/oyvind+kolas Thanks for your cooperation ;) cheers - -- -o) Pascal Bleser <loki at fosdem.org> http://www.fosdem.org /\\ FOSDEM 2007 :: 24 + 25 February 2007 in Brussels _\_v Free and Opensource Software Developers European Meeting -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (...

Hi, I'm trying to have another stab at writing an LLVM ZPU backend. Any pointers or encouragement would be greatly appreciated. So far I've been wandering around the LLVM trying to read up and I've hacked together something that builds just to experiment and get a feel for the build system. I was able to write a backend for GCC which has been in use for years now, but I can't

Hi, I'm trying to find some written evidence to present to the powers that be that clang/llvm is ABI compatible with GCC 4.1 linux 64 bit. This would allow me to work with clang/llvm at my day-job and I would like nothing better! This is a pretty big app(millions of lines of code), so it would be interesting to see how llvm/clang behaves. Better warnings/errors and cutting down on build