search for: ovgu

On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:38:14 +0200 Bernd Markgraf <bernd.markgraf at med.ovgu.de> wrote: > On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 14:20 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 15:01:12 +0200 > > Bernd Markgraf <bernd.markgraf at med.ovgu.de> wrote: > > > I would like to see that behaviour on my machine too ;-) > > > > Then...

Hi, I have two non-normal distributions and use interquartile ranges as a dispersion measure. Now I am looking for a test, which tests whether the interquartile ranges from the two distributions are significantly different. Any idea? Thanks, joerg [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 15:01:12 +0200 Bernd Markgraf <bernd.markgraf at med.ovgu.de> wrote: > > > > On the OS level everything works flawlessly (without using > > > winbind). > > > Login upon first try, kerberos ticket properly issued, uid/gid set > > > to the numbers provided from the LDAP (Samba DC) backend.  > > Well, yes it...

On Mon, 02 Jul 2018 12:04:10 +0200 Bernd Markgraf <bernd.markgraf at med.ovgu.de> wrote: > Do you agree that this is a valid smb.conf that should work: > [global] >        security = ADS >        encrypt passwords = yes >        workgroup = MD-DZNE >        realm = MAGDEBURG.DZNE.DS > >        log file = /opt/samba4/var/log/%m.log >        log...

On Mon, 02 Jul 2018 12:38:54 +0200 Bernd Markgraf <bernd.markgraf at med.ovgu.de> wrote: > On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 11:30 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > Provided that your users have a uidNumber attribute containing a > > unique number inside the '10000-999999' range AND Domain Users has a > > gidNumber attribute containing a nu...

On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 13:07:56 +0200 Bernd Markgraf <bernd.markgraf at med.ovgu.de> wrote: > On Tue, 2018-06-19 at 11:04 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba-technical > wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 11:12:11 +0200 > > Bernd Markgraf via samba-technical <samba-technical at lists.samba.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > &g...

Hello, LLVMers! How can I force a front end to generate VAARG for accessing varargs parameters? I compile a simple C-code: #include <stdarg.h> int FnVarArgs(int a, ...) { int i,tmp=0; va_list ptArgument; va_start(ptArgument,a); for(i=0;i<9;i++) tmp+= va_arg(ptArgument,int); return tmp; } And then have this bytecode: ; ModuleID = 'main.bc' target

On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 14:20 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 15:01:12 +0200 > Bernd Markgraf <bernd.markgraf at med.ovgu.de> wrote: > > I would like to see that behaviour on my machine too ;-) > > Then just do what I do, use only winbind. That's what I have now. pre-winbind (ldap in nsswitch.conf) root.niihau ~ # wbinfo --uid-info=10058 failed to call wbcGetpwuid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND Could n...

On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 21:08:46 +0200 Bernd Markgraf <bernd.markgraf at med.ovgu.de> wrote: > On Tue, 2018-06-19 at 12:44 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > > Why are you using LDAP for authentication on a Unix domain > > > > member ? > > > > > > Because it just works and is straightforward to set up and things > &gt...

Do you agree that this is a valid smb.conf that should work: [global]        security = ADS        encrypt passwords = yes        workgroup = MD-DZNE        realm = MAGDEBURG.DZNE.DS        log file = /opt/samba4/var/log/%m.log        log level = 1         idmap config *:backend = tdb        idmap config *:range = 3000-7999        idmap config MD-DZNE:backend = ad        idmap config

On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 11:30 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > Provided that your users have a uidNumber attribute containing a > unique number inside the '10000-999999' range AND Domain Users has a > gidNumber attribute containing a number inside the same range, then, > yes it is a valid smb.conf. These attributes are not added > automatically, you must add them

Hi, while looking into adding instant commands to turn on/off the load, reboot, shutdown etc I came across some questions: - XUPS.mib isn't really clear whether turning off the load affects only this single UPS one sends the command to or if it affects all UPS in this system (in my case 2 UPS). Does anyone happen to know how issuing a "load.off" would behave? - XUPS.mib

On Tue, 2018-06-19 at 12:44 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > Why are you using LDAP for authentication on a Unix domain member > > > ? > > > > Because it just works and is straightforward to set up and things > > like ldaplist&co work. Until I resolved the open issue I'll just > > leave things as they are. > Yes, but its not working,

Hi, I got a shiny pair of new PowerWare 9155 UPS (3 input phaes, one output phase), running parallel. Since I didn't want to install a Windows box to run Powerwares software I now went nut(s) ;-) So far things look pretty good, snmp-ups talks to both ups using the pw mib. Though I get these messages, when I start the driver: [ups2] nut_snmp_get: 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.4.4.1.3: Error in packet:

Hi, I got a shiny pair of new PowerWare 9155 UPS (3 input phaes, one output phase), running parallel. Since I didn't want to install a Windows box to run Powerwares software I now went nut(s) ;-) So far things look pretty good, snmp-ups talks to both ups using the pw mib. Though I get these messages, when I start the driver: [ups2] nut_snmp_get: 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.4.4.1.3: Error in packet:

On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 15:42 -0800, John Thurston wrote: > On 7/1/2013 2:55 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: > > On Jul 1, 2013, at 12:47 PM, John Thurston wrote: > > > >> I'm running Solaris 10 on a dozen SPARC boxes. I'd like to explore NUT for use with our snmp UPS, but I'm unable to complete the configure/make/install process. > >> > >> Can anyone

> > On the OS level everything works flawlessly (without using > > winbind). > > Login upon first try, kerberos ticket properly issued, uid/gid set > > to the numbers provided from the LDAP (Samba DC) backend.  > Well, yes it would work to allow login to the computer, it is > bypassing Samba and going direct to the info stored in AD. That part works just as intended.

Hi, I''m running snv84 on a SunFire x2200M2, 2 dualcore opterons, 8GB ram, 2 mirror sata disks (zfs). I tried to install both Ubuntu 7.1 Desktop and Fedora 8 into a HVM domU but failed everytime. The VNC-Server for the domU dies, but the domain still consumes CPU time, disks go idle after a while (zpool iostat or iostat show zero I/O). The domUs booted up fine, the installer started,