search for: overwites

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1957 Bug #: 1957 Summary: New -K option overwites output file Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh-keygen AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at...

Hi, I'm using precompiled (for SCO OS5) 2.0.3. When my Win95 clients save a file to a share that already has a file of the same name samba upcases it. To be completely accurate the files in question have numbers as thier first 8 chars then an extension of .mtr. So, 19991115.mtr on Win95, when copied, becomes 19991115.MTR on the share if it's overwiting a file called 19991115.mtr that

Hi, Using Samba 3.0.1 on SuSE Linux (follow symlinks on) we noticed the following behaviour: A symbolic link to a file gets overwritten (replaced) by the target-file contents if the symbolic link is saved from a windows client. This is not what we expected, because a link represents the file, and so all actions executed on the link should actually be executed on the target-file, not the link. I

While in the upstream kernel I''m unable to find any use of XENPF_settime (and the DOM0_SETTIME alias of it) at all, in the 2.6.18 tree (and the forward ports of it) the function gets used only when ntp_synced() returns true (and - that''s minor - when independent_wallclock is not set). It would however seem to me that this doesn''t cover the case where the host clock gets

Hi, I need to join a Samba 4 DC to a Windows 2008 R2 Active Directory Domain. Do I need provisioned with --use-rfc2307 ? For example: samba-tool domain join samdom.example.com DC -U"SAMDOM\administrator" --use-rfc2307 I intend use SAMBA_INTERNAL DNS. Do I need provision with --intercative for select SAMBA_INTERNAL DNS ? Can I to inform other DNS existing (primary DNS) in my local

if you have N processes reading the same file sequentially (where file size is much greater than physical memory) from the same starting position, should I expect that all N processes finish in the same time as if it were a single process? In other words, if you have one process that reads blocks from a file, is it "free" (meaning no additional total I/O cost) to have another process

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035 Priority: P5 Bug ID: 2035 Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org Summary: Bugs intended to be fixed in 6.2 Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: dtucker at zip.com.au Hardware: All Status: NEW Version: