search for: overthought

Hi, I think you overthought this one a little bit, I don't know if this is the kind of code you are expecting but I came up with something like that: generate_transition_matrix <- function(data, n_states) { #To be sure I imagine you should check n_states is right at this point transitions <- matrix(0, n_...

Hello, I am trying to implement a formula aij= transition from state S_i to S_j/no of transition at state S_i Code I have written is working with three state {1,2,3 }, but if the number of states become={1,2,3,4,......n} then the code will not work, so can some help me with this. For and some rows of my data frame look like

...some error but I will see if I can remove and use >> it. >> >> Regards >> Niharika >> >> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Elie Canonici Merle < >> elie.canonicimerle at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think you overthought this one a little bit, I don't know if this is >>> the kind of code you are expecting but I came up with something like that: >>> >>> generate_transition_matrix <- function(data, n_states) { >>> >>> #To be sure I imagine you should check n_st...

...>>>> Regards >>>> Niharika >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Elie Canonici Merle < >>>> elie.canonicimerle at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I think you overthought this one a little bit, I don't know if this is >>>>> the kind of code you are expecting but I came up with something like that: >>>>> >>>>> generate_transition_matrix <- function(data, n_states) { >>>>> >>>>> #To...

Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:20:41 -0800 > Linda W <samba at tlinx.org> wrote: > >>> >>> >>>> I have been waiting for the 4.x server to become a full server >>>> before upgrading from 3.6.22, but it is getting a bit long in the >>>> tooth. The requirement that in upgrading to 4.x

...ill do, but as you might glimmer from the above, I have > a rather customized solution for my *tiny* domain -- I wanted > it to be a resource for me, as well as providing normal domain > "stuff" (isn't that a technical term?)... Too customized if you ask me, I think you have overthought it ;-) Rowland