search for: overstress

Hello, I need to get how much memory is used by a guest system, in order to implement some monitoring function which tells me if the system is overstressed. I am currently using java apis and the binding which was suggested to me was Domain.memoryStats(); This is a binding to int virDomainMemoryStats (virDomainPtr<http://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt.html#virDomainPtr>dom, virDomainMemoryStatPtr<http://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt...

...ing budget is 20$-40$ (naturally it would increase with consumer demands). We need a fast, reliable host at that cost range. The application has to be fast, especially the AJAX parts. Also there''s a lot of database-querying involved, so the database has to be fast and responsive. I cannot overstress this: if the request/response delay is too long, I won''t be able to do the project in Rails. And if I go with an unreliable host, the whole project might be marked up as a failure and go down the drain. Could you suggest a suitable hosting solution? Regards, Alder Green

...S in python), what operation do I need to do to make this happen? 2014-03-12 13:36 GMT+01:00 Pasquale Dir <phate867@gmail.com>: > Hello, > I need to get how much memory is used by a guest system, in order to > implement some monitoring function which tells me if the system is > overstressed. > > I am currently using java apis and the binding which was suggested to me > was > Domain.memoryStats(); > > This is a binding to int virDomainMemoryStats (virDomainPtr<http://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt.html#virDomainPtr>dom, > virDomainMemoryStatPtr<http:/...

...hen of AT&T ftp://research.att.com/dist/internet_security/117.ps.Z *3.* Network (In)Security Through IP Packet Filtering -- D. Brent Chapman ftp://coast.cs.purdue.edu/pub/doc/firewalls/Brent_Chapman_packet_filtering.ps.Z [mod: I just scanned this article, and it has some good advise. It also overstresses that some features "would be nice". Those are standard on Linux. Also section 2.4.4 (fragments) is "outdated". On Linux you say "always defrag" and the problems raised are solved. If you don't the problems are even worse than he mentions. -- REW] On the subject...

...of `myPar()` in order for this to work as expected - which you might or might not feel is (too) cumbersome. While it probably makes a lot of sense to pass things along explicitly in 95 % of cases, there might be situations where you'd prefer to being able to use `...`. But I don't want to overstress the (current) purpose/use case behind my request. I just wondered if the limitation of not being able to mix `...` with other formal arguments could be lifted soon as the possiblity is already stated at `?dotsMethods` :-) On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Gabriel Becker <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu&...

Perhaps someone can shed some light on the problem I'm having using rsync 2.4.6. I'm getting the following error: receiving file list ... done htdocs/acescounseling/logs/ htdocs/adihome/logs/ . . htdocs/coupons/logs/error_log htdocs/court/logs/combined_log htdocs/cowgirl/logs/combined_log htdocs/cowgirl/logs/error_log htdocs/cowgirl/logs/ssl_log Connection to nova closed by remote host.

Hi Gabriel, and thanks for answering. I'm basically just trying to find a way to use the power of `...` in more complex scenarios and I'm well aware that this might not be the best approach ;-) Regarding your actual question: "Are you suggesting methods be dispatched based on the *contents* of ... [...]?" Yes, I guess currently I kind of do - but not on the argument *names*

...t as semaphore sets. Samba attempts translation to support these types of applications, and the translation has proved to be quite successful. Strictly a SMB server should check for locks before every read and write call on a file. Unfortunately with the way fcntl() works this can be slow and may overstress the rpc.lockd. It is also almost always unnecessary as clients are supposed to independently make locking calls before reads and writes anyway if locking is important to them. By default Samba only makes locking calls when explicitly asked to by a client, but if you set "strict locking = yes&...