search for: oversteps

Hi, this happens since a few days on a Gentoo hardened system using a grsecurity enabled kernel running Dovecot 1.0.10, only to 2 of 10 users though: --8<-- kernel: grsec: From 192.168.0.1: denied resource overstep by \ requesting 537325568 for RLIMIT_AS against limit 536870912 \ for /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap[imap:15708] uid/euid:30010/30010 \ gid/egid:30006/30006, parent

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The running of wine programs is not controlled by the mimetype but by a feature of the linux kernel. In /etc/init.d you might find a init script called wine. This script uses the kernel modules binfmt_misc to tell the linux kernel that when it encounters a file being executed with a special byte in the header to call it with wine. You can disable

Hi This is jesse. I am running exim as my mail server on cygwin. But i need imap/pop3 for accessing mail. I found that dovecot works on cygwin with some code change. So can i know how to compile dovecot on cygwin. This is important ANYBODY ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo!

Howdy folks ! I just added Dovecot as a standard package to Devil-Linux and ran into a problem with resource limits. Grsecurity (http://www.grsecurity.net) is used in DL to prevent problems with common exploits, it also reports violations of rlimits. The following messages show up in the log, but it seems that the IMAP Server works fine: Apr 26 19:20:04 src at gate imap-login: Login: hz

Hi, I am a new user of R and this is my first e-mail here. Please enlighten me on any etiquette issues I may have overstepped on. My questions is as follows: I need to do some data analysis for data from .csv files for stocks (that I have obtained from yahoo) How can I do a "smart update" of this data from Yahoo (or any other site if you wish), so that in some way, I do not have to

I am trying to run Dovecot on RH 7.3 with Linux kernel 2.4.20 + GrSecurity patch. I downloaded the RPM yesterday and installed it. When I start Dovecot the kernel reports: kernel: grsec: From 192.168.1.22: attempt to overstep process limit by (dovecot:14491) UID(0) EUID(0), parent (dovecot:23872) UID(0) EUID(0) I have never seen this problem in the 3 years I have used GrSecurity together with a

Hi! I'm running 1.1rc4 on a system and this happens occasionally: --8<-- mail.info; dovecot: auth(default): client in: AUTH 1 PLAIN service=imap lip=NN.NN.NN.NN rip=NNN.NN.NNN.NN lport=143 mail.info; dovecot: auth-worker(default): pam(XXXXXXXXXXXX,NNN.NN.NNN.NN): lookup service=imap kern.alert; kernel: grsec: From NN.NN.NN.NN: denied resource overstep by requesting

...s. The header of CaptureTracking.cpp says in part: A pointer value is captured if the function makes a copy of any part of the pointer that outlives the call. Clearly, stacks can be smashed without a "capture" occurring; a smash simply uses a pointer in a normal-looking way, but just oversteps the bounds of the pointed-to data. r363169 was intended to fix PR42238, so undoing the patch will have to come up with some other fix for PR42238. Also, there's PR40436, which identified an infinite recursion in HasAddressTaken; there's D57149 to fix that, which was abandoned as irrelevan...

...will not fit, using standard ANOVA. Matrix size can be determined by listing all the terms of the full model and multiplying the levels of each factor withing a term and summing all terms. I said simplified in the first paragraph above, because if I include the day of drug challenge, the model oversteps the number of within-subject factors allowed. So, surprisingly to me, Stata/SE, which I bought for large data sets, is too small! Not that I don't like Stata, but I am annoyed that I must find another tool to use. I understand that SAS Proc Mixed will compute the problem, because it may han...

I''m experiencing an issue where my get/submit calls to the Mechanize agent are leading to timeout exceptions when the ruby script has too many open file descriptors ( > 1000). However, I''m not seeing anything about an overstep violation sent anywhere to syslog, and no error message sent to stdout. The process has the large amount of open files because it''s

On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 10:36:14AM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Here in the Xiph community things are a little askew. The people > with the code (Monty, Jean-Marc, Josh Coalson etc and the Annodex > team) seem to let Arc (who has yet to show any contribution > anywhere near the same league as any of the above) run the show > and trammple over people who show far more merit.

This is off topic and only tangentially related to statistics or R (through "HARK"ing -- Hypothesizing After Results are Known). But given the research interests of many on this list, I thought others would enjoy it. My apologies if I have overstepped (please let me know if so). Also, PLEASE DON'T RESPOND ON THIS LIST (privately is fine). This is just FYI. I don't know whether

One thing to watch out for is adjustments: - if the data is not adjusted for dividends and splits then you may be able to just download data since your last download yourself but depending on what you want to do with the data you may get misleading results. For example, if the stock trades at $100 and there is a 2 for 1 split then the next day there will be twice as many shares with each share

Hi Timo and others, I'm using test32 since today and I'm getting this error once every 2 hours or so: dovecot: Jul 30 20:21:26 Error: IMAP(jens at gutzeit.at): open(/var/mail/data/jens/jens at gutzeit.at/maildir/.INBOX.Gentoo.Security/dovecot-uidlist) failed: Too many open files dovecot: Jul 30 20:21:26 Error: IMAP(jens at gutzeit.at): file maildir-uidlist.c: line 147

There are security updates upstream for CentOS (4 and 5) and it looks like the CentOS 5 ones have been rebuilt and rolled out. How come the CentOS 4 branch lags behind, or are the CentOS 5 devs different from the CentOS 4 devs? If more volunteers are needed I'm sure assistance could be offered by the CentOS community. Regards, Vandaman.

OvermindDL1 a écrit : > Been trying to build the trunk to test some things for about a week > now using VS8 (VS2k5). Tons of Warnings (like things first being > declared struct, being redefined class and so forth, those need to be > fixed, but are otherwise not harmful), and a *lot* of errors. Being > trunk I figured just the normal trunk-type issues, but it has been > going on

The ticket clinic, What Is U.S. Copyright Law? The US Copyright Law grants rights to individuals for the works they create. The US Copyright Act of 1790 has changed over the years. The current basis of US copyright law is based on the Copyright Act of 1976. US copyright law is relatively automatic. Once someone has an idea and produces it in tangible form, the creator is the copyright holder and

Hi! After upgrade I'm noticing many coredummps, below is backtrace: $ echo "bt"|gdb .... #0 o_stream_zlib_flush (stream=0xc8be5b27640) at ostream-zlib.c:222 222 if (o_stream_zlib_send_flush(zstream) < 0) (gdb) #0 o_stream_zlib_flush (stream=0xc8be5b27640) at ostream-zlib.c:222 #1 0x00007a695e8f09cd in o_stream_flush (stream=stream at entry=0xc8be5b276d0) at

APM BIOSes have many bugs regarding proper representation of the appropriate segment limits for calling the BIOS. By default, APM_RELAX_SEGMENTS is always turned on to support running the APM BIOS on these buggy machines. Keeping 64k limits poses very little danger to the kernel, because the pages where the APM BIOS is located will always be in low physical memory BIOS areas, which should

APM BIOSes have many bugs regarding proper representation of the appropriate segment limits for calling the BIOS. By default, APM_RELAX_SEGMENTS is always turned on to support running the APM BIOS on these buggy machines. Keeping 64k limits poses very little danger to the kernel, because the pages where the APM BIOS is located will always be in low physical memory BIOS areas, which should