search for: overspecification

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "overspecification".

Did you mean: openspecification
2015 Oct 13
2
RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
On 13 October 2015 at 17:09, Rafael Espíndola <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I assume the end objective of such a policy is to have more effective > communications, so it would be nice to have some examples to avoid it > instead hampering communications by pushing unnecessary political > correctness. +2!!! > * Small, on the side jokes are OK if people are not
2016 May 06
2
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct
Am 06.05.2016 um 01:26 schrieb Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev: > > There are > many many people who aren’t even commenting at all because they fear > being attacked in this thread. Now you're contradicting LLVM's own description that it's a friendly community. Also: How many is "many, many", actually? How many of these are really in fear, how many are just trying
2016 May 05
6
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct
Am 05.05.2016 um 10:58 schrieb C Bergström via llvm-dev: > Sincerely and pragmatically - what do you think will be different > after this is in place.. Bureaucracy is great, but what's broken or > pandemic that you're trying to fix? From the last discussion, I gather that it's an attempt to prevent damage before it can happen. I'm quite sceptical about that. It's
2016 May 05
7
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct
On 5 May 2016 at 23:06, Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org> wrote: > The point is that you wouldn’t know that from looking at the alternative code of conduct. I would need to spend months pouring through mailing lists posts and watching the community to feel its a good and safe place. Right, this is a very good point for having something written down. > One of the many reasons
2016 May 05
12
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct
Greetings all, This has come up a few times, and I would like to resume the effort to establish an LLVM code of conduct. First and foremost, many thanks to Philip Reames who sat down with me several months ago and worked through a number of suggestions that I've tried to incorporate into an updated patch with the draft text: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13741 I think his updates plus a few
2007 Oct 19
27
Assumption tests
Hi all, I''ve been thinking about the whole validator/relationship speccing issue, and I came up with a suggestion, which I''d love to get some feedback on. The full article is available at http://www.inter-sections.net/ 2007/10/19/what-to-test-and-specify-and-where-to-do-it/ , with the relevant bit being about halfway down, but here''s the gist of it: 1.
2015 Oct 13
33
RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
Greetings everyone, On behalf of the board of the LLVM Foundation, I’d like to start the process of introducing a formal code of conduct for the community. For a long time, various members of the community have been enforcing basic reasonable and respectful behavior, but to an outsider this may not be obvious. A public code of conduct advertises the behavior we expect of community members and