search for: overreacts

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 48 matches for "overreacts".

Did you mean: overreact
2015 Mar 27
5
Not getting updates?
I have no excludes in yum.conf. But I noticed something odd in the CentOS-Base.repo file. The [updates] section didn't have an explicit 'enabled=1' in it. Though, when I added it in, it made no difference. I have noticed that I do have some updated packages (like httpd) that are from February and appear to be the most recent based on the mirrors, but every mirror I hit I see no
2009 Aug 01
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: MachineInstr Annotations
On Jul 31, 2009, at 11:17 AM, David Greene wrote: > I'm getting to the point where I want to contribute some more > MachineInstr comment support for things like spills. As we've > discussed before, we don't have all of the information available > in AsmPrinter to synthesize the kind of comments that can be > helpful for debugging performance issues with register
2004 Dec 10
2
way to duplicate logs?
Hello- I am bit confused here. I have just had some issues with my box and I am looking for some opinions. I just had been denied access to my box...supposedly from a memory shortage in reference to my NIC....more specifically, mbuf clusters exhausted. Now I am looking in my /var/log/messages for when this started and I notice a discrepancy in my logs. Now from where I am looking, I see
2015 Mar 27
3
Not getting updates?
On 3/27/2015 12:36 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 3/27/2015 12:30 PM, Mark Haney wrote: >> I have no excludes in yum.conf. But I noticed something odd in the >> CentOS-Base.repo file. The [updates] section didn't have an explicit >> 'enabled=1' in it. Though, when I added it in, it made no >> difference. I >> have noticed that I do have some updated
2015 Jan 19
3
[PATCH] Makefile: add support for git svn clones
Hi, On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 03:31:32PM -0500, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > >>> git has an interface for cloning SVN repositories into git > >>> which some users might decide to use. For those users' > >>> surprise, the repository will always fail to build on svnonly > >>> target and it will exit early. > >>> > >>> The
2009 Jul 31
3
[LLVMdev] RFC: MachineInstr Annotations
I'm getting to the point where I want to contribute some more MachineInstr comment support for things like spills. As we've discussed before, we don't have all of the information available in AsmPrinter to synthesize the kind of comments that can be helpful for debugging performance issues with register allocators (our primary use for these kinds of comments). In order to get this
2015 Jan 19
2
[PATCH] Makefile: add support for git svn clones
Hi, On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 03:06:11PM -0500, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 19/01/2015 2:33 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > git has an interface for cloning SVN repositories into git which > > some users might decide to use. For those users' surprise, the > > repository will always fail to build on svnonly target and it will > > exit early. > > > > The problem
2011 Oct 28
1
Duplicated packages in CR repo?
Hi all, during upgrades of my systems via spacewalk and the continuous release repository, I encountered a problem with the rsyslog packages. It seems that the last update was build twice. Once with a correct name and once with a broken one (missing dot in the name before el6). On CR-repo mirrors: rsyslog-4.6.2-3.el6_1.4.x86_64.rpm 19-Oct-2011 13:04 rsyslog-4.6.2-3el6_1.4.x86_64.rpm
2011 Oct 05
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM IR is a compiler IR
On Oct 5, 2011, at 1:17 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 5 October 2011 01:19, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> I'm not sure what you're getting at here. My email was not intended to say that I'm not interested in LLVM improving - quite the contrary. My email was to rebut Dan's implicit claim that PNaCL and using LLVM as a portable IR is never going to
2005 Apr 04
1
tgAudioCodec.zip
Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin@USherbrooke.ca> wrote: > > > 1) Supporting the various versions of Speex is a nuisance, mainly > > because there is no #define or API call to query the version. > > It is possible to get the version using speex_lib_ctl(int request, void > *ptr). Possible requests are SPEEX_LIB_GET_MAJOR_VERSION, > SPEEX_LIB_GET_MINOR_VERSION,
2016 May 10
3
Opus encoding rate for very quiet noisefloor
Hi Opus list, Please forgive me if this has been asked before. I find that Opus encoder created in mode OPUS_APPLICATION_AUDIO (as opposed to _VOIP) is using a lot of bits to encode silent periods of speech. This is relevant to a voip application for which good quality music is desirable, and in which I add a minimal comfort noise (order of few bits loud, e.g. MLS signal of amplitude 1 or 2)
2006 Sep 20
3
Flac metadata at end?
Flac is great, but I have some questions about the way the metadata is stored. It takes an age to retag the file because all the data has to be shuffled around the disk. For most formats (ogg, mp3) the filesize is small, but I was thinking, why not have the metadata at the end of the file? This would not really be a problem for streaming, since you just read out the metadata from the end
2011 Oct 05
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM IR is a compiler IR
On 5 October 2011 16:18, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: > I think you're overreacting here.  There is nothing about OpenCL, RenderScript, > or VMKit that requires LLVM IR be used like a Platform, as I defined it in my > first paragraph.  I'm aware that some people would like to use LLVM IR as a > Platform, and I'm saying that there are important high-level
2007 Sep 09
11
Going beyond the default html formatter/report?
Hi! I wonder does anybody planning to go beyond the default html formatter/report? The current html report is nice and green but what about to go a little silly and enable also user input. For example to let customer to add a new pending spec, comments etc. I feel it might be mentally easier for some customers to jump into spec world when it is possible to give input at "the same
2016 Jun 03
1
Opus application_mode==AUDIO, 20ms framing issue?
...for mode=AUDIO at a bitrate of about 28000. > Quality drops audibly for voice signals when encoded at 20ms > framesize, versus quality at 10ms. This effect is mode=AUDIO only. > Using mode==VOIP shows no sig. difference between 10 and 20ms framing > at this bitrate. Pesq totally overreacts, as it is wont to do :) > However, I do hear a slight drop. Admittedly, 28kbps is a low bitrate > to be running in mode=AUDIO. Is this effect known? Is there a > difference in processing with audio mode between 10ms and (other > framesizes)? I reckon it will go away if I throw so...
2011 Oct 05
4
[LLVMdev] LLVM IR is a compiler IR
On 5 October 2011 01:19, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > I'm not sure what you're getting at here.  My email was not intended to say that I'm not interested in LLVM improving - quite the contrary.  My email was to rebut Dan's implicit claim that PNaCL and using LLVM as a portable IR is never going to work.  I'm arguing in the "opencl" and
2013 Feb 28
8
false low battery alarm
Hi, I have two types of UPS devices and one of them (APC) gave me a false "low battery" alert. I can't reproduce the problem... Also, there was nothing apparently wrong with the UPS at the time of the false alert. All I could do was grab the driver values within a minute after the "low battery" notification. These are the values: battery.runtime.low : 120
2005 Apr 26
1
tgAudioCodec.zip
I have (finally) posted my Speex wrapper classes. They are at: http://www.grandgent.com/spx/tgAudioCodec.zip I followed your recommendations and they worked fine with 1.1.0. However, I'm still having the same problem with 1.1.7 that I had the last time I tried to upgrade. I'm using the same code with both versions, except for calling speex_encode_int instead of speex_encode, and
2015 Mar 27
0
Not getting updates?
On 3/27/2015 12:30 PM, Mark Haney wrote: > I have no excludes in yum.conf. But I noticed something odd in the > CentOS-Base.repo file. The [updates] section didn't have an explicit > 'enabled=1' in it. Though, when I added it in, it made no difference. I > have noticed that I do have some updated packages (like httpd) that are > from February and appear to be the
2015 Mar 27
0
Not getting updates?
On 03/27/2015 03:27 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:46:20PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 3/27/2015 12:36 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >>> On 3/27/2015 12:30 PM, Mark Haney wrote: >>>> I have no excludes in yum.conf. But I noticed something odd in the >>>> CentOS-Base.repo file. The [updates] section didn't have an explicit