search for: overreaction

I have no excludes in yum.conf. But I noticed something odd in the CentOS-Base.repo file. The [updates] section didn't have an explicit 'enabled=1' in it. Though, when I added it in, it made no difference. I have noticed that I do have some updated packages (like httpd) that are from February and appear to be the most recent based on the mirrors, but every mirror I hit I see no

On Jul 31, 2009, at 11:17 AM, David Greene wrote: > I'm getting to the point where I want to contribute some more > MachineInstr comment support for things like spills. As we've > discussed before, we don't have all of the information available > in AsmPrinter to synthesize the kind of comments that can be > helpful for debugging performance issues with register

Hello- I am bit confused here. I have just had some issues with my box and I am looking for some opinions. I just had been denied access to my box...supposedly from a memory shortage in reference to my NIC....more specifically, mbuf clusters exhausted. Now I am looking in my /var/log/messages for when this started and I notice a discrepancy in my logs. Now from where I am looking, I see

On 3/27/2015 12:36 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 3/27/2015 12:30 PM, Mark Haney wrote: >> I have no excludes in yum.conf. But I noticed something odd in the >> CentOS-Base.repo file. The [updates] section didn't have an explicit >> 'enabled=1' in it. Though, when I added it in, it made no >> difference. I >> have noticed that I do have some updated

...pository compilation with the availability of a specific SCM > > tool ? > > > > I mean, R just won't build unless you have svn info available, I > > think that's pretty odd. Printing a warning would be another > > possibility, but exitting build is almost an overreaction. > > That's just false. Build from a tarball, and you can store it anyway > you like. I'm talking about the SVN repository. Building from a tarball prevents me from tracking R's revisions, don't you think ? But as I said, if the community doesn't want to support a gi...

I'm getting to the point where I want to contribute some more MachineInstr comment support for things like spills. As we've discussed before, we don't have all of the information available in AsmPrinter to synthesize the kind of comments that can be helpful for debugging performance issues with register allocators (our primary use for these kinds of comments). In order to get this

...'t you think it's a bit odd to couple the repository compilation with the availability of a specific SCM tool ? I mean, R just won't build unless you have svn info available, I think that's pretty odd. Printing a warning would be another possibility, but exitting build is almost an overreaction. But fair enough, no need to spend days discussing $subject if the community doesn't want to support git svn clone ;-) cheers -- balbi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digi...

Hi all, during upgrades of my systems via spacewalk and the continuous release repository, I encountered a problem with the rsyslog packages. It seems that the last update was build twice. Once with a correct name and once with a broken one (missing dot in the name before el6). On CR-repo mirrors: rsyslog-4.6.2-3.el6_1.4.x86_64.rpm 19-Oct-2011 13:04 rsyslog-4.6.2-3el6_1.4.x86_64.rpm

On Oct 5, 2011, at 1:17 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 5 October 2011 01:19, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> I'm not sure what you're getting at here. My email was not intended to say that I'm not interested in LLVM improving - quite the contrary. My email was to rebut Dan's implicit claim that PNaCL and using LLVM as a portable IR is never going to

Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin@USherbrooke.ca> wrote: > > > 1) Supporting the various versions of Speex is a nuisance, mainly > > because there is no #define or API call to query the version. > > It is possible to get the version using speex_lib_ctl(int request, void > *ptr). Possible requests are SPEEX_LIB_GET_MAJOR_VERSION, > SPEEX_LIB_GET_MINOR_VERSION,

Hi Opus list, Please forgive me if this has been asked before. I find that Opus encoder created in mode OPUS_APPLICATION_AUDIO (as opposed to _VOIP) is using a lot of bits to encode silent periods of speech. This is relevant to a voip application for which good quality music is desirable, and in which I add a minimal comfort noise (order of few bits loud, e.g. MLS signal of amplitude 1 or 2)

Flac is great, but I have some questions about the way the metadata is stored. It takes an age to retag the file because all the data has to be shuffled around the disk. For most formats (ogg, mp3) the filesize is small, but I was thinking, why not have the metadata at the end of the file? This would not really be a problem for streaming, since you just read out the metadata from the end

On 5 October 2011 16:18, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: > I think you're overreacting here.  There is nothing about OpenCL, RenderScript, > or VMKit that requires LLVM IR be used like a Platform, as I defined it in my > first paragraph.  I'm aware that some people would like to use LLVM IR as a > Platform, and I'm saying that there are important high-level

Hi! I wonder does anybody planning to go beyond the default html formatter/report? The current html report is nice and green but what about to go a little silly and enable also user input. For example to let customer to add a new pending spec, comments etc. I feel it might be mentally easier for some customers to jump into spec world when it is possible to give input at "the same

Hi Kevin, Are you saying that the quality is good at 20 ms and bad at 10 ms, or the reverse? Also, is this speech or music? What tool, what options? In general, it helps a lot if you post the sample (input and output). Cheers, Jean-Marc On 06/03/2016 12:48 PM, Kevin Connor wrote: > Hi Opus list, > > I'm noticing a discontinuity in the quality between use of 10ms and > 20ms

On 5 October 2011 01:19, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > I'm not sure what you're getting at here.  My email was not intended to say that I'm not interested in LLVM improving - quite the contrary.  My email was to rebut Dan's implicit claim that PNaCL and using LLVM as a portable IR is never going to work.  I'm arguing in the "opencl" and

Hi, I have two types of UPS devices and one of them (APC) gave me a false "low battery" alert. I can't reproduce the problem... Also, there was nothing apparently wrong with the UPS at the time of the false alert. All I could do was grab the driver values within a minute after the "low battery" notification. These are the values: battery.runtime.low : 120

I have (finally) posted my Speex wrapper classes. They are at: http://www.grandgent.com/spx/tgAudioCodec.zip I followed your recommendations and they worked fine with 1.1.0. However, I'm still having the same problem with 1.1.7 that I had the last time I tried to upgrade. I'm using the same code with both versions, except for calling speex_encode_int instead of speex_encode, and

On 3/27/2015 12:30 PM, Mark Haney wrote: > I have no excludes in yum.conf. But I noticed something odd in the > CentOS-Base.repo file. The [updates] section didn't have an explicit > 'enabled=1' in it. Though, when I added it in, it made no difference. I > have noticed that I do have some updated packages (like httpd) that are > from February and appear to be the

On 03/27/2015 03:27 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:46:20PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 3/27/2015 12:36 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >>> On 3/27/2015 12:30 PM, Mark Haney wrote: >>>> I have no excludes in yum.conf. But I noticed something odd in the >>>> CentOS-Base.repo file. The [updates] section didn't have an explicit