search for: overreach

...ere, I thought I might get some guidance. I''m happily developing everything on my PowerBook, and loving it. Yeah, TextMate is way cool. But all my clients keep sending me copy in Microsoft Word format and the curly quotes, ellipses, dashes, etc. turn into question marks. This might be overreaching, but is there some way to open the Word doc, Cmd+A/Cmd+C, then pop into TextMate and Cmd+V getting the entities (curlies, etc.) straightened out or converted to HTML entities? Is anyone else experiencing this as a problem? It''s hair-pulling crazy but (um) it doesn''t happen...

...amba share from Windows 2000 SP3 with Total commander 5.5. When user reach soft limit, then he'll get a warning message "Low space, do you want to continue ?". Copy can be forced and up to this moment everything is ok. But at moment when trying to copy a file which will cause to overreach hard quota limit, then happens this: - warning message is displayed but user is allowed to enforce copy. - Windows then displays error message windows with (translated): "Delayed write failed ... Data were lost" - Destination file has same size as source, but content is different! - An...

...t reset and seems to keep receiving signals from the kernel module to prevent it from rebooting. I don't know anymore. I replaced vtun with OpenVPN for the ethernet tunneling, but that does not seem to matter. Please advice, I am lost. Would upgrading to kernel 2.6.1 be a valid solution? Am I overreaching the possibilities of the bridging functionality? Am I overlooking some pitfall? With kind and desperate regards, ing. Jeroen Hoek

...ng harassment of a member of the LLVM community in social media: Covered Sending rude emails to a member of the LLVM community with whom you have a relationship outside of the project: Probably not covered, unless it’s directly related to LLVM Some example that people are worried would constitute overreach: Not covered Some other examples that people are concerned must be covered: Covered This document would provide guidance for the CoC enforcement committee, but would not be part of the official CoC. David -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime....

Folks: I know this may be overreaching, but are we missing what's important? WHY do the zeros occur? Are they values less then a known or unknown LOD? -- and/or is there positive mass on zero? In either case, using logs to calculate a geometric mean may not make sense. Paraphrasing Greg Snow, what is the scientific question? What...

I’ve put up a patch here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79769 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D79769> that adds a unified pipeline that targets can opt-into. It has some similarities with forcing fallbacks, but uses a different mechanism to do so to preserve the abort behavior. It therefore requires that every GISel pass needs to explicitly check whether the GISel selector is being requested rather

Hi, Are there any docs for combining parameter matchers, or some way to define optional parameters? I''m trying to match something like: .find( 42 ) || .find( 42, {:conditions=>nil,:includes=>nil} ) Or for that matter, 42 followed by nothing or anything... Halp? I''ve tried different nested combos with any_of/all_of/anything, but getting lost trying. --Andrew

...ny extraneous whitespace. But the patch below strikes me as a potential solution that shouldn''t cause any additional problems and probably represents the desired behavior. In fact, it might even be better to strip all strings returned from the collectTextNodes* function, or that might be overreaching a bit. --Bryan --- ./src/controls.js.orig 2008-03-20 10:35:44.017733000 -0400 +++ ./src/controls.js 2008-03-20 10:36:30.861783400 -0400 @@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ if(nodes.length>0) value = Element.collectTextNodes(nodes[0], this.options.select); } else value = Eleme...

...still use the same calling convention as kvm. KVM in more recent incarnations stopped injecting a fault when a guest tried to use the VMCALL instruction from ring 1, so lguest under kvm fails to make hypercalls. It was nice to share code with our KVM cousins, but this was overreach. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Matias Zabaljauregui <zabaljauregui at gmail.com> Cc: Avi Kivity <avi at redhat.com> arch/x86/include/asm/lguest_hcall.h | 29 +++++++++++++--- arch/x86/lguest/boot.c | 61 ++++++++++++...

...still use the same calling convention as kvm. KVM in more recent incarnations stopped injecting a fault when a guest tried to use the VMCALL instruction from ring 1, so lguest under kvm fails to make hypercalls. It was nice to share code with our KVM cousins, but this was overreach. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Matias Zabaljauregui <zabaljauregui at gmail.com> Cc: Avi Kivity <avi at redhat.com> arch/x86/include/asm/lguest_hcall.h | 29 +++++++++++++--- arch/x86/lguest/boot.c | 61 ++++++++++++...

...mission should extend to making the converted VM bootable on "Hetzner Cloud".) Rich has recently added tools for working with the virtio devices in windows guests; maybe those can be employed as extra (manual) steps before or after the conversion. Third, the last patch in the series is overreaching IMO; it switches the default. That causes a behavior change for such conversions that have been working well, and have been thoroughly tested. It doesn't just add a new use case, it throws away an existent use case for the new one's sake, IIUC. I don't like that. Again -- fully defe...

...“the committee reserves the right to kick you out for any behaviour that violates our standards which you exhibit anywhere, even if it is completely unrelated to the llvm community”. Personally, I’m just going to ignore it, and thus don’t really care whether it stays or goes — but I do find it overreaching and intrusive, and completely inappropriate in such a code of conduct. On Jun 30, 2016, at 5:11 PM, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > That's just a residual clause. > It's not sanely possible to enumerate all the possibilities here (IE if you...

Renato Golin via Openmp-dev <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > We already have tests in clang that check for diagnostics, IR and > other things. Expanding those can handle 99.9% of what Clang could > possibly do without descending into assembly. I agree that for a great many things this is sufficient. > Assembly errors are more complicated than just "not generating

> -----Original Message----- > From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org] > Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 2:52 PM > To: Daniel Berlin > Cc: Robinson, Paul; llvm-dev; LLDB; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org; openmp-dev > (openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org); Rafael Espíndola > Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] FYI: Landing the initial > draft for an LLVM Code of

On 9 December 2014 at 20:50, Michael Beck <eliteknipser at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, thanks for the fast response. > I know I do can edit de/Frontpage and my userpage. It's not new for me. > > But I can't create de/TipsAndTricks/NTFS > That's what I asked for in the first place and that's what I checked each time. A mistake. > Because...Well,... I tried other

On 13 October 2015 at 17:16, Kuperstein, Michael M via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > The FreeBSD CoC is, IMHO, much better in this respect ( https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-of-conduct.html ). Nice! This is so succinct and beautiful! It doesn't need an overseeing foundation to take opaque decisions, and focus on what's really important: the code. I

...alue conversion (i.e. it is loaded), > - it is the LHS of an assignment operator (including the > compound assignments), > - it is the base of a member access (with .) and the resulting l-value > is accessed (recall that x->y is defined as ((*x).y), > > I think this is overreaching. The member access has undefined behavior if there isn't an object of the right type designated by the lvalue, which is a much stronger requirement than that the alignment holds (if the base is misaligned, you still get immediate UB, even with your proposed change, because there is no object...

That's just a residual clause. It's not sanely possible to enumerate all the possibilities here (IE if you stalk and murder someone in the llvm community, you are going to get kicked out of the community, regardless of if you did it in a controlled space) I mean, i'm subject to legal ethics rules that are very similar, and those could get me kicked out of an entire profession :) I

Since commits b28cd1dc ("Remove requested_guestcaps / rcaps"), f0afc439 ("Remove guestcaps_block_type Virtio_SCSI") support for installing virtio-scsi driver is missing in virt-v2v. AFAIU plans and demands for bringing this feature back have been out there for a while. E.g. I've found a corresponding issue which is still open [1]. The code in b28cd1dc, f0afc439 was

C 6.3.2.3p7 (N1548) says: A pointer to an object type may be converted to a pointer to a different object type. If the resulting pointer is not correctly aligned) for the referenced type, the behavior is undefined. C++ [expr.reinterpret.cast]p7 (N4527) defines pointer conversions in terms of conversions from void*: An object pointer can be explicitly converted to an object pointer of a