search for: overpowering

Hi, anybody has installed CentOS on an lanner appliance...? Eg. http://www.lannerinc.com/products/all-purpose-box-computers/industrial-automation/lec-2126 I was planning to buy an hp microserver to make a "small" CentOS firewall (and more since it is overpowered), but I am wondering if I could go for a lot smaller and with no fan/noise... but at the same time a bit more expensive...

I would like to start a discussion centred around the various ways one might serve up configuration files from an Asterisk server (I know, it's better to use a secondary server for all this, but let's talk about a smaller system). The types of things being served would include: - Logo image for sets that support that - XML directory files - XML or raw text configuration files -

We're looking at implementing Asterisk in our department in the near future, we're looking at anywhere from 15-25 extensions. The machine we were looking at running this on was a Quad Xeon 450mhz (2MB L2 Cache) w/ 1GB of ram. I've heard bad things about running Asterisk on SMP machines? Would we be running into any performance issues with this machine? Tim Jackson Network Engineer

Hi, all I am trying to use the label_wrap_gen function in this website. https://github.com/hadley/ggplot2/wiki/labeller I tried to make a long name like this Light and heavy good vehicles (diesel) -\nGVX f2 = facet_grid(vehicle ~ ., labeller=label_wrap_gen(width=15)) eventually, I got something like this in my label... *Light and heavy good vehicles (diesel) - GVX* I suppose the

Hypothetical question.. Lets say there is a situation where you are using the highest compression codecs for all extensions (I guess that would be G.729) and the load on a single server is overpowering the most powerful single processor(lets say SMP is not an option).. So two or more servers are required.. Or The situation is that you need fault tolerance so want to have two Asterisk servers serving the same population of users and all users are able to authenticate to both servers (I guess...

Devin Campbell wrote: > >> http://www.starbeamllc.com/images/feedback.mp3 > I guess my next question is: is there something special about my stream > or my songs that's causing this? I'll have to do some experimentation. Owtch, my ears. :( I find that 16 kHz beep most irritating, it hurts even at low volumes. ;P Anyways, the humming you hear is actually multiple tones,

I have a proposal from RackSpace to put icecast on the following hardware at their server farm. Can someone give me a "guesstimate" of how many listeners each box can support? Proposed hardware by RackSpace for each server box: Dual 866 MHz processor 2 GB ECC RAM 100 Mbps connection I need to know how many listeners can connect to each of these boxes. I don't know how to

...help would be appreciated. I am continually getting people misreading the lattice plots because they are expecting the strip (with the factor names in them) to be below the graph. Is there anyway of achieving this. Secondly, from a more personal note I find the grid formed by the axes to be a bit overpowering and would like to make it a little less bold by changing it to a grey of some kind. I can't see that the scales options have anythig in their that I could use. I can change the label colours and tick marks, but then I draw a blank. While I'm on a role, I find that quite often I have to re...

Given my experience of running multiple streams on an old 486, I'd say you will run out of bandwidth before you overpower the server. At 01:53 PM 1/13/02 -0800, Peter Skye wrote: >I have a proposal from RackSpace to put icecast on the following >hardware at their server farm. Can someone give me a "guesstimate" of >how many listeners each box can support? >

On Fri, 6 Aug 1999 ihaka@stat.auckland.ac.nz wrote: > On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 12:08:05AM +0200, Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote: > > Ross Ihaka <ihaka@stat.auckland.ac.nz> writes: > > > > I played around with this earlier today. There's nothing special about > > dataframes, S does the same with any classed object. I.e. > > > >

Hi All, It is normal that Windows applications run _very_ slow under Wine? I'm talking about simple application, like notepad, winmine. My system: FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE RAM 128M CPU Celeron 466MHz Wine wine-2001.08.24 XFree86-4.1.0_6 Everything I run from TWM (manager which is run by startx). TIA

> Given my experience of running multiple streams on an > old 486, I'd say you will run out of bandwidth before you > overpower the server. Bandwidth is indeed the biggest resources. We used dual CPU p3-600's at icast. We had 4 machines and we built it to easily handle 12,000 listeners over 500 streams. Only 3 were active at any one time ( the 4th was failover ). CPU load

(1) ?cbind claims The generic functions `cbind' and `rbind' take a sequence of vector and/or matrix arguments and combine them as the columns or rows, respectively, of a matrix. Note: The method dispatching is not done via `UseMethod(..)', but by C-internal dispatching. Therefore, there's no need for, e.g., `rbind.default'. but my cbind.ts

At noon, I often get "dovecot: Maximum number of mail processes exceeded" I'm at my wits end, which parameter needs to be increased further? # 1.1.3: /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf protocols: imap imaps pop3s ssl_cert_file: /etc/ssl/certs/postamt.pem ssl_key_file: /etc/ssl/private/postamt.key disable_plaintext_auth: no version_ignore: yes login_dir: /usr/local/var/run/dovecot/login

Hi, I'm a new user of R. My background is Electrical Engineering, so please bear with me if this is a silly question. I'm trying to assess whether the results of an experiment satisfy the hypothesis of homoscedasticity (my ultimate goal is to use ANOVA). The result of the experiment is mean delay (dT), which depends on three factors, topology, drift, and lambda. The first two factors are

Hi, I get my Email from my own SMTP server on the internet using "fetchmail". Some time ago I did the smart thing and configured dovecot to use SSL and the letsencrypt certificate that automatically renews. Welllll..... a few days ago my certificate expired and the fetchmail deamon running in the background had nowhere to complain. So I didn't notice. It turns out that dovecot

Hey Everyone, We are in the works of planning a new * installation for our company. We have 20 users in our main office and 5 users in a remote office a couple of states away. Our call volume for the main office will be anywhere from 5-10 concurrent calls. The remote office will have about 3 heavy users with two users making calls occasionally. Right now we have an existing PBX. We have a

Two machines (NFS Server: running ZFS / Client: disk-less), both are running FreeBSD r253506. The NFS client starts to deadlock processes within a few hours. It usually gets worse from there on. The processes stay in "D" state. I haven't been able to reproduce it when I want it to happen. I only have to wait a few hours until the deadlocks occur when traffic to the client machine