search for: overloads

I am using gcc 3.4.6 to build LLVM, and am encountering overloaded/ambiguous errors in several files... % gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.6/specs Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --disable-checking --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-libunwind-exceptions

In my User auth scheme I have a userlevel. I''ve overloaded the User class operators like this: def >(item) if item.class == "User" self.userlevel > item.userlevel else self.userlevel > item end end (other operators are overloaded in essentially the same way). As I understand it, using the operator ">" inside the overloaded

Hello, Can you please tell me what the overload point is for OPUS in dBm0 or dBV? As an example, the G.711 A law codec has an overload point of +3.14 dBm0 across a 600 ohm circuit. In ITU-T G.100.1 section 5.8 you can read more about the relationship between dBm0 and dBov. In that same section you can see that the G.711 A law, u law, and G.722 codec overload points are also defined.

Hello, I was trying to use __attribute__((overloadable)) for functions accepting enumerated types but hadn't succeeded so far. Clang 3.1 and 3.2 failed to compile the following example. /* clang -x c foo.cpp */ typedef enum __One {DUMMY_1} One; typedef enum {DUMMY_2} Two; enum Three {DUMMY_3}; __attribute__((overloadable)) void foo(One); __attribute__((overloadable)) void foo(Two);

(1) It seems to me that, generally, in R it is not possible to overload functions. Is that right? (2) Assuming that the above is true, or partially true, is there any extra packages to handle overloading in R? (3) Assuming (1) is TRUE and (2) is FALSE, can anyone provide some advice on developing some function that understand what the arguments are and then calls the right overloaded

Dear all, I would like to put these two lines together logictoReduce<-((Overloads-1)%%FreqN)==(SpanIndex-1) #0...3 refer to sub spans 1 to 4 Overloads<-Overloads[logictoReduce==TRUE] and do it like this Overloads<-Overloads[((Overloads-1)%%FreqN)==(SpanIndex-1)] which does not seem to work. Could you please explain me what might be the problem for that? B.R Alex...

I want to overload the = operator for one of the attributes in a model to run a filter on the input. However I can''t do this: def attribute=(data) self.attribute = filter(data) end because that creates an infinite recursive loop. How do I get around this? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...to ensure that the correct overload is executed. For example WritableDatabase_replace_document($handle, (int)$docid, $document); // Replace by docid WritableDatabase_replace_document($handle, (string)$uniqueterm, $document); // Replace by term Other than that the new bindings with emulated overloads are great, much kudos. //Mikael

On Feb 19, 2008, at 1:11 AM, aditya vishnubhotla wrote: > Hi, > I tried creating variable argument intrinsics which > are to be placeholders for some instructions which > should not be executed by the backend. > > Kindly help me with the errors in my "migrate_begin" > intrinsic creation > > //Additions made to Intrinsics.td file: > > def

Hi, I tried creating variable argument intrinsics which are to be placeholders for some instructions which should not be executed by the backend. Kindly help me with the errors in my "migrate_begin" intrinsic creation //Additions made to Intrinsics.td file: def llvm_migrate_begin : LLVMType<iAny>; def int_migrate_begin :

Hello All, I have been modifying LLVM a project of mine, and have encountered issues with overloading an intrinsic function. I have defined two types, abit (which is mapped, in Intrinsics.td, to i128) and qbit (accordingly mapped to i16). I would like my intrinsic function, CNOT(x,y), to accept either an abit or a qbit for each argument, so I overload with iAny and llvm_anyint_ty, as seemed to

Hi, I'm trying to implement an overloading behavior to some of our builtin functions, and came across the following comment in SemaExpr.cpp // Check for overloaded calls. This can happen even in C due to extensions. If (Fn->getType() == Context.OverloadTy) { .... I was wondering which C extensions is this referring to? Thanks Ali -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment

Hi, I need some help to get some of the object orientation, specifically the methods that overload the basic arithmetic operations, from sample C++ code to R. I don't have experience with such advanced language features inside of R. So I was wondering if some of you could help me out in this regard. I have written a simple demonstration of a forward mode automatic differentiator in C++ and

Hi, I need some help to get some of the object orientation, specifically the methods that overload the basic arithmetic operations, from sample C++ code to R. I don't have experience with such advanced language features inside of R. So I was wondering if some of you could help me out in this regard. I have written a simple demonstration of a forward mode automatic differentiator in C++ and

Hi David, The error shows that the clang source code uses this intrinsic as well, but in the old form. You need to modify the clang source code (where this intrinsic is used) to consider the overloaded operands. The assert would show the trace where clang uses this intrinsic. Hope this helps, Anna > On Jul 26, 2016, at 3:21 PM, David Noursi via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>

Dear all, I am experiencing some problems with S4 method overloading. I have defined a generic for graphics:plot, using setGeneric("plot", useAsDefault = plot) and with importFrom('graphics', 'plot') and exportMethods('plot') in the NAMESPACE file of pkg A. I then proceed to define a method for signature c('myS4class', 'missing'). This works

This is going to be a problem. I don't appear to be able to rename a method once it's declared. So if the core bindings file declares some overloaded operators, functions or constructors, it's impossible to move them out of the way in only some of the bindings. Since Python supports overloading, I can't think of any solution to this other than maintaining two different xapian.i

I notice that there's a lot of inconsistency in the various LLVM classes with respect to convenience methods. Here's some examples: For creating GEPS, IRBuilder has: CreateGEP (2 overloads) CreateInBoundsGEP (2 overloads) CreateConstGEP1_32 CreateConstInBoundsGEP1_32 CreateConstGEP2_32 CreateConstInBoundsGEP2_32 CreateConstGEP1_64 CreateConstInBoundsGEP1_64 CreateConstGEP2_64 CreateConstInBoundsGEP2_64 CreateStructGEP All of which are very useful. However, ConstE...

Hi, I think we are overloading the Layout references for garbage collection. If you are creating a reference (kindLayoutAfter) from A to B, that may not mean that you cannot garbage collect B for the end user. My thought on Layout references was that it only guarantees that atoms appear in Layout reference order. Why are we overloading this for Garbage collection (aside from saving space/code)

Hi, I see this when building llvm-gcc on x86-32 linux: xgcc -Bgcc/ -B/usr/local/gnat-llvm/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/local/gnat-llvm/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/gnat-llvm/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/local/gnat-llvm/i686-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../gcc-4.2.llvm/libgomp -I. -I../../../gcc-4.2.llvm/libgomp/config/linux/x86