search for: overlaps

+ llvm-dev On 25 Aug 2020, at 13:53, Florian Hahn wrote: > Hi, > > It appears that Clang generates calls to `llvm.memcpy` with > potentially overlapping arguments in some cases. > > For the snippet below > > struct S > { > char s[25]; > }; > > struct S *p; > > void test2() { > ... > foo (&b, 1); > b = a; > b = *p; > ...

Hi, Within my R code, I am using a C++ function as below: overlaps <- matrix(0, nrow=B, ncol=length(N)) overlaps.P <- matrix(0, nrow=B, ncol=length(N)) .C("speedUp", D, S, pD, pS, nrow(D), as.integer(N), length(N), ssq[i], i, as.integer(B), overlaps, overlaps.P, DUP=FALSE) the function "speedUp", is supposed t...

Dear all I'm working on the implementation of the MDCT for the processor ARM-Cortex-M4 I'm trying to replicate the behavior of the MDCT for several overlapped values however I realized that current implementation of the MDCT is very close to the theory only in case in which we have and overlap exactly equal to N/2 where N is the size of the input vector as is shown in the examples for

...ith R but not R-devel? And another question is related to using .Call. Based on the manual page, I do not need to change the function parameters when using .Call. So I can run like this: .Call("sppedUp", D, S, pD, pS, nrow(D), as.integer(N), length(N), ssq[i], i, as.integer(B), overlaps, overlaps.P) But I am receiving the memory(?) related error: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc' what(): std::bad_alloc Now that I am running the code using .Call. Thanks. On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wr...

Dear R users, Any idea of how to calculate an area of an overlap between two functions? The only R build in function that I found is I Similarity Statistic for Quantifying Niche Overlap and I am really not sure if this function is producing exactly what I am interested in since I was plotting functions and often got confused results (for example: got high value for the overlap of one pair and low

Hello Everyone, I am trying to overlap a plot with a data set in the form of a data frame. Its very easy to overlap the data using "points" function. But the only problem I am facing is "Standard deviation bar" on the plot. data <- data.frame( x = c(3.00,2.00,3.80,2.40,2.00), error = c(0.0,0.4,1.1,0.7,0.5) ) I tried plotrix, segments but they are making a new plot

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 12:56 PM, <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > > 1. In a CHECK-DAG group, don't let the matches for patterns overlap. > > 2. Add a new CHECK-DAG-N directive, where N is some integer, to express > > that a pattern must have N non-overlapping matches. > > I think #1 is much more intuitive and easy to describe/document than #2. > Changing

Hi there, Is there any package which can calculate the overlapping area of two polygons or output the coordinates of the overlapping of two polygons? Thanks. Haiyong

Hi list, I have a question on how to identify the overlapped items from two vectors: >x<-c(0,1,2) >y<-c(1,2,2,3) and plot the number of the overlapped as well as non-overlapped in a diagram? Thanks much, Allen [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I am attempting to use phyper to test the significance of two overlapping lists. I keep getting a zero and wondered if that was determining non-significance of my overlap or a p-value too small to calculate? overlap = 524 lista = 2784 totalpop = 54675 listb = 1296 phyper(overlap, lista, totalpop, listb,lower.tail = FALSE, log.p=F) [1] 0 If I plug in some different values I get a p-value but

Dear lists, any suggestion on how to write a function to return a TRUE if interval [a,b] overlaps the interval [c,d]. I've tried it but an error occur saying that 'could not find function v ; in addition warning message occur'. Below is my codes.Please help me sort this problem as i'm in process of learning of writing a function. Many thanks overlap<-function(m,n){ t=le...

I have 2 datafiles 'target' and 'observed' as shown below (I will gladly email these 2 small files to whomever). X25. And X75. Indicate the value of 25th and 75th-percentile of the target ('what should be') and the observed ('what is'). The i.value is simply the month. > target X i.value X25. X75. 1 one.month 1 10.845225 17.87237 2

I just stumbled across r332416, which was modifying a test with multiple identical CHECK-DAG directives, which reminded me I needed to get back to you about this... sorry for the slow response. > From: Joel E. Denny [mailto:jdenny.ornl at gmail.com] >> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 12:56 PM, <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: >>> 1. In a CHECK-DAG group, don't let the matches

Alexander Chemeris wrote: > Hi, > > Here are some questions from user point of view. :) > > On 5/29/08, Thorvald Natvig <thorvald at natvig.com> wrote: > >> I've done listening tests when converting wb_male.wav to 44.1, 48 and 8khz, >> and there aren't any obvious artifacts. I also did a 16=>16 test, and the >> results are delayed by 10ms

>> Yes, I plan to use it in a VoIP environment if I can get latency reduced to >> an acceptable level :) >> The latency depends directly on the overlap parameter, which also controls >> the quality. Higher quality => higher latency. You could set the overlap to >> 0, but that would give you some nasty artifacts. >> You can also resample with smaller block

Paul Robinson <paul.robinson at sony.com> writes: >> From: Joel E. Denny [mailto:jdenny.ornl at gmail.com] >>> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 12:56 PM, <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: >>>> 1. In a CHECK-DAG group, don't let the matches for patterns overlap. >>>> 2. Add a new CHECK-DAG-N directive, where N is some integer, to express

Hi, I like to generate two normal densities such that the overlapping area between them is 0.35. Is there any code/package available in R to do that?? Regards, Lavan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/densities-with-overlapping-area-of-0.35-tp19384741p19384741.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

When offset + length == exts->end the code which is shortening the extents is subtracting 0 from length. And it is not optimized out. Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com> --- server/extents.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/server/extents.c b/server/extents.c index d3d1a15ab97c..c422491601f0 100644 --- a/server/extents.c +++

> 1. In a CHECK-DAG group, don't let the matches for patterns overlap. > 2. Add a new CHECK-DAG-N directive, where N is some integer, to express > that a pattern must have N non-overlapping matches. I think #1 is much more intuitive and easy to describe/document than #2. Changing the meaning of DAG in that way is highly unlikely to affect any existing test, IMO. And if it does, my

hello all, I'm overlaying numerous scatter plots onto a map (done in PBSmodelling). In this case I'm placing each plot by setting par(fig) to the centroid of map polygons. The location/mapping part is not so important. There are cases of small overlaps for some plots (ie figures) so I'm keen to write or find a function that moves my small scatter plots so they don't overlap. A little like jitter, but not random in behaviour, it needs to move away from the plots it's overlapping. thanks to all Michael _________________________________...