search for: overlapping

+ llvm-dev On 25 Aug 2020, at 13:53, Florian Hahn wrote: > Hi, > > It appears that Clang generates calls to `llvm.memcpy` with > potentially overlapping arguments in some cases. > > For the snippet below > > struct S > { > char s[25]; > }; > > struct S *p; > > void test2() { > ... > foo (&b, 1); > b = a; > b = *p; > ... > } > > > Clang uses `llvm.memcpy` to copy the struct: &g...

Hi, Within my R code, I am using a C++ function as below: overlaps <- matrix(0, nrow=B, ncol=length(N)) overlaps.P <- matrix(0, nrow=B, ncol=length(N)) .C("speedUp", D, S, pD, pS, nrow(D), as.integer(N), length(N), ssq[i], i, as.integer(B), overlaps, overlaps.P, DUP=FALSE) the function "speedUp", is supposed to update matrices overlaps

Dear all I'm working on the implementation of the MDCT for the processor ARM-Cortex-M4 I'm trying to replicate the behavior of the MDCT for several overlapped values however I realized that current implementation of the MDCT is very close to the theory only in case in which we have and overlap exactly equal to N/2 where N is the size of the input vector as is shown in the examples for

Thanks! I went through the online posts which supports the power of .Call over .C. But my probably naive question is why does this work for my code with R but not R-devel? And another question is related to using .Call. Based on the manual page, I do not need to change the function parameters when using .Call. So I can run like this: .Call("sppedUp", D, S, pD, pS, nrow(D), as.integer(N),

...che Overlap and I am really not sure if this function is producing exactly what I am interested in since I was plotting functions and often got confused results (for example: got high value for the overlap of one pair and low for the other pair, while from the plot it looked like the first pair was overlapping better.) Can anyone please explain what's the reason behind such a behaviour? And does anyone has a suggestion of what function could be used for a calculation of an overlap area? The problem with 'Istat' function is also that it requires both data sets to have the same length, while I...

...rror = c(0.0,0.4,1.1,0.7,0.5) ) I tried plotrix, segments but they are making a new plot with data points n error bar. I want to Overlap this data sets on a plot with its Error bar. Can anyone help me with it. Many Thanks, Himanshu -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Overlapping-a-Plot-with-Dataframe-tp4639396.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 12:56 PM, <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > > 1. In a CHECK-DAG group, don't let the matches for patterns overlap. > > 2. Add a new CHECK-DAG-N directive, where N is some integer, to express > > that a pattern must have N non-overlapping matches. > > I think #1 is much more intuitive and easy to describe/document than #2. > Changing the meaning of DAG in that way is highly unlikely to affect any > existing test, IMO. And if it does, my first expectation is that the test > wasn't doing what the author intended an...

Hi there, Is there any package which can calculate the overlapping area of two polygons or output the coordinates of the overlapping of two polygons? Thanks. Haiyong

Hi list, I have a question on how to identify the overlapped items from two vectors: >x<-c(0,1,2) >y<-c(1,2,2,3) and plot the number of the overlapped as well as non-overlapped in a diagram? Thanks much, Allen [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I am attempting to use phyper to test the significance of two overlapping lists. I keep getting a zero and wondered if that was determining non-significance of my overlap or a p-value too small to calculate? overlap = 524 lista = 2784 totalpop = 54675 listb = 1296 phyper(overlap, lista, totalpop, listb,lower.tail = FALSE, log.p=F) [1] 0 If I plug in some different val...

Dear lists, any suggestion on how to write a function to return a TRUE if interval [a,b] overlaps the interval [c,d]. I've tried it but an error occur saying that 'could not find function v ; in addition warning message occur'. Below is my codes.Please help me sort this problem as i'm in process of learning of writing a function. Many thanks overlap<-function(m,n){

I have 2 datafiles 'target' and 'observed' as shown below (I will gladly email these 2 small files to whomever). X25. And X75. Indicate the value of 25th and 75th-percentile of the target ('what should be') and the observed ('what is'). The i.value is simply the month. > target X i.value X25. X75. 1 one.month 1 10.845225 17.87237 2

...] >> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 12:56 PM, <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: >>> 1. In a CHECK-DAG group, don't let the matches for patterns overlap. >>> 2. Add a new CHECK-DAG-N directive, where N is some integer, to express >>> that a pattern must have N non-overlapping matches. >> >> I think #1 is much more intuitive and easy to describe/document than #2. >> Changing the meaning of DAG in that way is highly unlikely to affect any >> existing test, IMO.  And if it does, my first expectation is that the test >> wasn't doing what...

Alexander Chemeris wrote: > Hi, > > Here are some questions from user point of view. :) > > On 5/29/08, Thorvald Natvig <thorvald at natvig.com> wrote: > >> I've done listening tests when converting wb_male.wav to 44.1, 48 and 8khz, >> and there aren't any obvious artifacts. I also did a 16=>16 test, and the >> results are delayed by 10ms

>> Yes, I plan to use it in a VoIP environment if I can get latency reduced to >> an acceptable level :) >> The latency depends directly on the overlap parameter, which also controls >> the quality. Higher quality => higher latency. You could set the overlap to >> 0, but that would give you some nasty artifacts. >> You can also resample with smaller block

...n Mon, May 7, 2018 at 12:56 PM, <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: >>>> 1. In a CHECK-DAG group, don't let the matches for patterns overlap. >>>> 2. Add a new CHECK-DAG-N directive, where N is some integer, to express >>>> that a pattern must have N non-overlapping matches. >>> >>> I think #1 is much more intuitive and easy to describe/document than #2. >>> Changing the meaning of DAG in that way is highly unlikely to affect any >>> existing test, IMO.  And if it does, my first expectation is that the test >>> wa...

Hi, I like to generate two normal densities such that the overlapping area between them is 0.35. Is there any code/package available in R to do that?? Regards, Lavan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/densities-with-overlapping-area-of-0.35-tp19384741p19384741.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

When offset + length == exts->end the code which is shortening the extents is subtracting 0 from length. And it is not optimized out. Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com> --- server/extents.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/server/extents.c b/server/extents.c index d3d1a15ab97c..c422491601f0 100644 --- a/server/extents.c +++

> 1. In a CHECK-DAG group, don't let the matches for patterns overlap. > 2. Add a new CHECK-DAG-N directive, where N is some integer, to express > that a pattern must have N non-overlapping matches. I think #1 is much more intuitive and easy to describe/document than #2. Changing the meaning of DAG in that way is highly unlikely to affect any existing test, IMO. And if it does, my first expectation is that the test wasn't doing what the author intended anyway. --paulr

...n/mapping part is not so important. There are cases of small overlaps for some plots (ie figures) so I'm keen to write or find a function that moves my small scatter plots so they don't overlap. A little like jitter, but not random in behaviour, it needs to move away from the plots it's overlapping. thanks to all Michael _______________________________________________________ Michael Folkes Salmon Stock Assessment Canadian Dept. of Fisheries & Oceans Pacific Biological Station [[alternative HTML version deleted]]