search for: overkilling

I ended up 'hacking' LMTP support into the external spam filter. Someone else already contributed 'real' patches to implement LMTP support, so once I go live with this mail platform it should be stable. Met vriendelijke groeten, William Edwards T. 040 - 711 44 96 E. wedwards at cyberfusion.nl ? ----- Original Message ----- From: Marc Roos (M.Roos at f1-outsourcing.eu) Date:

Maybe nice to share some details? -----Original Message----- To: Marc Roos; dovecot Subject: Re[4]: Lightweight LMTP daemon to avoid overkill MTA I ended up 'hacking' LMTP support into the external spam filter. Someone else already contributed 'real' patches to implement LMTP support, so once I go live with this mail platform it should be stable. Met vriendelijke groeten,

Hi, I was unclear in my question. The spam filter is only able to deliver mail over SMTP, not over LMTP.. So I would still need some kind of daemon that listens for SMTP and then offers incoming email to Dovecot's LMTP socket. Met vriendelijke groeten, William Edwards T. 040 - 711 44 96 E. wedwards at cyberfusion.nl ? ----- Original Message ----- From: Marc Roos (M.Roos at

Yes I am running sendmail next to dovecot on backend servers. That works ok. I have some problems with re-routing mail in a proxy setup. -----Original Message----- To: Marc Roos; dovecot Subject: Re[2]: Lightweight LMTP daemon to avoid overkill MTA Hi, I was unclear in my question. The spam filter is only able to deliver mail over SMTP, not over LMTP.. So I would still need some kind of

Hi, My situation is as follows. -An internet-facing spam filter relays email to destination mail server (Dovecot) with SMTP. - Dovecot should take email and deliver it to user's mailboxes. I guess I'd need LMTP for this. - An external SMTP relay is already in place. I am thinking of using Dovecot submission to relay to the external relaying cluster. So, both relaying and routing are done

Yes dovecot, /etc/dovecot/conf.d/20-lmtp.conf ;) service lmtp { chroot = client_limit = 1 drop_priv_before_exec = no executable = lmtp extra_groups = $default_internal_group group = idle_kill = 0 inet_listener lmtp { address = haproxy = no port = 24 reuse_port = no ssl = no } privileged_group = process_limit = 0 process_min_avail = 0 protocol = lmtp

Hi, I am developing a Rails application which should be in ONE language (not English). Globalize seems overkill for this purpose (do you agree?). So I''m trying some of the approaches on the wiki. In particular: http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/OverridingRailsMessagesInAnotherLanguage This *does* override the month names, but does *not* override the error messages. I''m

Hi Claudio Corvino via dovecot, We have received your request and a ticket has been created with Ticket ID - 22079. A support representative will be reviewing your request and will contact you shortly. To view the status of the ticket or add comments, please visit? https://support.atomia.com/helpdesk/tickets/22079 Speak to you soon, Atomia Support Team

Dear colleagues, I have a question about this commit: https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/commit/e9d910b0289c820852f7afa67f584cef1c05fe95#diff-a25e40214ca9c9f78abce22f23bf2abdb2a24384c6610d60bbb314aed534eb48R216 The function ensure_minimum_time_since effectively doubles the time spent in the input_userauth_request (mostly presumably in PAM). So if PAM processing is really slow, it will

Dear colleagues, May I ask you to explain whether I am wrong in my conclusions? On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 11:55?AM Dmitry Belyavskiy <dbelyavs at redhat.com> wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > I have a question about this commit: > >

Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: > May I ask you to explain whether I am wrong in my conclusions? I guess it's not clear what problem you are trying to solve. //Peter

Dear Peter, I'm trying to balance the original problem statement (protection from users enumeration) and avoid doubling time here if the process has already taken a long time to provide faster auth method iteration. I believe that a better solution is to set some arbitrary (probably configurable) timeout and, in case when we spend more time than that value, avoid doubling it. On Wed, Jun 28,

Hi, The subject says it all. I'm currently fiddling with CentOS to become comfortable with it. Starting from a minimal system (everything unchecked during install), I wanted to have a reasonable set of build tools. Roughly the equivalent of Debian's 'apt-get install build-essential'. I tried yum groupinstall "Development Tools", which resulted in a total of 108 MB

Hi all, I want to do some code reuse, and modules seem overkill. Is it possible to have something like this? A file called myuser.pp class myuser { user {...} file {...} ... } Then in site.pp have this: node ''foo.example.com'' { include myuser .. other things .. } node ''bar.example.com'' { include myuser .. other things .. } When I try this,

I have a few forms that I''d like users to fill out. The results of the form will be sent to a few addresses. What''s the least painless way to do this and keep everything DRY? There''s no database involved. Ideally, I''d like to email the form questions with the answers inline. Seems like using ActionMailer and separate email views would be overkill in this

Greetings, I have a USB external 2TB HDD with one NTFS partition which is to be used for backup up from about 5-8 workstations (all Win*) all are shut down when the office is closed I am playing around with Amanda server on Centos 5.7. (It is over 3 years since I last implemented Amanda for about 50 workstations mostly Fedora and couple of XP boxes -- it sang and danced quite nicely.) Now the

I need to add various header and footer dressings around groups of form fields for GUI goodness, and am wondering if there''s already something out there that will suit my needs. These headers/footers have special properties for display(title, help links, etc...). I want to be able to easily take advantage of the existing HTML helper methods provided for controllers, in a mini-layout type

I have a rather large bitcode file which when run through "llc -march arm -O0" produces an asm file of about 500Mb. Trying to assemble this file with the ios assembler on osx gives me lots of "branch out of range" errors thanks to jump instructions overflowing the +/-32Mb relative jump limit. I've tried running llc with the hidden "-arm-long-calls" option, which

tl;dr: Why are named arguments discouraged in `[.data.frame`, `[<-.data.frame` and `[[.data.frame`? (because this question is of the kind 'why is R designed like this?', I though R-devel would be more appropriate than R-help) ############################# Background: Now and then students presents there fancy functions like this:

Hi, I accidentally noticed the following line when building LLVM and Clang on Windows 7 x64 using Mingw64: Linking CXX shared library ..\..\..\..\bin\liblibclang.dll "Liblib" seems a bit overkill. FYI. BTW, for those who happen to search on LLVM, Clang, Windows, and Mingw64: The v3.1 release does NOT build with Mingw64. I believe this has been fixed in the Subversion sources as