Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "overill".
Did you mean:
overall
2010 Aug 09
0
[LLVMdev] llvm "iword" type
...>
> Yes, something like that would work. I have a bunch of platform
> dependent stuff I'm trying to insulate, so I'm creating a tool that
> runs when building my front-end that uses the LLVM libraries to
> generate a .bc file full of that stuff for me, but that might be
> overill for your case.
>
2010 Aug 09
3
[LLVMdev] llvm "iword" type
That and the possibility of differently sized pointers made me
hesitate to dive into implementing this. I guess nailing it down to
be the platform equivalent of size_t would be sensible here.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Eugene Toder <eltoder at gmail.com> wrote:
> Small nitpick: size_t is not guaranteed to be large enough to hold a
> pointer (only an array index, which can be