search for: overdo

...eciate any help you could offer. The super-super short explanation is that I'd like to draw a straight line through my data, accounting for spatial autocorrelation and using Poisson errors (I have count data). There's a longer explanation at the end of this e-mail, I just didn't want to overdo it at the start. There are three R functions that do at least some of what I would like, but I'm unclear on some of their specifics. 1. lme - Maybe models spatial autocorrelation, but doesn't allow for Poisson errors. I get mixed messages from The R Book. On p. 647, there's an example...

...es/dos500/dos500.ima label 3 KERNEL memdisk/memdisk APPEND initrd=images/dos600/dos600.ima In my 'menu.txt' i display all labels : 0. local disk 1. unatt. W2K SRV SP4 install 2. dos 5.00 3. dos 6.00 4. dos 6.20 5. dos 6.21 6. dos 6.22 etc... If i do not overdo the descriptions i get 23 lines on my screen, and i can use 3 or 4 columns - that's at least 69 boot options... Hope this helps. Regards, Rijk -----Original Message----- From: Aaron McSorley [mailto:aaron.mcsorley at amd.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 8:36 PM To: Philippe Gramoull? Cc...

...APPEND initrd=images/dos600/dos600.ima > > In my 'menu.txt' i display all labels : > > 0. local disk > 1. unatt. W2K SRV SP4 install > 2. dos 5.00 > 3. dos 6.00 > 4. dos 6.20 > 5. dos 6.21 > 6. dos 6.22 > etc... > If i do not overdo the descriptions i get 23 lines on my screen, and i can > use 3 > or 4 columns - that's at least 69 boot options... > > Hope this helps. > Regards, > Rijk > > -----Original Message----- > From: Aaron McSorley [mailto:aaron.mcsorley at amd.com] > Sent: Wednesday,...

Me too. I have changed some valid URLs in \url{} to \verb{} just to avoid these check NOTEs. I do appreciate the check for the validity of URLs in packages, especially those dead links (404), but discouraging URLs with status code other than 200 (such as 301) feels like overdoing the job. After I "hide" links from R CMD check with \verb{} , it will be hard to know if these links are still valid in the future. Regards, Yihui On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 1:17 PM Kevin Wright <kw.stat at gmail.com> wrote: > > Isn't the whole concept of DOI basically l...

Dear list, This is a simple question but I spent an hour on it without success. So I sorry to bother you. I fit a linear model "lm" and then did "anova". My idea is to run multiple pairwise comparision for several factor variables (f1, f2, f3, f4 each with its own levels, say "0", "1", "3" etc )at the same time and get statistics for each

Here's something really strange. ******************************************************** R> x <- 1:5 R> x [1] 1 2 3 4 5 R> test1 function (x) { structure(x, call = sys.call()) } R> test1(x) [1] 1 2 3 4 5 attr(,"call") test1(x) R> test2 function (x) { attr(x, "call") <- sys.call() x } R> test2(x) Error: stack overflow

Hello, this is probably something silly which I am doing, but I cannot understand why this allocation is not happening. Here is a my C code which tries to allocate a list of size 333559, and then a matrix of size 8*333559 I thought I might be running into memory problems, but R is not even using that much (I start R with more memory and it stays constant) Also, I start R as I normally do and I

...nd blur it with fragment-shaders... there are several ways this could be attacked, each having their advantages and disadvantages. A combination of multiple approaches might be viable too, if we want to allow optimized or/and fallback paths to actually do drop-shadows. But maybe we're also just overdoing things :) Next thing is now to stuff this in gnome-window-decorator.c, have those cairo-based drawing functions paint into GL-textures and use these instead of the hard-coded inline-pixmaps. Once I have this working I post a patch here for everybody to check out (and flame me ;). Best regards...

I am just working through my set of tests for R 1.1.0 and everything seems to be going fairly well other than a couple of bugs already reported and fixed. I previously specified Depends: R(>= 1.0.1). I have been making small changes to my own code and since I have been doing this with R 1.0.1 I am fairly sure everything still works with it, but I don't intend to test this as carefully as

For various reasons - I have been trying to get my Desktops and/or servers to shut-down a fixed time after a power fail - or better still a fixed time - or a low battery whichever comes first. I note in my upsc: *> upsc belkinusb* battery.charge: 100 battery.charge.low: 30 battery.charge.warning: 30 battery.runtime: 120 battery.type: PbAc battery.voltage: 27.3 battery.voltage.nominal: 24

Hello.... I'm testing the functionality of my NUT-setup (NUT 2.0.4-4 - Debian stable). The system is connected to the UPS, but is not powered by it. When running "upsmon -c fsd", upsmon says "Auto logout and shutdown proceeding". This is all well and good, but I never see the machine waiting for the UPS to cut the power. Instead it shuts down. It's my

I have a model “Conversation” and a model “Leader”. A Conversation is always led by exactly 1 Leader. I’ve overridden Conversation’s “validate” method to validate the presence of an associated Leader model. If I add a similar validation to the Leader model, however, Conversations can no longer be saved on creation because the Leader model is invalid. On creation of both a new Conversation and

...need to deal with the conflicts and generally poor quality packages, but the process to get there has been maddening at times. Does anyone have any thoughts on methodologies? Or as is more likely to be practical, rules of thumb such as the RPM query idea? What I''m not keen on is really overdoing the dependencies, so much as to create a manifest which is a script which runs in a straight up top-to-bottom fashion. It takes away the elegance of the language. (Unless I''m installing a well known clustering software which has such appalling dependency omissions in the RPMs you absol...

Hi guys, I have a data-set that fits well into a Weibull model y = a-b*exp(-c*x^d). I want to estimate the parameters of the coefficients a, b, c and d, given x and y. Can you guys help me? Just as an example, I fit the data y <- c(1,2,3,4,10,20) and x <- c(1,7,14,25,29,30) According to this model above, and using the software CurveExpert, and I got the estimates of a (2.95),b (2.90),c

On Wed, February 15, 2017 10:22 am, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Leonard den Ottolander <leonard at den.ottolander.nl> said: >> On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 09:47 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> > 2. They already have shell access on the machine in question and they >> > can already run anything in that shell that they can run via what you >> > are

...# Here I will shutdown the system # "/sbin/shutdown -h +0" break fi if [ $no_counter -ge $no_wait_time ] then echo "Have not seen OB for 1 min, so quiting the script" break fi sleep $poll_interval done But now I am starting to wonder if I am overdoing this. Surely there must already be a ready-made solution for this in NUT somewhere, but I have just searched with wrong words i Google. Have any of you done something similar with NUT, and what is the right way to do it? /raffe -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was...

Dear Colleagues I have been fitting some multinomial logistic regression models using R (version 1.6.1 on a linux box) and Stata 7. Although the vast majority of the parameter estimates and standard errors I get from R are the same as those from Stata (given rounding errors and so on), there are a few estimates for the same model which are quite different. I would be most grateful if

I just had a thought. It's probably going to be too big of a change for v2.0, so something to think about for v3.0: Supporting multiple UIDs is difficult. Currently expire-tool and v2.0's LMTP server are implemented in a way that it's always running as root and only temporarily dropping privileges. So any security hole in there gives the attacker root privileges. Not very

I don't have an opinion on the URL shorteners, but how about the original question? Redirection can be extremely useful in general. Shortening URLs is only one of its possible applications. FWIW, CRAN uses (303) redirect itself, e.g., https://cran.r-project.org/package=MASS is redirected to https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MASS/index.html Should these "canonical" CRAN links be

...; * in which I attempt to present a ***DepotAppProcess<http://wiki.awebfactory.com.ar/awebfactory/published/DepotAppProcess> * ( http://wiki.awebfactory.com.ar/awebfactory/published/DepotAppProcess ). Of course, the book must perforce stick very closely to Rails itself, but I just felt it was overdoing the "DRY" philosophy a tad. V. An unfinished section (not started yet, actually) on hooking up this process to the actual depot app implementation as shown in the book (will be *** FittingDepotStoryboardsWithRails<http://wiki.awebfactory.com.ar/awebfactory/published/FittingDepotStor...