search for: overcomplex

Thanks for the pointer. But I don't like this patch. If you find a bug, make a bug report or just fix it if you know the fix already. Or write something in IRC. Or write on the Mailing list as a general question or something else But I really don't agree on doing it this way. You would have needed like the same amount of time to actual fix the problem. Anyway, for adding a printk:

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/temp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/temp.c index b9703c0..adb1deb 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/temp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/temp.c @@ -120,6 +120,11 @@ nvkm_therm_sensor_event(struct nvkm_therm *therm, enum nvkm_therm_thrs thrs, struct work_struct *work; work =

...|Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |djm at mindrot.org --- Comment #1 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- This might be possible, though the known_hosts code is already rather overcomplex (despite recent simplification) In any case, there would still need to be at least one regular known_hosts file specified to add keys too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. You are watching the assignee of the bug.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1654 --- Comment #2 from Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett.org> --- (In reply to Damien Miller from comment #1) > This might be possible, though the known_hosts code is already > rather overcomplex (despite recent simplification) > > In any case, there would still need to be at least one regular > known_hosts file specified to add keys too. Right. For the initial pass, ssh would still always write new keys to .ssh/known_hosts, and only *read* from known_hosts.d; the user would man...

Hi. There are many ways of doing validation but I''m trying to think of the cleanest way without making the action code unclean. Would it be advisable to do validation on the incoming params hash rather than waiting to setup an object you are about to save and calling ojb.valid? before saving? Or even going as far as trying to save the object but failing from the model''s

If _you_ were asked to give a 40 minute dog and pony show about R for a group of scientists ranging from physicists to geographers what would you put in? These people want to know what R can do. I'm thinking about something like: A. Overview B. data structures C. arithmetic and manipulation D. reading data E. linear models using glm F. graphics G. programming H. other tricks like rpart or

[[Sending again, as for some strange reason it is not accepted]] Hello OpenSSH developers, I maintain external patch for PKCS#11 smartcard support into OpenSSH[1] , many users already apply and use this patch. I wish to know if anyone is interesting in working toward merging this into mainline. I had some discussion with Damien Miller, but then he disappeared. Having standard smartcard