Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "overambitious".
2008 Mar 25
1
[LLVMdev] Environment variables considered evil
...ork; at least I got some funny results (though that may have been
due to other reasons).
Well, you live and learn. I have now switched to opening a new shell
window whenever I start an experiment, since gcc won't become
environment-agnostic in my lifetime anyway.
Though that's bad. If some overambitious sysadmin adds a CFLAGS variable
to /etc/profile, people on that machine will get funny results. To make
matters worse, there does not seem to be an exhaustive list of
environment variables to check, at least not for gcc and autoconf
(though there are plenty of non-exhaustive ones). I know I have to...
2008 Mar 25
0
[LLVMdev] Potential breakage in llvm-gcc's ./configure
Hi Jo,
> No, that was written under the assumption that passing in CC and CXX
> via env variables wouldn't work. Things work now, so that assumption
> is obviously wrong.
>
> I still don't like environment variables. They tend to remain in
> effect long after I forgot that I set them, creating all sorts of
> hassle. In fact I suspect I already fell prey to this,
2008 Mar 24
2
[LLVMdev] Potential breakage in llvm-gcc's ./configure
Am Montag, den 24.03.2008, 12:06 -0700 schrieb Tanya M. Lattner:
> > This is close to a showstopper for integrating an llvm-gcc bootstrap
> > into the nightly tester. The llvm-gcc ./configure needs to be called
> > very differently from the llvm ./configure, and keeping two sets of
> > options is Not Worth The Trouble, at least IMHO.
>
> So you didn't like the