search for: overactions

here''s the output : # tc -s -d class show dev eth0 class cbq 1: root rate 10Mbit cell 8b (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit/8 weight 10Mbit allot 1514b level 2 ewma 5 avpkt 1000b maxidle 23us Sent 294 bytes 7 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 605 undertime 0 class cbq 1:10 parent 1:1 leaf 10: rate 100Kbit cell 8b prio 1/1 weight 100Kbit allot 1600b level 0 ewma 5 avpkt 1000b maxidle 23us Sent 12274 bytes 203 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 19) borrowed 0 overactions 7 avgidle 624 undertime 0 class cbq 1:1 parent 1: rate 100...

...tum 1514b perturb 10sec Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) qdisc sfq 100: quantum 1514b perturb 10sec Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) qdisc cbq 1: rate 100Mbit (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit Sent 711595 bytes 7024 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 60 undertime 0 ### eth0: traffic classes class cbq 1: root rate 100Mbit (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit Sent 711595 bytes 7024 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 60 undertime 0 class cbq 1:10 parent 1:1 leaf 100: rate 256Kbit prio no-transmit Sent...

...vpkt 1000 weight 11Kbit 6. tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 handle 1 fw classid 1:2 Now when I run=> tc -s class show dev eth1 parent 1:0 I get: class cbq 1: root rate 10Mbit (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit Sent 42 bytes 1 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 624 undertime 0 class cbq 1:1 parent 1: rate 10Mbit prio no-transmit Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 0 undertime 0 class cbq 1:2 parent 1:1 rate 100Kbit (bounded) prio no-transmit Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrow...

...: quantum 1514b perturb 10sec Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) qdisc sfq 10: quantum 1514b perturb 10sec Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) qdisc cbq 1: rate 10Mbit (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit Sent 1116535 bytes 6148 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 624 undertime 0 class cbq 1: root rate 10Mbit (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit Sent 1117031 bytes 6154 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 624 undertime 0 class cbq 1:10 parent 1:1 leaf 10: rate 120Kbit prio 1 Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits...

...it is about 500Kbps which is not what I want !. tc -s class show dev eth0 shows that I got the following [root@nat root]# /usr/local/sbin/traffic-limit.sh status class cbq 1: root rate 168Kbit (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit Sent 6068639 bytes 5841 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 38094 undertime 0 class cbq 1:1 parent 1: rate 8Kbit (bounded,isolated) prio 5 Sent 1460691 bytes 3174 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 12339) borrowed 0 overactions 1372 avgidle -115477 undertime -33146 class cbq 1:2 parent 1: rate 8Kbit (bounded,isolated) prio 5 Sent 2336291 bytes 3192 p...

...lt;<< @####.# @###.# @####### @####### @####### @####### @####### @####### > {$classid, @{$smoothed{$classid}}{''bytes'',''packets''}, > @{$classdata{$classid}}{''backlog'',''dropped'',''borrowed'',''overactions'',''tokens '',''ctokens''}} > . > > print $clear.$header; > > $watchclass =~ s/\?/\./g; > $watchclass =~ s/\*/\.\*/g; > > while (@allinfo = (readpipe("tc -s class show dev $iface"))) > { > # class cbq 1: root rate 100Mb...

Hi All, I''m using iptables-1.2.7a on RedHat8 kernel 2.4.20. I wanted to limit the file-sharing traffic to the internet. I marked the packets with iptables: iptables -A FORWARD -t mangle -p tcp -s 192.168.1.1/24 -d ! 192.168.1.1/24 --dport 1024:1862 -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -A FORWARD -t mangle -p tcp -s 192.168.1.1/24 -d ! 192.168.1.1/24 --dport 1864:65535 -j MARK --set-mark 1

...case borrows, when all sibling classes are isolated ? nessus:~# tc -s -d class show dev eth1 class cbq 1: root rate 100Mbit cell 8b (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit/8 weight 100Mbit allot 1514b level 2 ewma 5 avpkt 1000b maxidle 1us Sent 484 bytes 7 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 77 undertime 0 class cbq 1:1 parent 1: rate 768Kbit cell 8b (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit/8 allot 1500b level 1 ewma 5 avpkt 1000b maxidle 3772us Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 47589 overactions 0 avgidle 123622 undertime 0 class cbq 1:2 parent 1:1 leaf 2...

Hi folks. For quite a while, I tried to use linux (cbq and htb) to control bandwidth in order to replace a cisco equipment used to play this role on our network. After trying here and there, with a bunch of different distros, different versions, different compilations, ... the closest I could get was as follows: (using htb.init and cbq.init) Desired BW ==> Achieved BW 128k ==> 404.78

...d of comment why it is different? -Mehmet PS: tc -s class show dev eth0 shows that I got the following [root@nat root]# /usr/local/sbin/traffic-limit.sh status class cbq 1: root rate 168Kbit (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit Sent 6068639 bytes 5841 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 38094 undertime 0 class cbq 1:1 parent 1: rate 8Kbit (bounded,isolated) prio 5 Sent 1460691 bytes 3174 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 12339) borrowed 0 overactions 1372 avgidle -115477 undertime -33146 class cbq 1:2 parent 1: rate 8Kbit (bounded,isolated) prio 5 Sent 2336291 bytes 3192 p...

Maybe my imagination is overactive, but I seem to remember reading some- thing in the vein of a HOWTO/tutorial on adding a Win32 API call to Wine. It discussed the SPEC file, header files, etc. I've searched the winehq website and the source tree, but I can't seem to find this. Anyone know what I'm thinking of? Thanks! --

...s me the information. tc -s -d qdisc show dev vm01; tc -s -d class show dev vm01 qdisc cbq 11: rate 100Mbit cell 8b mpu 64b (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit/8 weight 100Mbit allot 1514b level 1 ewma 5 avpkt 1000b maxidle 2us Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 65 undertime 0 class cbq 11: root rate 100Mbit cell 8b mpu 64b (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit/8 weight 100Mbit allot 1514b level 1 ewma 5 avpkt 1000b maxidle 2us Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 65 undertime 0 class cbq 11:1...

Sub:[LARTC] cbq init for one port on a subnet Hello, We use cbq.init to limit bandwidth. It works great on a per-user basis. Now I''d like to limit traffic from a netblock to the Internet on port 6699. Network is 192.168.0.160 mask 255.255.255.224 eth0 is the gateway eth1 connects the netblock in question Is this the proper syntax; DEVICE=eth0,10Mbit,1Mbit RATE=100Kbit

Hello, I''m using tc to limit the bandwidth of our wireless customers. I have a working script, but I''m not happy with it. I''m trying to write a more sophisticated script, but when I run it, it give me this error: RTNETLINK answers: File exists I have no idea what this error means or how to fix it. Here is a portion of the script (the whole script shapes several

...0) ### eth1: queueing disciplines qdisc pfifo_fast 0: [Unknown qdisc, optlen=20] Sent 44005 bytes 335 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) ### eth2: queueing disciplines qdisc cbq 1: rate 100Mbit (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit Sent 2869896 bytes 3850 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 62 undertime 0 ### eth2: traffic classes class cbq 1:1001 parent 1: rate 80Kbit (bounded) prio 5 Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 2.26888e+06 undertime 0 class cbq 1: root rate 100Mbit (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit Sent 2872596 byt...

Hi folks, I read the fantastic LARTC How-to and after that i tried to limit one host in my LAN for both down-and upload bandwidth usage. I took section 15.9. and added uplink-limiting as I understood it from the previous chapters. Unfortunately it doesn''t work. I ran the script and went to the specified PC, started a download, and watched the rate. The rate was always about 2000 kbit/s,

...128p flows 128/1024 Sent 7481929 bytes 51839 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) qdisc cbq 10: dev eth0 rate 64Kbit cell 8b (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit/8 weight 64Kbit allot 1514b level 2 ewma 5 avpkt 1000b maxidle 3813us Sent 59200280 bytes 119949 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 99999 undertime 0 What''s wrong? Why there is no dropped neither overlimits? I do everything like in AdvRouting HOWTO. Linux RedHat 7.0 2.2.17-14 -- Best regards, Serguei mailto:manowar@gsc-game.kiev.ua

Hi i have configured my server with cbq and gred. The problem is that the cbq doesnt drop packets. The cbq is configured at a rate of 500Kbit "qdisc cbq 4: rate 500000bit (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit Sent 100103048 bytes 73933 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 24000 undertime 0 " The traffic that being generated is more than 5Mbit with the appropriate tos. The traffic is identified correctly and pass succesfully from the cbq but no one packet gets dropped.. What do u suggest me to do? Below is the code for the configuration.. it works fi...

...h0 bands 4 priomap 0 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Sent 69665656 bytes 129757 pkts (dropped 3556, overlimits 0) backlog 10p qdisc cbq 128: dev eth0 rate 10Mbit (bounded, isolated) prio no-transmit sent 69674548 bytes 129957 pkts (dropped 3356, overlimits 147192) backlog 10p borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 399 undertime 0 tc -stat filter show dev eth0 filter parent 128: protocol ip pref 5 u32 filter parent 128: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1 filter parent 128: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 128:1 match a.b.c.d/ffffffff at 12 I really wa...

...(dropped 0, overlimits 0) qdisc sfq 10: dev ppp0 quantum 1500b perturb 10sec Sent 317956 bytes 6133 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) qdisc cbq 1: dev ppp0 rate 10Mbit (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit Sent 6455294 bytes 11521 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 26113) backlog 34p borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 624 undertime 0 Packets are sent to the correct flow but ICMP response is far worse! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I know the filters are matching correctly as the right number of packets go to the correct flow. But could you please...